Ramli Anis Safura, Selvarajah Sharmini, Daud Maryam Hannah, Haniff Jamaiyah, Abdul-Razak Suraya, Tg-Abu-Bakar-Sidik Tg Mohd Ikhwan, Bujang Mohamad Adam, Chew Boon How, Rahman Thuhairah, Tong Seng Fah, Shafie Asrul Akmal, Lee Verna K M, Ng Kien Keat, Ariffin Farnaza, Abdul-Hamid Hasidah, Mazapuspavina Md Yasin, Mat-Nasir Nafiza, Chan Chun W, Yong-Rafidah Abdul Rahman, Ismail Mastura, Lakshmanan Sharmila, Low Wilson H H
Discipline of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Selayang Campus, Jalan Prima Selayang 7, 68100, Batu Caves, Selangor, Malaysia.
Institute for Pathology, Laboratory and Forensic Medicine (I-PPerForM), Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Sungai Buloh Campus, Jalan Hospital, 47000, Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia.
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Nov 14;17(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0557-1.
The chronic care model was proven effective in improving clinical outcomes of diabetes in developed countries. However, evidence in developing countries is scarce. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of EMPOWER-PAR intervention (based on the chronic care model) in improving clinical outcomes for type 2 diabetes mellitus using readily available resources in the Malaysian public primary care setting.
This was a pragmatic, cluster-randomised, parallel, matched pair, controlled trial using participatory action research approach, conducted in 10 public primary care clinics in Malaysia. Five clinics were randomly selected to provide the EMPOWER-PAR intervention for 1 year and another five clinics continued with usual care. Patients who fulfilled the criteria were recruited over a 2-week period by each clinic. The obligatory intervention components were designed based on four elements of the chronic care model i.e. healthcare organisation, delivery system design, self-management support and decision support. The primary outcome was the change in the proportion of patients achieving HbA1c < 6.5%. Secondary outcomes were the change in proportion of patients achieving targets for blood pressure, lipid profile, body mass index and waist circumference. Intention to treat analysis was performed for all outcome measures. A generalised estimating equation method was used to account for baseline differences and clustering effect.
A total of 888 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients were recruited at baseline (intervention: 471 vs.
417). At 1-year, 96.6 and 97.8% of patients in the intervention and control groups completed the study, respectively. The baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of both groups were comparable. The change in the proportion of patients achieving HbA1c target was significantly higher in the intervention compared to the control group (intervention: 3.0% vs.
-4.1%, P < 0.002). Patients who received the EMPOWER-PAR intervention were twice more likely to achieve HbA1c target compared to those in the control group (adjusted OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.34-3.50, P < 0.002). However, there was no significant improvement found in the secondary outcomes.
This study demonstrates that the EMPOWER-PAR intervention was effective in improving the primary outcome for type 2 diabetes in the Malaysian public primary care setting.
Registered with: ClinicalTrials.gov.: NCT01545401 . Date of registration: 1st March 2012.
慢性照护模式已被证明在发达国家可有效改善糖尿病的临床结局。然而,发展中国家的相关证据较少。本研究的目的是评估基于慢性照护模式的EMPOWER-PAR干预措施,利用马来西亚公立基层医疗环境中现有的资源,对2型糖尿病临床结局的改善效果。
这是一项实用的、整群随机、平行、配对对照试验,采用参与性行动研究方法,在马来西亚的10家公立基层医疗诊所开展。随机选择5家诊所提供为期1年的EMPOWER-PAR干预,另外5家诊所继续常规护理。符合标准的患者由各诊所于2周内招募。强制性干预措施基于慢性照护模式的四个要素设计,即医疗组织、服务提供系统设计、自我管理支持和决策支持。主要结局是糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)<6.5%的患者比例的变化。次要结局是血压、血脂谱、体重指数和腰围达标的患者比例的变化。对所有结局指标进行意向性分析。采用广义估计方程法来考虑基线差异和聚类效应。
基线时共招募了888例2型糖尿病患者(干预组:471例 vs. 对照组:417例)。1年后,干预组和对照组分别有96.6%和97.8%的患者完成了研究。两组的基线人口统计学和临床特征具有可比性。与对照组相比,干预组中达到HbA1c目标的患者比例变化显著更高(干预组:3.0% vs. 对照组:-4.1%,P<0.002)。接受EMPOWER-PAR干预的患者实现HbA1c目标的可能性是对照组患者的两倍(校正比值比2.16,95%置信区间1.34 - 3.50,P<0.002)。然而,次要结局未发现显著改善。
本研究表明,EMPOWER-PAR干预措施在马来西亚公立基层医疗环境中可有效改善2型糖尿病的主要结局。
已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号:NCT01545401。注册日期:2012年3月1日。