• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高中生命科学教师的学科知识和学生错误观念知识对学生学习的影响。

The Impact of High School Life Science Teachers' Subject Matter Knowledge and Knowledge of Student Misconceptions on Students' Learning.

机构信息

Science Education Department, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138.

出版信息

CBE Life Sci Educ. 2020 Mar;19(1):ar9. doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-08-0164.

DOI:10.1187/cbe.19-08-0164
PMID:32108561
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8697650/
Abstract

One of the foundational assumptions in education is that greater teacher knowledge contributes to greater gains in student knowledge, but empirical evidence in support of this assumption is scarce. Using a U.S. sample of 79 biology teachers and their 2749 high school students, we investigate whether teachers' subject matter knowledge (SMK) and knowledge of students' misconceptions (KOSM) in high school life science are associated with students' posttest performance on multiple-choice test items designed to reveal student misconceptions, after controlling for their pretest scores. We found that students were more likely to answer an item on the posttest correctly if their teachers could answer the question correctly, themselves (SMK). Teachers' ability to predict students' most common wrong answer (KOSM) for an item predicted even better student performance. Items for which a particular wrong answer rose above others in popularity saw an even greater benefit for teacher KOSM.

摘要

教育的一个基本假设是,教师的知识越多,学生的知识增长就越大,但支持这一假设的经验证据却很少。本研究使用了美国的一个生物学教师样本(79 人)及其 2749 名高中生,调查了高中生命科学中教师的学科知识(SMK)和学生错误观念知识(KOSM)是否与学生在多项选择题上的后测表现相关,这些多选题旨在揭示学生的错误观念,且控制了他们的前测分数。我们发现,如果学生的老师能够正确回答问题(SMK),那么学生在后测中更有可能答对一个项目。教师预测一个项目中最常见的错误答案(KOSM)的能力甚至能更好地预测学生的表现。对于某个特定的错误答案比其他答案更受欢迎的项目,教师的 KOSM 能带来更大的收益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5d1/8697650/9da9c2db3df7/cbe-19-ar9-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5d1/8697650/5374fa36c31a/cbe-19-ar9-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5d1/8697650/8df61f75260f/cbe-19-ar9-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5d1/8697650/9da9c2db3df7/cbe-19-ar9-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5d1/8697650/5374fa36c31a/cbe-19-ar9-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5d1/8697650/8df61f75260f/cbe-19-ar9-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5d1/8697650/9da9c2db3df7/cbe-19-ar9-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Impact of High School Life Science Teachers' Subject Matter Knowledge and Knowledge of Student Misconceptions on Students' Learning.高中生命科学教师的学科知识和学生错误观念知识对学生学习的影响。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2020 Mar;19(1):ar9. doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-08-0164.
2
Assessing the life science knowledge of students and teachers represented by the K-8 national science standards.评估以 K-8 国家科学标准为代表的学生和教师的生命科学知识。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2013 Fall;12(3):553-75. doi: 10.1187/cbe.12-06-0078.
3
Class- and subject teachers' self-efficacy and emotional stability and students' perceptions of the teacher-student relationship, classroom management, and classroom disruptions.班主任和学科教师的自我效能感和情绪稳定性,以及学生对师生关系、课堂管理和课堂干扰的看法。
BMC Psychol. 2021 Jul 8;9(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00606-6.
4
The relationship between teacher burnout and student motivation.教师职业倦怠与学生学习动机之间的关系。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2015 Dec;85(4):519-32. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12089. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
5
Similarities and dissimilarities between teachers' and students' relationship views in upper elementary school: The role of personal teacher and student attributes.小学高年段师生关系观点的异同:个人教师和学生属性的作用。
J Sch Psychol. 2017 Oct;64:43-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 May 10.
6
Teachers' physiological and self-reported stress, teaching practices and students' learning outcomes in Grade 1.一年级教师的生理和自我报告压力、教学实践与学生学习成果。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2023 Apr;93 Suppl 1:211-226. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12529. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
7
Associations among teachers' depressive symptoms and students' classroom instructional experiences in third grade.教师抑郁症状与三年级学生课堂教学体验的关联。
J Sch Psychol. 2018 Aug;69:154-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
8
Identifying and dealing with student errors in the mathematics classroom: Cognitive and motivational requirements.识别与处理数学课堂上学生的错误:认知与动机要求
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 15;13:1057730. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1057730. eCollection 2022.
9
The Effects of Computerized Versus Collaborative Professional Development on Teachers' and Students' Performance Related to the Concept Anchoring Routine.计算机化与协作式专业发展对教师和学生在概念锚定常规方面表现的影响。
J Learn Disabil. 2021 Nov;54(6):420-437. doi: 10.1177/0022219420988001. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
10
A well-slept teacher is a better teacher: A multi-respondent experience-sampling study on sleep, stress, and emotional transmission in the classroom.睡眠良好的教师是更优秀的教师:一项关于课堂上睡眠、压力和情绪传递的多应答者经验抽样研究。
Psych J. 2019 Sep;8(3):280-292. doi: 10.1002/pchj.282. Epub 2019 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing Academic Performance of Elementary Education Majors in General Education Science Courses.比较基础教育专业学生在普通教育科学课程中的学业表现。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 19;20(3):e0320137. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320137. eCollection 2025.
2
Annotations of Research: Enhancing Accessibility and Promoting High Quality Biology Education Research.研究注释:提高可及性并促进高质量生物学教育研究。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Mar;23(1):fe2. doi: 10.1187/cbe.23-09-0171.
3
What College Biology Students Know about How Vaccines Work.大学生对疫苗作用原理的了解程度。

本文引用的文献

1
Brain activations associated with scientific reasoning: a literature review.与科学推理相关的大脑激活:文献综述。
Cogn Process. 2019 May;20(2):139-161. doi: 10.1007/s10339-018-0896-z. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
2
Inhibitory control and counterintuitive science and maths reasoning in adolescence.青少年的抑制控制与反直觉科学和数学推理。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 21;13(6):e0198973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198973. eCollection 2018.
3
Teacher Knowledge for Active-Learning Instruction: Expert-Novice Comparison Reveals Differences.主动学习教学的教师知识:专家-新手比较揭示差异。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2022 Dec;21(4):ar75. doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-12-0294.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Spring;17(1). doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-07-0149.
4
Tensions Between Science and Intuition Across the Lifespan.一生中科学与直觉之间的紧张关系。
Top Cogn Sci. 2016 Jan;8(1):118-37. doi: 10.1111/tops.12174. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
5
Assessing the life science knowledge of students and teachers represented by the K-8 national science standards.评估以 K-8 国家科学标准为代表的学生和教师的生命科学知识。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2013 Fall;12(3):553-75. doi: 10.1187/cbe.12-06-0078.
6
Professional development for science teachers.科学教师的专业发展。
Science. 2013 Apr 19;340(6130):310-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1230725.
7
Professional physical scientists display tenacious teleological tendencies: purpose-based reasoning as a cognitive default.专业物理科学家表现出顽强的目的论倾向:基于目的的推理是一种认知偏好。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Nov;142(4):1074-83. doi: 10.1037/a0030399. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
8
A diagnostic assessment for introductory molecular and cell biology.入门分子与细胞生物学的诊断评估。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2010 Winter;9(4):453-61. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-04-0055.
9
Developmental "roots" in mature biological knowledge.成熟生物学知识中的发展“根源”。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Apr;20(4):480-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02320.x.
10
Development and evaluation of a genetics literacy assessment instrument for undergraduates.大学生遗传学素养评估工具的开发与评价
Genetics. 2008 Jan;178(1):15-22. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.079533.