Kopchok G E, White R A, White G H, Fujitani R, Vlasak J, Dykhovsky L, Grundfest W S
Division of Vascular Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance.
Lasers Surg Med. 1988;8(6):584-8. doi: 10.1002/lsm.1900080608.
CO2 and argon lasers have been used successfully for vascular welding in both experimental and clinical settings. This study compared the thermodynamics during CO2 and argon laser welding of 1-cm longitudinal arteriotomies in a canine model. Continuous recordings using an AGA 782 digital thermographic system with spatial and thermal resolution of +/-0.2 mm and +/-0.2 degree C, respectively, were analyzed. A HGM argon laser using a 300-microns optic fiber held at 1 cm from the vessel edges (spot diameter = 2.8 mm) with concomitant room temperature saline irrigation (1 drop/sec) was used for argon welds. Total exposure time was 150 sec/cm. CO2 welds were performed with a Sharplan CO2 laser (spot diameter = 0.22 mm) with no irrigation for total exposure time of 10 sec/cm. Thermodynamic results and laser parameters are summarized as follows: Argon-n = 20; power = 500 mW; energy fluence = 1,400 J/cm2; Tmax = 48.8 degrees C; T mean +/- S.D. = 45.1 +/- 2.7 degrees C; CO2-n = 20; power = 150 mW; energy fluence = 3,000 J/cm2; Tmax 84.0 degrees C; T mean +/- S.D. = 60.7 +/- 9.8 degrees C. There was a significant difference (P less than .05) in thermal measurements between successful CO2 and argon vascular welds. Temperature rise during the argon welds was limited by saline irrigation. In contrast, during CO2 laser welding, the temperature rose quickly to its maximum and was maintained at a relatively high level as the laser progressed (0.1 cm/sec) along the anastomosis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
二氧化碳激光和氩激光已成功应用于实验和临床环境中的血管焊接。本研究比较了在犬模型中对1厘米长的纵向动脉切开术进行二氧化碳激光和氩激光焊接时的热力学情况。使用AGA 782数字热成像系统进行连续记录,其空间分辨率和热分辨率分别为±0.2毫米和±0.2摄氏度,并对记录进行了分析。氩焊使用一台HGM氩激光,通过一根300微米的光纤,光纤距血管边缘1厘米(光斑直径 = 2.8毫米),同时进行室温盐水冲洗(每秒1滴)。总曝光时间为150秒/厘米。二氧化碳焊接使用Sharplan二氧化碳激光(光斑直径 = 0.22毫米),不进行冲洗,总曝光时间为10秒/厘米。热力学结果和激光参数总结如下:氩激光 - n = 20;功率 = 500毫瓦;能量通量 = 1400焦/平方厘米;最高温度 = 48.8摄氏度;平均温度±标准差 = 45.1±2.7摄氏度;二氧化碳激光 - n = 20;功率 = 150毫瓦;能量通量 = 3000焦/平方厘米;最高温度84.0摄氏度;平均温度±标准差 = 60.7±9.8摄氏度。成功的二氧化碳激光和氩激光血管焊接之间的热测量存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。氩焊过程中的温度上升受到盐水冲洗的限制。相比之下,在二氧化碳激光焊接过程中,温度迅速上升至最高值,并随着激光沿吻合口前进(0.1厘米/秒)而保持在相对较高的水平。(摘要截短于250字)