• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善癌症患者的保险选择(I Can PIC):个性化健康保险决策辅助工具的随机试验。

Improving Cancer Patients' Insurance Choices (I Can PIC): A Randomized Trial of a Personalized Health Insurance Decision Aid.

机构信息

Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Brown School and Center for Health Economics and Policy, Institute for Public Health, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

Oncologist. 2020 Jul;25(7):609-619. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0703. Epub 2020 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0703
PMID:32108976
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7356712/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many cancer survivors struggle to choose a health insurance plan that meets their needs because of high costs, limited health insurance literacy, and lack of decision support. We developed a web-based decision aid, Improving Cancer Patients' Insurance Choices (I Can PIC), and evaluated it in a randomized trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligible individuals (18-64 years, diagnosed with cancer for ≤5 years, English-speaking, not Medicaid or Medicare eligible) were randomized to I Can PIC or an attention control health insurance worksheet. Primary outcomes included health insurance knowledge, decisional conflict, and decision self-efficacy after completing I Can PIC or the control. Secondary outcomes included knowledge, decisional conflict, decision self-efficacy, health insurance literacy, financial toxicity, and delayed care at a 3-6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 263 of 335 eligible participants (79%) consented and were randomized; 206 (73%) completed the initial survey (106 in I Can PIC; 100 in the control), and 180 (87%) completed a 3-6 month follow-up. After viewing I Can PIC or the control, health insurance knowledge and a health insurance literacy item assessing confidence understanding health insurance were higher in the I Can PIC group. At follow-up, the I Can PIC group retained higher knowledge than the control; confidence understanding health insurance was not reassessed. There were no significant differences between groups in other outcomes. Results did not change when controlling for health literacy and employment. Both groups reported having limited health insurance options.

CONCLUSION

I Can PIC can improve cancer survivors' health insurance knowledge and confidence using health insurance. System-level interventions are needed to lower financial toxicity and help patients manage care costs.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Inadequate health insurance compromises cancer treatment and impacts overall and cancer-specific mortality. Uninsured or underinsured survivors report fewer recommended cancer screenings and may delay or avoid needed follow-up cancer care because of costs. Even those with adequate insurance report difficulty managing care costs. Health insurance decision support and resources to help manage care costs are thus paramount to cancer survivors' health and care management. We developed a web-based decision aid, Improving Cancer Patients' Insurance Choices (I Can PIC), and evaluated it in a randomized trial. I Can PIC provides health insurance information, supports patients through managing care costs, offers a list of financial and emotional support resources, and provides a personalized cost estimate of annual health care expenses across plan types.

摘要

背景

许多癌症幸存者在选择满足其需求的健康保险计划时遇到困难,这是由于费用高、健康保险知识有限以及缺乏决策支持。我们开发了一种基于网络的决策辅助工具,名为“改善癌症患者保险选择(I Can PIC)”,并在一项随机试验中对其进行了评估。

材料与方法

符合条件的个体(18-64 岁,癌症诊断时间不超过 5 年,会说英语,不符合医疗补助或医疗保险资格)被随机分配到 I Can PIC 或注意力控制健康保险工作表组。主要结果包括完成 I Can PIC 或对照组后健康保险知识、决策冲突和决策自我效能的变化。次要结果包括知识、决策冲突、决策自我效能、健康保险素养、财务毒性和 3-6 个月随访时的延迟护理。

结果

共有 335 名符合条件的参与者中的 263 名(79%)同意并被随机分配;206 名(73%)完成了初始调查(I Can PIC 组 106 名,对照组 100 名),180 名(87%)完成了 3-6 个月的随访。与观看 I Can PIC 或对照组相比,I Can PIC 组的健康保险知识和一项评估理解健康保险信心的健康保险素养项目更高。在随访时,I Can PIC 组的知识保留率高于对照组;没有重新评估对健康保险的理解信心。两组在其他结果上没有显著差异。在控制健康素养和就业的情况下,结果没有变化。两组都报告说健康保险选择有限。

结论

I Can PIC 可以提高癌症幸存者使用健康保险的健康保险知识和信心。需要进行系统层面的干预,以降低财务毒性并帮助患者管理护理费用。

意义

不充分的健康保险会影响癌症治疗,并影响整体和癌症特异性死亡率。未参保或参保不足的幸存者报告的推荐癌症筛查较少,可能会因费用而延迟或避免所需的后续癌症护理。即使那些有足够保险的人也报告说难以管理护理费用。因此,健康保险决策支持和帮助管理护理费用的资源对癌症幸存者的健康和护理管理至关重要。我们开发了一种基于网络的决策辅助工具,名为“改善癌症患者保险选择(I Can PIC)”,并在一项随机试验中对其进行了评估。I Can PIC 提供健康保险信息,通过管理护理费用来支持患者,提供一系列财务和情感支持资源,并提供按计划类型计算的年度医疗费用的个性化估计。

相似文献

1
Improving Cancer Patients' Insurance Choices (I Can PIC): A Randomized Trial of a Personalized Health Insurance Decision Aid.改善癌症患者的保险选择(I Can PIC):个性化健康保险决策辅助工具的随机试验。
Oncologist. 2020 Jul;25(7):609-619. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0703. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
2
"It's just not easy to understand": A mixed methods study of health insurance literacy and insurance plan decision-making in cancer survivors.“这真的很难理解”:一项关于癌症幸存者健康保险知识和保险计划决策的混合方法研究。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jul;12(14):15424-15434. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6133. Epub 2023 May 23.
3
A Randomized Trial Examining Three Strategies for Supporting Health Insurance Decisions among the Uninsured.一项针对三种帮助未参保者做出医疗保险决策策略的随机试验。
Med Decis Making. 2016 Oct;36(7):911-22. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15578635. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
4
Comparative Effectiveness of a Web-Based Patient Decision Aid for Therapeutic Options for Sickle Cell Disease: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于网络的镰状细胞病治疗方案患者决策辅助工具的比较效果:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Dec 4;21(12):e14462. doi: 10.2196/14462.
5
Show Me My Health Plans: a study protocol of a randomized trial testing a decision support tool for the federal health insurance marketplace in Missouri.向我展示我的健康计划:一项随机试验的研究方案,该试验测试了密苏里州联邦医疗保险市场的决策支持工具。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Feb 16;16:55. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1314-9.
6
Association Between Health Insurance Literacy and Avoidance of Health Care Services Owing to Cost.健康保险素养与因费用而避免医疗服务之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Nov 2;1(7):e184796. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4796.
7
Use of Low-Literacy Decision Aid to Enhance Knowledge and Reduce Decisional Conflict Among a Diverse Population of Adults With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results of a Pilot Study.使用低识字率决策辅助工具提高类风湿性关节炎成年患者群体的知识水平并减少决策冲突:一项试点研究的结果
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Jul;68(7):889-98. doi: 10.1002/acr.22801.
8
A case study of adapting a health insurance decision intervention from trial into routine cancer care.一项将健康保险决策干预措施从试验转化为常规癌症护理的案例研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2022 Sep 10;15(1):298. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06189-8.
9
Evaluating Adaptation of a Cancer Clinical Trial Decision Aid for Rural Cancer Patients: A Mixed-Methods Approach.评估针对农村癌症患者的癌症临床试验决策辅助工具的适应性:一种混合方法研究。
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Aug;34(4):803-809. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1377-x.
10
Preference Elicitation and Treatment Decision-Making Among Men Diagnosed With Prostate Cancer: Randomized Controlled Trial Results of Healium.前列腺癌男性患者的偏好评估与治疗决策:Healium 的随机对照试验结果
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 20;25:e46552. doi: 10.2196/46552.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing complexity: The development and pilot testing of a user-friendly Medicare Part D patient decision aid tool.应对复杂性:一款用户友好型医疗保险D部分患者决策辅助工具的开发与试点测试
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025 Sep;31(9):868-878. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.9.868.
2
"Nothing Is as Great a Learning Experience as Getting a $15,000 Bill": A Mixed-Methods Study of Young Adult Cancer Survivors' Experience With Insurance Coverage.“没有什么比收到一张1.5万美元的账单更能成为一次深刻的学习经历了”:一项关于年轻成年癌症幸存者保险覆盖经历的混合方法研究。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2025 Jun 16:OP2401075. doi: 10.1200/OP-24-01075.
3
A Scoping Review of Interventions to Address Financial Toxicity in Pediatric and Adult Patients and Survivors of Cancer.针对儿科和成年癌症患者及幸存者的财务毒性干预措施的范围综述。
Cancer Med. 2025 Apr;14(8):e70879. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70879.
4
The development and preliminary evaluation of a financial navigation program among patients with breast cancer in China.中国乳腺癌患者财务导航项目的开发与初步评估
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2025 Feb 17;12:100668. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100668. eCollection 2025 Dec.
5
Insights on Improving Health Insurance Literacy in Diabetes.提高糖尿病患者健康保险素养的见解。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2025 Feb 25;110(Supplement_2):S175-S186. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgae706.
6
A Costly Cure: Understanding and Addressing Financial Toxicity in Cardiovascular Disease Health Care Within the Domain of Social Determinants of Health.代价高昂的治疗:在健康的社会决定因素领域中理解和应对心血管疾病医疗保健中的经济毒性。
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2024 Nov 5;20(5):15-26. doi: 10.14797/mdcvj.1466. eCollection 2024.
7
Interventions to mitigate cancer-related medical financial hardship: A systematic review and meta-analysis.减轻癌症相关医疗财务困难的干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer. 2024 Sep 15;130(18):3198-3209. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35367. Epub 2024 May 17.
8
Interventions to Mitigate Financial Toxicity in Adult Patients with Cancer in the United States: A Scoping Review.美国减轻成年癌症患者财务毒性的干预措施:一项范围综述。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Feb 6;31(2):918-932. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31020068.
9
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.决策辅助工具用于帮助面临医疗保健治疗或筛查决策的人。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 29;1(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub6.
10
Determination of a cut-off COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) for identifying cost-related treatment nonadherence and impaired health-related quality of life among Chinese patients with cancer.确定用于识别中国癌症患者中与费用相关的治疗不依从性和健康相关生活质量受损的财务毒性综合评分(COST)临界值。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Jan 27;32(2):136. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08320-w.

本文引用的文献

1
High-Deductible Health Plans and Cancer Survivorship: What Is the Association With Access to Care and Hospital Emergency Department Use?高免赔额健康计划与癌症生存者:与获得医疗服务和使用医院急诊部之间有何关联?
J Oncol Pract. 2019 Nov;15(11):e957-e968. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00699. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
2
Patient recommendations for reducing long-lasting economic burden after breast cancer.患者对降低乳腺癌长期经济负担的建议。
Cancer. 2019 Jun 1;125(11):1929-1940. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32012. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
3
Burden Associated With Selecting and Using Health Insurance to Manage Care Costs: Results of a Qualitative Study of Nonelderly Cancer Survivors.与选择和使用医疗保险来管理医疗费用相关的负担:对非老年癌症幸存者的定性研究结果。
Med Care Res Rev. 2021 Feb;78(1):48-56. doi: 10.1177/1077558718820232. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
4
Access Is Necessary but Not Sufficient: Factors Influencing Delay and Avoidance of Health Care Services.获得医疗服务是必要的,但并非充分条件:影响医疗服务延迟和回避的因素
MDM Policy Pract. 2018 Mar 26;3(1):2381468318760298. doi: 10.1177/2381468318760298. eCollection 2018 Jan-Jun.
5
Simplifying The Medicare Plan Finder Tool Could Help Older Adults Choose Lower-Cost Part D Plans.简化医疗保险计划选择工具可以帮助老年人选择更低成本的 Part D 计划。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Aug;37(8):1290-1297. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0145.
6
Dissemination of a Web-Based Tool for Supporting Health Insurance Plan Decisions (Show Me Health Plans): Cross-Sectional Observational Study.用于支持健康保险计划决策的基于网络的工具(向我展示健康计划)的传播:横断面观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 20;20(6):e209. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9829.
7
Show Me My Health Plans: Using a Decision Aid to Improve Decisions in the Federal Health Insurance Marketplace.向我展示我的健康保险计划:使用决策辅助工具改善联邦医疗保险市场中的决策。
MDM Policy Pract. 2016 Jul;1(1). doi: 10.1177/2381468316679998. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
8
Out-of-Pocket Costs, Financial Distress, and Underinsurance in Cancer Care.癌症治疗中的自付费用、经济困境和保险不足。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Nov 1;3(11):1582-1584. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.2148.
9
The Relationship of Health Insurance and Mortality: Is Lack of Insurance Deadly?医疗保险与死亡率的关系:没有保险是否致命?
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Sep 19;167(6):424-431. doi: 10.7326/M17-1403. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
10
Access to Accredited Cancer Hospitals Within Federal Exchange Plans Under the Affordable Care Act.根据《平价医疗法案》,联邦医保交易所计划下的参保人能否使用经认可的癌症医院服务。
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb 20;35(6):645-651. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.9835. Epub 2017 Jan 9.