• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

向我展示我的健康保险计划:使用决策辅助工具改善联邦医疗保险市场中的决策。

Show Me My Health Plans: Using a Decision Aid to Improve Decisions in the Federal Health Insurance Marketplace.

作者信息

Politi Mary C, Kuzemchak Marie D, Liu Jingxia, Barker Abigail R, Peters Ellen, Ubel Peter A, Kaphingst Kimberly A, McBride Timothy, Kreuter Matthew W, Shacham Enbal, Philpott Sydney E

机构信息

Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri (MCP, MDK, JL, SEP); Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri (ARB, TM, MWK); Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (EP); Fuqua School of Business, Sanford School of Public Policy, and School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (PAU); Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (KAK); and College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri (ES).

出版信息

MDM Policy Pract. 2016 Jul;1(1). doi: 10.1177/2381468316679998. Epub 2016 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1177/2381468316679998
PMID:28804780
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5550739/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Since the Affordable Care Act was passed, more than 12 million individuals have enrolled in the health insurance marketplace. Without support, many struggle to make an informed plan choice that meets their health and financial needs.

METHODS

We designed and evaluated a decision aid, Show Me My Health Plans (SMHP), that provides education, preference assessment, and an annual out-of-pocket cost calculator with plan recommendations produced by a tailored, risk-adjusted algorithm incorporating age, gender, and health status. We evaluated whether SMHP compared to HealthCare.gov improved health insurance decision quality and the match between plan choice, needs, and preferences among 328 Missourians enrolling in the marketplace.

RESULTS

Participants who used SMHP had higher health insurance knowledge (LS-Mean = 78 vs. 62; P < 0.001), decision self-efficacy (LS-Mean = 83 vs. 75; P < 0.002), confidence in their choice (LS-Mean = 3.5 vs. 2.9; P < 0.001), and improved health insurance literacy (odds ratio = 2.52, P <0.001) compared to participants using HealthCare.gov. Those using SMHP were 10.3 times more likely to select a silver- or gold-tier plan (P < 0.0001).

DISCUSSION

SMHP can improve health insurance decision quality and the odds that consumers select an insurance plan with coverage likely needed to meet their health needs. This study represents a unique context through which to apply principles of decision support to improve health insurance choices.

摘要

引言

自《平价医疗法案》通过以来,超过1200万人已在医疗保险市场注册。如果没有支持,许多人难以做出符合其健康和财务需求的明智计划选择。

方法

我们设计并评估了一种决策辅助工具“向我展示我的健康计划”(SMHP),它提供教育、偏好评估以及年度自付费用计算器,并通过结合年龄、性别和健康状况的定制风险调整算法生成计划建议。我们评估了与HealthCare.gov相比,SMHP是否提高了医疗保险决策质量以及328名在市场注册的密苏里州人在计划选择、需求和偏好之间的匹配度。

结果

与使用HealthCare.gov的参与者相比,使用SMHP的参与者具有更高的医疗保险知识(最小二乘均值 = 78对62;P < 0.001)、决策自我效能感(最小二乘均值 = 83对75;P < 0.002)、对其选择的信心(最小二乘均值 = 3.5对2.9;P < 0.001),并且医疗保险素养有所提高(优势比 = 2.52,P < 0.001)。使用SMHP的人选择白银或黄金层级计划的可能性高出10.3倍(P < 0.0001)。

讨论

SMHP可以提高医疗保险决策质量以及消费者选择可能需要的保险计划以满足其健康需求的几率。这项研究代表了一个独特的背景,可通过该背景应用决策支持原则来改善医疗保险选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d259/6124931/ca53efa3b9c2/10.1177_2381468316679998-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d259/6124931/ca53efa3b9c2/10.1177_2381468316679998-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d259/6124931/ca53efa3b9c2/10.1177_2381468316679998-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Show Me My Health Plans: Using a Decision Aid to Improve Decisions in the Federal Health Insurance Marketplace.向我展示我的健康保险计划:使用决策辅助工具改善联邦医疗保险市场中的决策。
MDM Policy Pract. 2016 Jul;1(1). doi: 10.1177/2381468316679998. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
2
Dissemination of a Web-Based Tool for Supporting Health Insurance Plan Decisions (Show Me Health Plans): Cross-Sectional Observational Study.用于支持健康保险计划决策的基于网络的工具(向我展示健康计划)的传播:横断面观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 20;20(6):e209. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9829.
3
Show Me My Health Plans: a study protocol of a randomized trial testing a decision support tool for the federal health insurance marketplace in Missouri.向我展示我的健康计划:一项随机试验的研究方案,该试验测试了密苏里州联邦医疗保险市场的决策支持工具。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Feb 16;16:55. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1314-9.
4
When All That Glitters Is Gold: Dominated Plan Choice on Covered California for the 2018 Plan Year.当所有的闪光都是金子:2018 计划年度加州保险交易所的主导计划选择。
Milbank Q. 2021 Dec;99(4):1059-1087. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12518. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
5
Decision-Making Experiences Of Consumers Choosing Individual-Market Health Insurance Plans.消费者选择个体医疗保险计划的决策体验。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Mar;38(3):464-472. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05036.
6
Stakeholders' perceptions of ways to support decisions about health insurance marketplace enrollment: a qualitative study.利益相关者对支持医疗保险市场参保决策方式的看法:一项定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Nov 8;16(1):634. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1890-8.
7
A Randomized Trial Examining Three Strategies for Supporting Health Insurance Decisions among the Uninsured.一项针对三种帮助未参保者做出医疗保险决策策略的随机试验。
Med Decis Making. 2016 Oct;36(7):911-22. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15578635. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
8
Can Plan Recommendations Improve the Coverage Decisions of Vulnerable Populations in Health Insurance Marketplaces?《计划建议能否改善医疗保险市场中弱势群体的覆盖决策?》
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 30;11(3):e0151095. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151095. eCollection 2016.
9
Shopping on the Public and Private Health Insurance Marketplaces: Consumer Decision Aids and Plan Presentation.在公共和私人医疗保险市场购物:消费者决策辅助工具和计划介绍。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Aug;33(8):1400-1410. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4483-x. Epub 2018 May 29.
10
Improving Cancer Patients' Insurance Choices (I Can PIC): A Randomized Trial of a Personalized Health Insurance Decision Aid.改善癌症患者的保险选择(I Can PIC):个性化健康保险决策辅助工具的随机试验。
Oncologist. 2020 Jul;25(7):609-619. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0703. Epub 2020 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Insights on Improving Health Insurance Literacy in Diabetes.提高糖尿病患者健康保险素养的见解。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2025 Feb 25;110(Supplement_2):S175-S186. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgae706.
2
How do citizens with low health insurance literacy choose a health insurance policy in the Netherlands? An interview study.健康保险知识水平较低的荷兰公民如何选择健康保险政策?一项访谈研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1567. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12062-0.
3
Does targeted information impact consumers' preferences for value-based health insurance? Evidence from a survey experiment.

本文引用的文献

1
Stakeholders' perceptions of ways to support decisions about health insurance marketplace enrollment: a qualitative study.利益相关者对支持医疗保险市场参保决策方式的看法:一项定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Nov 8;16(1):634. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1890-8.
2
Moving Beyond Blind Men and Elephants: Providing Total Estimated Annual Costs Improves Health Insurance Decision Making.超越盲人摸象:提供年度总成本估算可改善医疗保险决策。
Med Care Res Rev. 2017 Oct;74(5):625-635. doi: 10.1177/1077558716669210. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
3
For Third Enrollment Period, Marketplaces Expand Decision Support Tools To Assist Consumers.
有针对性的信息会影响消费者对基于价值的健康保险的偏好吗?来自一项调查实验的证据。
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Nov 18;14(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00573-9.
4
INFORMATION GAPS AND HEALTH INSURANCE ENROLLMENT: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act Navigator Programs.信息差距与医疗保险参保:来自《平价医疗法案》导航项目的证据。
Am J Health Econ. 2022 Fall;8(4):477-505. doi: 10.1086/721569. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
5
Health Insurance Literacy Improvements Among Recently Diagnosed Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer: Results From a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.健康保险知识提高 最近诊断患有癌症的青少年和年轻人:一项试点随机对照试验的结果。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2024 Jan;20(1):93-101. doi: 10.1200/OP.23.00171. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
6
Assessing health insurance literacy in Switzerland: first results from a measurement tool.评估瑞士的健康保险知识水平:测量工具的初步结果。
Eur J Public Health. 2024 Apr 3;34(2):237-243. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad190.
7
The Swiss Health Insurance Literacy Measure (HILM-CH): Measurement Properties and Cross-Cultural Validation.瑞士健康保险素养量表(HILM-CH):测量特性和跨文化验证。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jan 26;23(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08986-0.
8
Health insurance literacy among head and neck cancer patients and their caregivers: A cross-sectional pilot study.头颈癌患者及其照顾者的健康保险素养:一项横断面试点研究。
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022 Oct 20;7(6):1820-1829. doi: 10.1002/lio2.940. eCollection 2022 Dec.
9
Health insurance literacy and health services access barriers in Niemann-Pick disease: the patient and caregiver voice.尼曼-匹克病患者和照护者的健康保险知识和健康服务获取障碍:来自患者和照护者的声音。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Sep 2;17(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02490-8.
10
Toward Food Sovereignty for Coastal Communities of Eastern Québec: Co-designing A Website to Support Consumption of Edible Resources from the St. Lawrence River, Estuary, and Gulf.迈向魁北克东部沿海社区的食物主权:共同设计一个网站以支持食用来自圣劳伦斯河、河口和海湾的资源
MDM Policy Pract. 2022 Apr 23;7(1):23814683221094477. doi: 10.1177/23814683221094477. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun.
在第三个参保期,医保市场扩大决策支持工具以帮助消费者。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):680-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1637.
4
Show Me My Health Plans: a study protocol of a randomized trial testing a decision support tool for the federal health insurance marketplace in Missouri.向我展示我的健康计划:一项随机试验的研究方案,该试验测试了密苏里州联邦医疗保险市场的决策支持工具。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Feb 16;16:55. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1314-9.
5
Cost-Sharing Obligations, High-Deductible Health Plan Growth, and Shopping for Health Care: Enrollees With Skin in the Game.费用分摊义务、高免赔额健康保险计划的增长以及医疗保健选购:有切身利益的参保人。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Mar;176(3):395-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7554.
6
Smart Choice Health Insurance©: A New, Interdisciplinary Program to Enhance Health Insurance Literacy.明智选择健康保险©:一项提高健康保险素养的全新跨学科计划。
Health Promot Pract. 2016 Mar;17(2):209-16. doi: 10.1177/1524839915620393. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
7
Access To Care And Affordability Have Improved Following Affordable Care Act Implementation; Problems Remain.《平价医疗法案》实施后,医疗服务可及性和可负担性有所改善;但问题依然存在。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Jan;35(1):161-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0755. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
8
Insurance plan presentation and decision support on HealthCare.gov and state-based web sites created for the Affordable Care Act.为《平价医疗法案》在HealthCare.gov及各州网站上创建的保险计划展示与决策支持。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Aug 18;163(4):327-8. doi: 10.7326/L15-5127.
9
Seeing Health Insurance and HealthCare.gov Through the Eyes of Young Adults.从年轻人的视角看健康保险和 HealthCare.gov。
J Adolesc Health. 2015 Aug;57(2):137-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.04.017. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
10
The problem of underinsurance and how rising deductibles will make it worse. Findings from the Commonwealth Fund Biennial Health Insurance Survey, 2014.保险不足的问题以及免赔额上升将如何使其恶化。英联邦基金2014年两年期医疗保险调查结果。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2015 May;13:1-20.