Feil Katharina, Heinrich Johanna, von Falkenhausen Aenne S, Becker Regina, Küpper Clemens, Müller Katharina, Thunstedt Dennis C, Sinner Moritz F, Kääb Stefan, Kellert Lars
Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
Case Rep Neurol. 2020 Jan 29;12(1):45-49. doi: 10.1159/000505180. eCollection 2020 Jan-Apr.
So far, there has been no generally accepted diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm for patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). As recent clinical trials on secondary stroke prevention in ESUS did not support the use of oral anticoagulation and the concept of ESUS comprises heterogeneous subgroups of patients, including a wide age range, concomitant patent foramen ovale (PFO), variable cardiovascular risk factors as well as a variable probability for atrial fibrillation (AF), an individualized clinical approach is needed. In this context, we here present a case of recurrent stroke in a young patient with ESUS and PFO. During treatment according to our Catch-up-ESUS registry study, prolonged cardiac monitoring diagnosed AF, and PFO closure was omitted.
到目前为止,对于来源不明的栓塞性卒中(ESUS)患者,尚未有普遍接受的诊断和治疗方案。由于近期关于ESUS二级预防的临床试验不支持使用口服抗凝药,且ESUS的概念包含不同亚组的患者,包括年龄范围广泛、伴有卵圆孔未闭(PFO)、心血管危险因素各异以及房颤(AF)发生概率不同,因此需要个体化的临床方法。在此背景下,我们在此介绍一例患有ESUS和PFO的年轻患者复发性卒中的病例。在根据我们的“追赶性ESUS”登记研究进行治疗期间,延长的心脏监测诊断出房颤,于是省略了PFO封堵术。