MacRae Cassie B, Weinberg Seth H, Weinberg Mitchell L
Acad Forensic Pathol. 2019 Sep;9(3-4):181-190. doi: 10.1177/1925362119895599. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
Studies have demonstrated that autopsy is the gold standard for determining cause and manner of death. Indeed, the current National Association of Medical Examiners standard B3.7 states that a forensic pathologist (FP) shall perform a forensic autopsy when the death is by apparent intoxication by alcohol, drugs, or poison. Unfortunately, the recent increase in drug-related deaths has led to some question about the feasibility of maintaining compliance with standard B3.7. We constructed a voluntary survey to address consensus on standard B3.7 and the use of supervised accredited pathologists' assistants (PAs) in performing select medicolegal autopsies. Additional questions were included to help characterize variables related to FP's workload and experience. Each of these variables was predicted to influence FP's attitudes toward B3.7 and the use of PAs. Our respondent pool (n = 107) consisted primarily of actively practicing FPs with administrative responsibilities (42%) and actively practicing FPs without administrative responsibilities (41%). Sixty-five percent agreed that standard B3.7 is appropriate. Opinion on the use of PAs was split between those who agreed (45%) and those who did not (44%). Tendency to agree with either B3.7 or the use of PAs was not a function of FP's individual or office workload; however, respondents were more likely to agree with B3.7 if they previously experienced a case where internal autopsy findings radically altered diagnosis in an otherwise suggestive overdose case (P < 0.001). In certain offices and under certain conditions, the use of PAs may be one solution to ensuring all potential overdose deaths receive an autopsy.
研究表明,尸检是确定死因和死亡方式的金标准。事实上,目前美国国家法医协会的标准B3.7规定,当死亡原因明显是酒精、药物或毒物中毒时,法医病理学家(FP)应进行法医尸检。不幸的是,最近与药物相关的死亡人数增加,引发了一些关于是否能够继续遵守标准B3.7的可行性问题。我们开展了一项自愿调查,以探讨对标准B3.7的共识,以及在进行某些法医学尸检时使用经认可的有监督的病理学家助理(PAs)的情况。还纳入了其他问题,以帮助描述与FP工作量和经验相关的变量。预计这些变量中的每一个都会影响FP对B3.7和使用PAs的态度。我们的受访者群体(n = 107)主要由积极执业且负有行政责任的FP(42%)和积极执业但不负有行政责任的FP(41%)组成。65%的人同意标准B3.7是合适的。对于使用PAs的意见存在分歧,同意的人占45%,不同意的人占44%。同意B3.7或使用PAs的倾向并非取决于FP的个人或办公室工作量;然而,如果受访者之前经历过内部尸检结果在其他方面疑似药物过量的病例中彻底改变诊断的情况,他们更有可能同意B3.7(P < 0.001)。在某些办公室和特定条件下,使用PAs可能是确保所有潜在药物过量死亡病例都能接受尸检的一种解决方案。