Prahlow Samuel P, Prahlow Joseph A
Acad Forensic Pathol. 2019 Sep;9(3-4):225-238. doi: 10.1177/1925362119895598. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
Deaths related to hostage situations occur in many forms, as these situations can easily escalate as a result of many confounding variables. When approaching such cases, forensic pathologists and death investigators should be mindful of the many details that should be well-documented at the scene and during autopsy to ensure that the correct conclusions and death certification are determined. This case report highlights a death in a hostage situation and the importance of correlating scene information and autopsy findings. An elderly female hostage was ambulating with a walker away from her ex-husband's home, after police negotiations successfully convinced her ex-husband to release her. The ex-husband then appeared at the door, brandishing a weapon, at which time a police officer shot at the man. Instead of striking the man, the rifle's projectile struck the woman in the chest. Subsequent investigation revealed that, although the police officer had a "clear shot" via the rifle sights, the muzzle end of the rifle was obstructed by the back corner of an automobile, behind which the officer was positioned during the hostage situation standoff. The case highlights a rarely discussed safety rule related to firearms: recognition that the line of sight via a weapon's sights (or scope) is not identical to the barrel/bore axis.
与劫持人质事件相关的死亡有多种形式,因为这些情况很容易因许多混杂变量而升级。在处理此类案件时,法医病理学家和死亡调查人员应注意许多细节,这些细节应在现场和尸检过程中得到妥善记录,以确保得出正确结论并确定死亡证明。本病例报告突出了一起劫持人质事件中的死亡情况以及关联现场信息和尸检结果的重要性。一名老年女性人质在警方谈判成功说服她的前夫释放她后,正拄着助行器离开前夫家。随后,前夫出现在门口,挥舞着武器,此时一名警察向该男子开枪。然而,步枪子弹并未击中该男子,而是击中了女子的胸部。随后的调查显示,尽管警察通过步枪瞄准具获得了“清晰的射击视野”,但步枪枪口被一辆汽车的后角挡住,在劫持人质对峙期间,警察就位于这辆汽车后面。该案例突出了一条很少被讨论的与枪支有关的安全规则:认识到通过武器瞄准具(或瞄准镜)的视线与枪管/膛轴并不相同。