Suppr超能文献

面部与牙中线与面部及口腔解剖标志之间关系的评估。

Assessment of the Relationship Between Facial and Dental Midlines with Anatomical Landmarks of the Face and Oral Cavity.

作者信息

Farahani Abolfazl, Jafari Karim, Hemmati Ali, Naghizadeh Abbas, Nemati Rahman, Farahani Mohammad Hossein

机构信息

Private Practice, Arak, Iran.

Department of Prosthodontics, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences School of Dentistry, Ardabil, Iran.

出版信息

Turk J Orthod. 2019 Dec 1;32(4):200-206. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18086. eCollection 2019 Dec.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present study was to determine the facial anatomical landmarks, in order of accuracy, closest to the midline of the face, as well as oral cavity midline, and to specify which intraoral anatomical landmarks are closer to the dental midline.

METHODS

Three commonly used anatomical landmarks including nasion, nose, and philtrum tips were marked clinically in 108 subjects. A frontal full-face digital image was used for midline analysis in accordance with the esthetic frame. Deviations from the facial and oral midlines were measured for the three clinical landmarks. Dental midline was considered as the fourth landmark. Alginate impressions were taken, and casts were analyzed under standardized conditions. The labial frenum and incisive papilla were marked. Cast images were taken and analyzed.

RESULTS

Data showed difference between the mean ratios of the selected anatomical landmarks and the facial and oral midlines (p≤0/05). The anatomical landmark hierarchies, in proximity to the facial midline, are commissural midlines, nasion, philtrum tip, nose tip, and dental midline, respectively. The anatomical landmark hierarchies, in proximity to the commissural midline, include dental midline, philtrum tip, nose tip, and nasion. The labial frenum was less deviated from the dental midline than the incisive papilla.

CONCLUSION

With respect to shortcomings, the results showed that all of the anatomical landmarks were deviated from the facial and oral midlines. The order of proximity of the anatomical landmarks to the facial midline was as follows: commissural midline, nasion, philtrum, and dental midline.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是确定面部解剖标志点,按照与面部中线及口腔中线接近程度的准确性顺序排列,并明确哪些口腔内解剖标志点更接近牙中线。

方法

在108名受试者身上临床标记了三个常用的解剖标志点,包括鼻根点、鼻尖和人中切迹。使用正面全脸数字图像,根据美学框架进行中线分析。测量这三个临床标志点与面部和口腔中线的偏差。将牙中线视为第四个标志点。制取藻酸盐印模,并在标准化条件下分析模型。标记唇系带和切牙乳头。拍摄模型图像并进行分析。

结果

数据显示所选解剖标志点与面部和口腔中线的平均比例存在差异(p≤0.05)。接近面部中线的解剖标志点层次依次为口角中线、鼻根点、人中切迹、鼻尖和牙中线。接近口角中线的解剖标志点层次包括牙中线、人中切迹、鼻尖和鼻根点。唇系带比切牙乳头离牙中线的偏差更小。

结论

关于不足之处,结果显示所有解剖标志点均偏离面部和口腔中线。解剖标志点与面部中线接近程度的顺序如下:口角中线、鼻根点、人中、牙中线。

相似文献

9
Diagnostic accuracy of intraoral photographic orthodontic records.口腔摄影正畸记录的诊断准确性。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019 Jan;31(1):64-71. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12426. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
10
Horizontal change of philtrum after orthognathic surgery in patients with facial asymmetry.面部不对称患者正颌手术后人中的水平变化。
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Nov 13;41(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s40902-019-0232-2. eCollection 2019 Dec.

本文引用的文献

4
Concurrence between the maxillary midline and bisector to the interpupillary line.上颌中线与瞳孔间线平分线的重合。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2009;21(1):37-41; discussion 42. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2008.00229.x.
7
Public preferences for anterior tooth variations: a web-based study.
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2002;14(2):97-106. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2002.tb00158.x.
10
Fifteen-year reproducibility of natural head posture: A longitudinal study.自然头位的15年可重复性:一项纵向研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 Jul;116(1):82-5. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70306-9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验