Wen Aonan, Zhu Yujia, Xiao Ning, Gao Zixiang, Zhang Yun, Wang Yong, Wang Shengjin, Zhao Yijiao
Center of Digital Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & NHC Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry, Beijing 100081, China.
Institute of Medical Technology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 13;13(6):1086. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061086.
(1) Background: Three-dimensional (3D) facial anatomical landmarks are the premise and foundation of facial morphology analysis. At present, there is no ideal automatic determination method for 3D facial anatomical landmarks. This research aims to realize the automatic determination of 3D facial anatomical landmarks based on the non-rigid registration algorithm developed by our research team and to evaluate its landmark localization accuracy. (2) Methods: A 3D facial scanner, Face Scan, was used to collect 3D facial data of 20 adult males without significant facial deformities. Using the radial basis function optimized non-rigid registration algorithm, TH-OCR, developed by our research team (experimental group: TH group) and the non-rigid registration algorithm, MeshMonk (control group: MM group), a 3D face template constructed in our previous research was deformed and registered to each participant's data. The automatic determination of 3D facial anatomical landmarks was realized according to the index of 32 facial anatomical landmarks determined on the 3D face template. Considering these 32 facial anatomical landmarks manually selected by experts on the 3D facial data as the gold standard, the distance between the automatically determined and the corresponding manually selected facial anatomical landmarks was calculated as the "landmark localization error" to evaluate the effect and feasibility of the automatic determination method (template method). (3) Results: The mean landmark localization error of all facial anatomical landmarks in the TH and MM groups was 2.34 ± 1.76 mm and 2.16 ± 1.97 mm, respectively. The automatic determination of the anatomical landmarks in the middle face was better than that in the upper and lower face in both groups. Further, the automatic determination of anatomical landmarks in the center of the face was better than in the marginal part. (4) Conclusions: In this study, the automatic determination of 3D facial anatomical landmarks was realized based on non-rigid registration algorithms. There is no significant difference in the automatic landmark localization accuracy between the TH-OCR algorithm and the MeshMonk algorithm, and both can meet the needs of oral clinical applications to a certain extent.
(1) 背景:三维(3D)面部解剖标志点是面部形态分析的前提和基础。目前,尚无理想的3D面部解剖标志点自动确定方法。本研究旨在基于本研究团队开发的非刚性配准算法实现3D面部解剖标志点的自动确定,并评估其标志点定位精度。(2) 方法:使用3D面部扫描仪Face Scan收集20名无明显面部畸形的成年男性的3D面部数据。利用本研究团队开发的径向基函数优化非刚性配准算法TH-OCR(实验组:TH组)和非刚性配准算法MeshMonk(对照组:MM组),将我们之前研究中构建的3D面部模板变形并配准到每个参与者的数据上。根据在3D面部模板上确定的32个面部解剖标志点的指标实现3D面部解剖标志点的自动确定。将专家在3D面部数据上手动选择的这32个面部解剖标志点作为金标准,计算自动确定的与相应手动选择的面部解剖标志点之间的距离作为“标志点定位误差”,以评估自动确定方法(模板法)的效果和可行性。(3) 结果:TH组和MM组所有面部解剖标志点的平均标志点定位误差分别为2.34±1.76 mm和2.16±1.97 mm。两组中面部中部解剖标志点的自动确定均优于上、下面部。此外,面部中央解剖标志点的自动确定优于边缘部分。(4) 结论:本研究基于非刚性配准算法实现了3D面部解剖标志点的自动确定。TH-OCR算法和MeshMonk算法在自动标志点定位精度上无显著差异,且在一定程度上均能满足口腔临床应用的需求。