Korbmacher Birgit, Atorf Jenny, Fridrichs-Gromoll Stephanie, Hill Marilyn, Korte Sven, Kremers Jan, Mansfield Keith, Mecklenburg Lars, Pilling Andrew, Wiederhold Andreas
Covance Preclinical Services GmbH, Kesselfeld 29, 48163 Münster, Germany.
Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 2, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Primate Biol. 2017 Apr 28;4(1):93-100. doi: 10.5194/pb-4-93-2017. eCollection 2017.
To safeguard patients, regulatory authorities require that new drugs that are to be given by the intravitreal (IVT) route are assessed for their safety in a laboratory species using the same route of administration. Due to the high similarity of ocular morphology and physiology between humans and nonhuman primates (NHPs) and due to the species specificity of many biotherapeutics, the monkey is often the only appropriate model. To this end, intravitreal administration and assessment of ocular toxicity are well established in cynomolgus monkeys (). In contrast, the common marmoset monkey () is not a standard model for ocular toxicity studies due to its general sensitivity to laboratory investigations and small eye size. It was the purpose of the present work to study whether the marmoset is a useful alternative to the cynomolgus monkey for use in intravitreal toxicological studies. Six marmoset monkeys received repeated (every 2 weeks for a total of four doses) intravitreal injections of 10 or 20 L of a placebo. The animals were assessed for measurements of intraocular pressure (IOP), standard ophthalmological investigations and electroretinography (ERG). At the end of the dosing period, the animals were sacrificed and the eyes were evaluated histologically. ERG revealed similar results when comparing predose to end-of-study data, and there was no difference between the two dose volumes. A transient increase in the IOP was seen immediately after dosing, which was more pronounced after dosing of 20 L compared to 10 L. Ophthalmologic and microscopic observations did not show any significant changes. Therefore, it can be concluded that 10 L as well as 20 L intravitreal injections of a placebo are well tolerated in the marmoset. These results demonstrate that the common marmoset is an alternative to the cynomolgus monkey for intravitreal toxicity testing.
为保护患者,监管机构要求,拟通过玻璃体内(IVT)途径给药的新药,需在实验动物中采用相同给药途径评估其安全性。由于人类与非人灵长类动物(NHPs)的眼部形态和生理高度相似,且许多生物治疗药物具有物种特异性,猴子通常是唯一合适的模型。为此,食蟹猴玻璃体内给药及眼毒性评估已很成熟()。相比之下,普通狨猴()由于对实验室研究普遍敏感且眼睛较小,并非眼毒性研究的标准模型。本研究的目的是探讨狨猴是否可作为食蟹猴的有用替代动物用于玻璃体内毒理学研究。六只狨猴接受了重复(每2周一次,共四剂)玻璃体内注射10或20μL安慰剂。对动物进行眼压(IOP)测量、标准眼科检查和视网膜电图(ERG)评估。在给药期结束时,处死动物并对眼睛进行组织学评估。将给药前数据与研究结束时的数据进行比较时,ERG显示出相似的结果,且两种剂量体积之间无差异。给药后立即观察到眼压短暂升高,与10μL相比,20μL给药后更为明显。眼科和显微镜观察未显示任何显著变化。因此,可以得出结论,狨猴对10μL和20μL玻璃体内注射安慰剂均具有良好的耐受性。这些结果表明,普通狨猴可作为食蟹猴的替代动物用于玻璃体内毒性测试。