San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
Health Educ Behav. 2020 Aug;47(4):549-555. doi: 10.1177/1090198120902763. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
Participatory action research (PAR), community-based participatory research, and other participatory approaches continue to gain popularity within the field of public health and allied disciplines in an effort to democratize the production of knowledge and contribute to sustainable community health improvements. Consequently, more students and early-career scholars will elect to incorporate participatory approaches in their dissertations and other early-career research studies in an effort to meaningfully influence community health equity in a variety of contexts. While there is a growing body of literature on the processes and challenges involved in PAR, community-based participatory research, and other participatory research, early-career scholars infrequently critically reflect on and detail learnings from their participatory research studies in the academic literature. I respond to this gap by sharing and reflecting on three critical learning points from my own youth-led PAR dissertation study examining how youth of color experience aging out of LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer or questioning)-supportive youth services. In particular, I interrogate how the processes in our academic-youth partner collaboration shaped the possibility of a mutually beneficial praxis and offer recommendations to other early-career scholars embarking on their own participatory research studies.
参与式行动研究(PAR)、以社区为基础的参与式研究和其他参与式方法在公共卫生领域和相关学科中继续流行,旨在使知识的产生民主化,并促进社区健康的可持续改善。因此,越来越多的学生和早期职业学者将选择在他们的论文和其他早期职业研究中纳入参与式方法,努力在各种情况下对社区健康公平产生有意义的影响。虽然关于 PAR、以社区为基础的参与式研究和其他参与式研究的过程和挑战的文献越来越多,但早期职业学者很少在学术文献中批判性地反思和详细阐述他们参与式研究的经验教训。我通过分享和反思自己的一项关于青年主导的 PAR 论文研究的三个关键学习点来回应这一差距,该研究探讨了有色人种青年如何经历 LGBTQ(女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和 queer 或质疑)支持性青年服务的“长大成人”。具体来说,我探讨了我们的学术-青年伙伴合作中的过程如何塑造互利实践的可能性,并为其他从事自己的参与式研究的早期职业学者提供建议。