• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与 LGBTQ 社区的社区伙伴参与式研究:从抗抑郁差异研究中获得的经验教训。

Engaging LGBTQ Communities in Community-Partnered Participatory Research: Lessons from the Resilience Against Depression Disparities Study.

出版信息

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2021;15(1):65-74. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2021.0006.

DOI:10.1353/cpr.2021.0006
PMID:33775962
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Resilience Against Depression Disparities (RADD), a community partnered, randomized comparative effectiveness study, aimed to address mental health in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer/Questioning (LGBTQ) racial/ethnic populations in New Orleans and Los Angeles.

OBJECTIVES

To describe engagement methods, lessons learned, and recommendations in engaging LGBTQ individuals and agencies throughout the RADD study.

METHODS

RADD used a community partnered participatory research framework to engage LGBTQ community members and agencies. Observational and quantitative data were collected to describe engagement activities and study adaptations from October 2016 to May 2019.

RESULTS

Our partnered approach resulted in multiple study adaptations. The principles of cultural humility, coleadership, and addressing health determinants were important to successful engagement with LGBTQ community members and study participants. We recommend maintaining cultural humility as the tenant of all research activities.

CONCLUSIONS

This project's engagement plan demonstrates that community-academic partnerships can be forged to create and modify existing study models for LGBTQ communities.

摘要

背景

“抗抑郁差异韧性研究”(RADD)是一项社区合作的随机对照有效性研究,旨在解决新奥尔良和洛杉矶的女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿/疑问(LGBTQ)种族/族裔人群的心理健康问题。

目的

描述在整个 RADD 研究中,与 LGBTQ 个人和机构合作的参与方法、经验教训和建议。

方法

RADD 使用社区合作参与式研究框架来吸引 LGBTQ 社区成员和机构。从 2016 年 10 月至 2019 年 5 月,收集观察性和定量数据来描述参与活动和研究调整。

结果

我们的合作方法导致了多项研究调整。文化谦逊、共同领导和解决健康决定因素的原则对于与 LGBTQ 社区成员和研究参与者的成功参与至关重要。我们建议将文化谦逊作为所有研究活动的基础。

结论

该项目的参与计划表明,社区-学术伙伴关系可以建立起来,为 LGBTQ 社区创建和修改现有的研究模型。

相似文献

1
Engaging LGBTQ Communities in Community-Partnered Participatory Research: Lessons from the Resilience Against Depression Disparities Study.参与 LGBTQ 社区的社区伙伴参与式研究:从抗抑郁差异研究中获得的经验教训。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2021;15(1):65-74. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2021.0006.
2
Resilience Against Depression Disparities (RADD): a protocol for a randomised comparative effectiveness trial for depression among predominantly low-income, racial/ethnic, sexual and gender minorities.抗抑郁差异韧性(RADD)研究:一项针对主要为低收入、少数族裔/族裔、性少数和性别少数群体的抑郁症的随机对照有效性试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 22;9(10):e031099. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031099.
3
The Impact of Generative Conversational Artificial Intelligence on the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Community: Scoping Review.生成式对话人工智能对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿群体的影响:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 6;25:e52091. doi: 10.2196/52091.
4
Nutrition and Health in the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer/Questioning Community: A Narrative Review.女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、酷儿/疑问社区中的营养与健康:叙事评论。
Adv Nutr. 2023 Nov;14(6):1297-1306. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.07.009. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
5
Community-Engaged Participatory Methods to Address Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Questioning Young People's Health Information Needs With a Resource Website: Participatory Design and Development Study.通过资源网站采用社区参与式方法满足女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、酷儿及性取向存疑的年轻人的健康信息需求:参与式设计与开发研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Sep 7;7:e41682. doi: 10.2196/41682.
6
LGBTQ+ Grassroots Activism: An Opportunity for Resilience.LGBTQ+ 草根行动主义:韧性的机会。
J Homosex. 2023 Jul 29;70(9):1675-1700. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2022.2040928. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
7
"We're always an afterthought"- Designing tobacco control campaigns for dissemination with and to LGBTQ +-serving community organizations: a thematic analysis.“我们总是被忽视的一方”——为 LGBTQ 服务的社区组织设计传播烟草控制活动的主题分析。
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Aug;34(8):673-682. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01706-x. Epub 2023 May 9.
8
The process of developing a community-based research agenda with lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer youth in the Northwest Territories, Canada.在加拿大西北地区与女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿青年共同制定基于社区的研究议程的过程。
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2015 Aug 24;74:28188. doi: 10.3402/ijch.v74.28188. eCollection 2015.
9
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and gender diverse and queer (LGBTQ) community members' perspectives on palliative care in New South Wales (NSW), Australia.澳大利亚新南威尔士州(NSW)的女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和性别多样化(LGBTQ)群体对姑息治疗的看法。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e5926-e5945. doi: 10.1111/hsc.14024. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
10
Health Disparities Among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Older Adults: A Structural Competency Approach.老年男女同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿群体中的健康不平等:一种结构能力方法。
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2024 Jan;98(1):39-55. doi: 10.1177/00914150231171838. Epub 2023 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Study protocol for the Rainbow Austrian Longitudinal Family (RALF) study: a longitudinal, multi-method, multi-rater investigation of risk and resilience factors in Austrian LGBTQ+ parent families.奥地利彩虹纵向家庭(RALF)研究的研究方案:一项对奥地利 LGBTQ+ 父母家庭中的风险和复原力因素进行纵向、多方法、多评估者的调查。
BMC Psychol. 2025 May 26;13(1):560. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02828-4.
2
"Feeling Like You Matter:" LGBTQ + Young Adult Perspectives on Affirmative Mental Healthcare.“感觉自己很重要”:LGBTQ+青年成人对肯定性心理保健的看法
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan;52(1):155-167. doi: 10.1007/s11414-024-09919-x. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
3
Community-Engaged Participatory Methods to Address Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Questioning Young People's Health Information Needs With a Resource Website: Participatory Design and Development Study.
通过资源网站采用社区参与式方法满足女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、酷儿及性取向存疑的年轻人的健康信息需求:参与式设计与开发研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Sep 7;7:e41682. doi: 10.2196/41682.
4
Inequities in Medically Assisted Reproduction: a Scoping Review.医学辅助生殖中的不平等:范围综述。
Reprod Sci. 2023 Aug;30(8):2373-2396. doi: 10.1007/s43032-023-01236-6. Epub 2023 Apr 26.