Servais Julie, Vanhoutte Bram, Maddy Herby, Godin Isabelle
School of Public Health, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Faculty of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Int J Transgend Health. 2024 Mar 13;25(3):419-438. doi: 10.1080/26895269.2024.2323524. eCollection 2024.
Research with transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) young people is essential to understand their experiences and to be able to propose, implement and adapt 'services' in the broadest sense to meet their needs. However, research outside clinical settings on current experiences and needs of youth under the age of 18 is limited which hinders the development of knowledge on TGD, as well as the development of research informed support practices. Acquiring parental consent for participatory research may present ethical and logistical difficulties, as it could jeopardize the safety, well-being, or confidentiality of adolescent participants. This creates a tension between the adolescent's right to autonomy, privacy, freedom, and all aspects related to the consent of the underage on the one hand, and the parents' right to protect their child on the other hand. This review aims to identify the methodological and ethical challenges associated with participatory research with transgender and gender-diverse young people.
We systematically searched bibliometric databases for studies published between 2006 and 2022 and included 4 main conceptual groups: transgender and gender non-conforming, adolescence, qualitative research (including participatory research) and consent. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022368360) in November 2022.
Of the 3,794 articles initially identified, 291 met the inclusion criteria and 48 were examined. The selected studies were analyzed in the light of four main ethical tensions: involving parents or a trusted person in the consent gathering process, ensuring the protection and safety of young people while respecting confidentiality, and ensuring that spaces are created for transgender and gender-diverse young people to express themselves freely as part of an empowering research process. At the same time, several methodological challenges concerning public and stakeholder participation and recruitment, data collection and analysis as well as research integrity emerged from the selected studies.
CONCLUSION & IMPLICATIONS: The existing literature of participatory research involving young transgender and gender-diverse individuals underscores the intricate and conflicting aspects, especially concerning power dynamics, empowerment, and the researcher's role. The relevance of these findings extends across various legal frameworks and is applicable to multiple contexts and countries.
对跨性别和性别多样化(TGD)的年轻人进行研究对于了解他们的经历至关重要,并且能够从最广泛的意义上提出、实施和调整“服务”以满足他们的需求。然而,在临床环境之外针对18岁以下青少年当前经历和需求的研究有限,这阻碍了对TGD知识的发展,以及基于研究的支持实践的发展。获得父母对参与性研究的同意可能会带来伦理和后勤方面的困难,因为这可能会危及青少年参与者的安全、福祉或保密性。这在青少年的自主权、隐私权、自由权以及与未成年人同意相关的所有方面的权利与父母保护其子女的权利之间造成了紧张关系。本综述旨在确定与跨性别和性别多样化的年轻人进行参与性研究相关的方法和伦理挑战。
我们系统地检索了文献计量数据库,以查找2006年至2022年期间发表的研究,并纳入了4个主要概念组:跨性别和性别不符合规范者、青少年、定性研究(包括参与性研究)和同意。本综述于2022年11月在PROSPERO(CRD42022368360)上注册。
在最初识别的3794篇文章中,291篇符合纳入标准,48篇进行了审查。所选研究根据四个主要伦理紧张关系进行了分析:在同意收集过程中让父母或受信任的人参与、在尊重保密性的同时确保年轻人的保护和安全,以及确保为跨性别和性别多样化的年轻人创造空间,让他们作为赋权研究过程的一部分自由表达自己。同时,所选研究还出现了一些关于公众和利益相关者参与及招募、数据收集与分析以及研究诚信的方法学挑战。
现有的涉及跨性别和性别多样化青少年的参与性研究文献强调了复杂和冲突的方面,特别是在权力动态、赋权和研究者角色方面。这些发现的相关性跨越各种法律框架,适用于多个背景和国家。