Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-Ro, Chongno-Gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Department of Psychiatry, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, 31116, Republic of Korea.
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 28;20(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02505-3.
The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Korean version of Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) on a sample of Korean youths and to examine the cross-cultural differences in adolescents' anxiety.
Our study included 147 adolescents (ages 12-17, 92 girls), 93 with major depressive disorder and 54 as controls. Participants were evaluated using the Kiddie-Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL), SCARED, Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), Disruptive Behavioral Disorder Scale (DBD) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS). Pearson's r and Cronbach's α values of the SCARED were calculated, and exploratory factor analysis was conducted.
The Korean SCARED scores were correlated with the total anxiety scores of K-SADS-PL (r = 0.74) and the CBCL anxious/depressed subscale scores (r = 0.35). Results showed a five-factor structure with good internal consistency, in which some items were loaded on different factors compared to previous studies.
The Korean SCARED demonstrated promising psychometric properties, and could be a valid scale for screening anxiety symptoms in primary care. The fact that different items comprised the factors may reflect the cultural difference between United States and Korea in experiencing anxiety.
本研究旨在检验韩国版 Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders(SCARED)在韩国青少年样本中的心理测量特性,并检验青少年焦虑的跨文化差异。
我们的研究包括 147 名青少年(年龄 12-17 岁,92 名女孩),其中 93 名患有重度抑郁症,54 名作为对照组。参与者使用 Kiddie-Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version(K-SADS-PL)、SCARED、儿童行为检查表(CBCL)、破坏性行为障碍量表(DBD)和注意力缺陷多动障碍评定量表(ADHD-RS)进行评估。计算了 SCARED 的 Pearson's r 和 Cronbach's α 值,并进行了探索性因子分析。
韩国版 SCARED 评分与 K-SADS-PL 的总焦虑评分(r=0.74)和 CBCL 焦虑/抑郁子量表评分(r=0.35)相关。结果显示,与之前的研究相比,该量表具有良好的内部一致性,具有五因子结构,其中一些项目被加载到不同的因子上。
韩国版 SCARED 具有良好的心理测量特性,可作为初级保健中筛查焦虑症状的有效工具。不同项目组成不同因子的事实可能反映了美国和韩国在经历焦虑方面的文化差异。