Department of Ophthalmology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200, Berlin, Germany.
Clinical Trial Centre Cologne (CTCC), University of Cologne, Gleueler Str. 269, 50935, Cologne, Germany.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr;258(4):869-878. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04618-7. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
To demonstrate superiority of intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg compared to focal and peripheral laser treatment in patients with radiation retinopathy for choroidal melanoma.
Inclusion criteria were as follows: patients with radiation retinopathy and visual acuity impairment due to radiation maculopathy accessible for laser therapy, age ≥ 18 years, and BCVA less than 20/32. The main objective was to study the change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) over 6 months from ranibizumab 0.5 mg (experimental) compared to focal laser of the macula and panretinal laser treatment of the ischemic retina (control) in patients with radiation retinopathy in choroidal melanoma. The secondary objectives of the radiation retinopathy study were to compare functional and anatomical results between ranibizumab and laser group over 12 months and to measure the frequency of vitreous hemorrhage and rubeosis iridis.
The intention-to-treat analysis included 31 patients assigned to ranibizumab (n = 15) or laser treatment (n = 16). In terms of BCVA at month 6, ranibizumab was superior to laser treatment, with an advantage of 0.14 logMAR, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.25, p = 0.030. The positive effect of ranibizumab disappeared after treatment was discontinued. Similar results without statistically significant difference were found with respect to macular thickness. In both groups, no change was observed at month 6 in the size of ischemia in the macula or periphery compared to baseline. There was 1 case of vitreous hemorrhage in the laser group and no case of rubeosis iridis over time.
This study showed a statistically significant improvement in visual acuity and clear superiority of ranibizumab compared to laser treatment up to 26 weeks, but this effect disappeared at week 52 after completion of intravitreal treatment. Ranibizumab and PRP are considered equivalent in terms of the non-appearance of proliferative radiation retinopathy during the study.
EudraCT Number: 2011-004463-69.
证明与局部和周边激光治疗相比,脉络膜黑色素瘤放射性视网膜病变患者玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗 0.5mg 的优越性。
纳入标准如下:患有放射性视网膜病变且因放射性黄斑病变而导致视力损害,可接受激光治疗、年龄≥18 岁、BCVA<20/32。主要目的是研究与局部激光治疗黄斑和全视网膜激光治疗缺血性视网膜(对照组)相比,雷珠单抗 0.5mg(实验组)治疗脉络膜黑色素瘤放射性视网膜病变患者 6 个月时最佳矫正视力(BCVA)的变化。该放射性视网膜病变研究的次要目标是比较雷珠单抗和激光组在 12 个月时的功能和解剖学结果,并测量玻璃体积血和新生血管性青光眼的发生率。
意向治疗分析包括 31 名患者,分为雷珠单抗组(n=15)或激光治疗组(n=16)。在第 6 个月时的 BCVA 方面,雷珠单抗优于激光治疗,优势为 0.14 logMAR,95%CI 0.01 至 0.25,p=0.030。停止治疗后,雷珠单抗的积极作用消失。在黄斑厚度方面也发现了类似但无统计学意义的结果。在两组中,与基线相比,第 6 个月时黄斑或周边缺血面积均无变化。激光组有 1 例玻璃体积血,无新生血管性青光眼病例。
这项研究表明,在视力方面有显著的改善,与激光治疗相比,雷珠单抗具有明显的优势,持续至 26 周,但在玻璃体腔内治疗结束后的第 52 周,这种效果消失。雷珠单抗和 PRP 在研究期间没有出现增生性放射性视网膜病变,被认为是等效的。
EudraCT 编号:2011-004463-69。