Fang Andrew M, Rosen Jennifer, Saidian Ava, Bae Sejong, Tanno Fabio Y, Chambo Jose L, Bloom Jonathan, Gordetsky Jennifer, Srougi Victor, Phillips John, Rais-Bahrami Soroush
Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Faculty Office Tower 1107, 510 20th Street South, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA.
Division of Preventative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
J Robot Surg. 2020 Dec;14(6):849-854. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01056-9. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
While multiple studies have demonstrated that minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques are a safe and efficacious approach to adrenalectomy for pheochromocytomas (PC), these studies have only been small comparative studies. The aim of this multi-institutional study is to compare perioperative outcomes between open and MIS, stratified by robotic and conventional laparoscopic, techniques in the surgical management of PC. We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent adrenalectomy for PCs from 2000 to 2017 at three different institutions. Clinical, perioperative, and pathologic parameters were analyzed using t test, Chi square, and Fisher exact statistical measures. Of the 156 adrenalectomy cases performed, 26 (16.7%) were with an open approach and 130 (83.3%) using MIS techniques. Of the MIS procedures, 41 (31.5%) were performed robotically and 89 (68.5%) performed laparoscopically without robotic assistance. Demographic and clinical parameters were similar between the open and MIS groups. Patients, who underwent MIS procedure had a lower complication rate (p = 0.04), shorter hospitalization (p = 0.02), shorter operative time (p < 0.001), and less blood loss (p = 0.002) than those who underwent open surgical resection. Conventional laparoscopic and robotic operative approaches resulted in similar complication rates, length of hospitalization, and blood loss. Our study is one of the largest cohorts comparing the perioperative outcomes between conventional laparoscopic and robotic adrenalectomies in patients with PC. Our results support that MIS techniques have potentially lower morbidity compared to open techniques, while laparoscopic and robotic approaches have similar perioperative outcomes.
虽然多项研究表明,微创手术(MIS)技术是治疗嗜铬细胞瘤(PC)肾上腺切除术的一种安全有效的方法,但这些研究只是小型比较研究。这项多机构研究的目的是比较开放手术和MIS手术在PC手术治疗中的围手术期结果,并按机器人手术和传统腹腔镜手术进行分层。我们回顾性评估了2000年至2017年在三个不同机构接受PC肾上腺切除术的患者。使用t检验、卡方检验和Fisher精确统计方法分析临床、围手术期和病理参数。在156例肾上腺切除病例中,26例(16.7%)采用开放手术,130例(83.3%)采用MIS技术。在MIS手术中,41例(31.5%)采用机器人手术,89例(68.5%)在无机器人辅助的情况下进行腹腔镜手术。开放手术组和MIS组的人口统计学和临床参数相似。接受MIS手术的患者比接受开放手术切除的患者并发症发生率更低(p = 0.04)、住院时间更短(p = 0.02)、手术时间更短(p < 0.001)、失血量更少(p = 0.002)。传统腹腔镜手术和机器人手术方法导致的并发症发生率、住院时间和失血量相似。我们的研究是比较PC患者传统腹腔镜手术和机器人肾上腺切除术围手术期结果的最大队列研究之一。我们的结果支持,与开放技术相比,MIS技术的发病率可能更低,而腹腔镜手术和机器人手术方法的围手术期结果相似。