Suppr超能文献

机器人手术与腹腔镜肾上腺切除术治疗肾上腺肿瘤:围手术期结局的最新荟萃分析

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy for Adrenal Tumors: An Up-to-Date Meta-Analysis on Perioperative Outcomes.

作者信息

Esposito Giuseppe, Mullineris Barbara, Colli Giovanni, Curia Serena, Piccoli Micaela

机构信息

Department of General, Emergency Surgery and New Technologies, Baggiovara General Hospital Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena, Via Pietro Giardini 1355, 41126 Modena, Italy.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 5;17(1):150. doi: 10.3390/cancers17010150.

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for adrenal glands is becoming increasingly developed worldwide and robotic surgery has advanced significantly. Although there are still concerns about the generalization of outcomes and the cost burden, the robotic platform shows several advantages in overcoming some laparoscopic shortcomings. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using the PubMed, MEDLINE and Cochrane library databases of published articles comparing RA and LA up to January 2024. The evaluated endpoints were technical and post-operative outcomes. Dichotomous data were calculated using the odds ratio (OR), while continuous data were analyzed usingmean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). A random-effects model (REM) was applied. By the inclusion of 28 studies, the meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in the rates of intraoperative RBC transfusion, 30-day mortality, intraoperative and overall postoperative complications, re-admission, R1 resection margin and operating time in the RA group compared with the LA. However, the overall cost of hospitalization was significantly higher in the RA group than in the LA group, [MD USD 4101.32, (95% CI 3894.85, 4307.79) < 0.00001]. With respect to the mean intraoperative blood loss, conversion to open surgery rate, time to first flatus and length of hospital stay, the RA group showed slightly statistically significant lower rates than the laparoscopic approach. To our knowledge, this is the largest and most recent meta-analysis that makes these comparisons. RA can be considered safe, feasible and comparable to LA in terms of the intraoperative and post-operative outcomes. In the near future, RA could represent a promising complementary approachto LA for benign and small malignant adrenal masses, particularly in high-volume referral centers specializing in robotic surgery. However, further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

摘要

肾上腺的微创手术(MIS)在全球范围内发展得越来越成熟,机器人手术也取得了显著进展。尽管人们仍对手术效果的推广和成本负担有所担忧,但机器人平台在克服一些腹腔镜手术的缺点方面显示出了诸多优势。利用PubMed、MEDLINE和Cochrane图书馆数据库,对截至2024年1月发表的比较机器人辅助肾上腺切除术(RA)和腹腔镜肾上腺切除术(LA)的文章进行了系统综述和荟萃分析。评估的终点指标为技术和术后结果。二分数据采用比值比(OR)计算,连续数据采用均数差(MD)及95%置信区间(95%CI)进行分析。应用随机效应模型(REM)。纳入28项研究后,荟萃分析显示,与LA组相比,RA组术中红细胞输注率、30天死亡率、术中及术后总体并发症、再次入院率、R1切除边缘和手术时间无统计学显著差异。然而,RA组的总体住院费用显著高于LA组,[MD 4101.32美元,(95%CI 3894.85,4307.79)<0.00001]。在平均术中失血量、中转开腹手术率、首次排气时间和住院时间方面,RA组的数据略低于腹腔镜手术组,且具有统计学显著差异。据我们所知,这是进行这些比较的最大规模且最新的荟萃分析。就术中及术后结果而言,RA可被认为是安全、可行的,且与LA相当。在不久的将来,对于良性和小的恶性肾上腺肿块,RA可能是LA一种有前景的补充方法,尤其是在擅长机器人手术的高容量转诊中心。然而,需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/718c/11719468/6629aeef14bd/cancers-17-00150-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验