Suppr超能文献

肠道准备的使用并不能降低微创或开放性子宫切除术术后感染发病率。

Use of bowel preparation does not reduce postoperative infectious morbidity following minimally invasive or open hysterectomies.

机构信息

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Department of Health Sciences, Division of Health Care Policy and Research & Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; OptumLabs, Cambridge, MA.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):231.e1-231.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.035. Epub 2020 Feb 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Literature on the use of bowel preparation in gynecologic surgery is scarce and limited to minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. The decision on the use of bowel preparation before benign or malignant hysterectomies is mostly driven by extrapolating data from the colorectal literature.

OBJECTIVE

Bowel preparation is a controversial element within enhanced recovery protocols, and literature investigating its efficacy in gynecologic surgery is scarce. Our aim was to determine if mechanical bowel preparation alone, oral antibiotics alone, or a combination are associated with decreased rates of surgical site infections or anastomotic leaks compared to no bowel preparation following benign or malignant hysterectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

We identified women who underwent hysterectomy between January 2006 and July 2017 using OptumLabs, a large US commercial health plan database. Inverse propensity score weighting was used separately for benign and malignant groups to balance baseline characteristics. Primary outcomes of 30-day surgical site infection, anastomotic leaks, and major morbidity were assessed using multivariate logistic regression that adjusted for race, census region, household income, diabetes, and other unbalanced variables following propensity score weighting.

RESULTS

A total of 224,687 hysterectomies (benign, 186,148; malignant, 38,539) were identified. Median age was 45 years for the benign and 54 years for the malignant cohort. Surgical approach was as follows: benign: laparoscopic/robotic, 27.2%; laparotomy, 32.6%; vaginal, 40.2%; malignant: laparoscopic/robotic, 28.8%; laparotomy, 47.7%; vaginal, 23.5%. Bowel resection was performed in 0.4% of the benign and 2.8% of the malignant cohort. Type of bowel preparation was as follows: benign: none, 93.8%; mechanical bowel preparation only, 4.6%; oral antibiotics only, 1.1%; mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics, 0.5%; malignant: none, 87.2%; mechanical bowel preparation only, 9.6%; oral antibiotics only, 1.8%; mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics, 1.4%. Use of bowel preparation did not decrease rates of surgical site infections, anastomotic leaks, or major morbidity following benign or malignant hysterectomy. Among malignant abdominal hysterectomies, there was no difference in the rates of infectious morbidity between mechanical bowel preparation alone, oral antibiotics alone, or mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics, compared to no preparation.

CONCLUSION

Bowel preparation does not protect against surgical site infections or major morbidity following benign or malignant hysterectomy, regardless of surgical approach, and may be safely omitted.

摘要

背景

妇科手术中肠道准备的文献很少,仅限于微创妇科手术。良性或恶性子宫切除术前是否进行肠道准备的决定主要是根据结直肠文献中的数据推断得出的。

目的

肠道准备是加速康复方案中的一个有争议的因素,妇科手术中关于其疗效的文献很少。我们的目的是确定在良性或恶性子宫切除术后,与不进行肠道准备相比,单独使用机械肠道准备、单独使用口服抗生素或联合使用是否与降低手术部位感染或吻合口漏的发生率有关。

研究设计

我们使用美国大型商业健康计划数据库 OptumLabs 确定了 2006 年 1 月至 2017 年 7 月期间接受子宫切除术的女性。良性组和恶性组分别使用逆倾向评分加权法来平衡基线特征。使用多变量逻辑回归评估 30 天手术部位感染、吻合口漏和主要发病率等主要结局,该回归在倾向评分加权后调整了种族、人口普查区域、家庭收入、糖尿病和其他不平衡变量。

结果

共确定了 224687 例子宫切除术(良性 186148 例,恶性 38539 例)。良性组的中位年龄为 45 岁,恶性组为 54 岁。手术方式如下:良性:腹腔镜/机器人,27.2%;剖腹手术,32.6%;阴道手术,40.2%;恶性:腹腔镜/机器人,28.8%;剖腹手术,47.7%;阴道手术,23.5%。良性组中有 0.4%的患者行肠道切除术,恶性组中有 2.8%的患者行肠道切除术。肠道准备的类型如下:良性:无,93.8%;机械肠道准备,4.6%;口服抗生素,1.1%;机械肠道准备联合口服抗生素,0.5%;恶性:无,87.2%;机械肠道准备,9.6%;口服抗生素,1.8%;机械肠道准备联合口服抗生素,1.4%。在良性或恶性子宫切除术后,肠道准备并不能降低手术部位感染、吻合口漏或主要发病率。在恶性腹部子宫切除术患者中,与不准备相比,单独使用机械肠道准备、单独使用口服抗生素或机械肠道准备联合口服抗生素之间,感染发病率无差异。

结论

无论手术方式如何,肠道准备都不能预防良性或恶性子宫切除术后的手术部位感染或主要发病率,并且可以安全地省略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验