Suppr超能文献

阴道子宫切除术中机会性输卵管切除术的风险与益处:一项决策分析

Risks and benefits of opportunistic salpingectomy during vaginal hysterectomy: a decision analysis.

作者信息

Cadish Lauren A, Shepherd Jonathan P, Barber Emma L, Ridgeway Beri

机构信息

Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, CA.

Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;217(5):603.e1-603.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jun 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fallopian tubes are commonly removed during laparoscopic and open hysterectomy to prevent ovarian and tubal cancer but are not routinely removed during vaginal hysterectomy because of perceptions of increased morbidity, difficulty, or inadequate surgical training.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to quantify complications and costs associated with a strategy of planned salpingectomy during vaginal hysterectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

We created a decision analysis model using TreeAgePro. Effectiveness outcomes included ovarian cancer incidence and mortality as well as major surgical complications. Modeled complications included transfusion, conversion to laparotomy or laparoscopy, abscess/hematoma requiring intervention, ileus, readmission, and reoperation within 30 days. We also modeled subsequent benign adnexal surgery beyond the postoperative window. Those whose procedures were converted from a vaginal route were assumed to undergo bilateral salpingectomy, regardless of treatment group, following American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines. Costs were gathered from published literature and Medicare reimbursement data, with internal cost data from 892 hysterectomies at a single institution used to estimate costs when necessary. Complication rates were determined from published literature and from 13,397 vaginal hysterectomies recorded in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2008 through 2013.

RESULTS

Switching from a policy of vaginal hysterectomy alone to a policy of routine planned salpingectomy prevents a diagnosis of ovarian cancer in 1 of every 225 women having surgery and prevents death from ovarian cancer in 1 of every 450 women having surgery. Overall, salpingectomy was a less expensive strategy than not performing salpingectomy ($7350.62 vs $8113.45). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated the driving force behind increased costs was the increased risk of subsequent benign adnexal surgery among women retaining their tubes. Planned opportunistic salpingectomy had more major complications than hysterectomy alone (7.95% vs 7.68%). Major complications included transfusion, conversion to laparotomy or laparoscopy, abscess/hematoma requiring intervention, ileus, readmission, and reoperation within 30 days. Therefore, routine salpingectomy results in 0.61 additional complications per case of cancer prevented and 1.21 additional complications per death prevented. A surgeon therefore must withstand an additional ∼3 complications to prevent 5 cancer diagnoses and ∼6 additional complications to prevent 5 cancer deaths.

CONCLUSION

Salpingectomy should routinely be performed with vaginal hysterectomy because it was the dominant and therefore cost-effective strategy. Complications are minimally increased, but the trade-off with cancer prevention is highly favorable.

摘要

背景

在腹腔镜和开腹子宫切除术中,通常会切除输卵管以预防卵巢癌和输卵管癌,但由于人们认为会增加发病率、手术难度或手术培训不足,在阴道子宫切除术中一般不常规切除输卵管。

目的

我们试图量化阴道子宫切除术中计划性输卵管切除术策略相关的并发症和成本。

研究设计

我们使用TreeAgePro创建了一个决策分析模型。有效性结果包括卵巢癌发病率和死亡率以及主要手术并发症。模拟的并发症包括输血、转为开腹手术或腹腔镜手术、需要干预的脓肿/血肿、肠梗阻、再次入院以及术后30天内再次手术。我们还模拟了术后窗口期之后的后续良性附件手术。根据美国妇产科医师学会指南,那些手术从阴道途径转为其他途径的患者,无论治疗组如何,均假定接受双侧输卵管切除术。成本数据来自已发表的文献和医疗保险报销数据,必要时使用单个机构892例子宫切除术的内部成本数据来估算成本。并发症发生率根据已发表的文献以及2008年至2013年国家外科质量改进计划数据库中记录的13397例阴道子宫切除术确定。

结果

从单纯阴道子宫切除术政策转变为常规计划性输卵管切除术政策,可使每225例接受手术的女性中有1例避免被诊断为卵巢癌,每450例接受手术的女性中有1例避免死于卵巢癌。总体而言,输卵管切除术是一种比不进行输卵管切除术成本更低的策略(7350.62美元对8113.45美元)。敏感性分析表明,成本增加背后的驱动力是保留输卵管的女性后续良性附件手术风险增加。计划性机会性输卵管切除术的主要并发症比单纯子宫切除术更多(7.95%对7.68%)。主要并发症包括输血、转为开腹手术或腹腔镜手术、需要干预的脓肿/血肿、肠梗阻、再次入院以及术后30天内再次手术。因此,每预防1例癌症,常规输卵管切除术会额外导致0.61例并发症,每预防1例癌症死亡会额外导致1.21例并发症。因此,外科医生必须承受额外约3例并发症才能预防5例癌症诊断,承受额外约6例并发症才能预防五例癌症死亡。

结论

输卵管切除术应在阴道子宫切除术中常规进行,因为它是主要策略,因此具有成本效益。并发症仅略有增加,但与癌症预防的权衡非常有利。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验