• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

词汇判断与视觉半视野:对反应时间-准确性关系的考察。

Lexical decision and visual hemifield: an examination of the RT-accuracy relationship.

作者信息

Babkoff H, Faust M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 1988;26(5):711-25. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(88)90006-1.

DOI:10.1016/0028-3932(88)90006-1
PMID:3211289
Abstract

Visual hemifield, stimulus duration and angle of eccentricity were manipulated using a lexical decision paradigm (discrimination of words from non-words). Lexical decision was measured by several dependent variables: reaction time, (RT); accuracy, d'; and beta. The results support the generalization of RVF superiority in a lexical decision task for parafoveal stimulation for three dependent variables, RT, accuracy and d'. No significant effect of any stimulus manipulation was found for beta. When RT is plotted as a function of accuracy, the data separate into two groups (one for words, one for non-words) each best described by a linear equation with negative slope. The implication of this analysis is discussed, and the hypothesis offered that the same basic process discriminates words from non-words in a lexical decision task, regardless of visual field, parafoveal angle of eccentricity or stimulus duration. Visual field is processed no differently from the other stimulus manipulations.

摘要

使用词汇判断范式(区分单词和非单词)来操纵视觉半视野、刺激持续时间和偏心率角度。词汇判断通过几个因变量来衡量:反应时间(RT)、准确率(d')和β值。结果支持了右视野优势在词汇判断任务中对中央凹旁刺激的三个因变量(RT、准确率和d')的普遍适用性。对于β值,未发现任何刺激操纵有显著影响。当将RT绘制为准确率的函数时,数据分为两组(一组为单词,一组为非单词),每组都能用具有负斜率的线性方程进行最佳描述。讨论了该分析的含义,并提出假设:在词汇判断任务中,无论视野、中央凹旁偏心率角度或刺激持续时间如何,相同的基本过程都能区分单词和非单词。对视野的处理与其他刺激操纵没有差异。

相似文献

1
Lexical decision and visual hemifield: an examination of the RT-accuracy relationship.词汇判断与视觉半视野:对反应时间-准确性关系的考察。
Neuropsychologia. 1988;26(5):711-25. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(88)90006-1.
2
Lexical decision, parafoveal eccentricity and visual hemifield.词汇判断、副中央凹偏心率和视觉半视野。
Cortex. 1985 Dec;21(4):581-93. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(58)80006-4.
3
Lexical decision time as a function of visual field and stimulus probability.作为视野和刺激概率函数的词汇判断时间。
Cortex. 1983 Apr;19(1):13-30. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(83)80047-1.
4
Lexical decision, visual hemifield and angle of orientation.词汇判断、视觉半视野与定向角度
Neuropsychologia. 1997 Apr;35(4):487-95. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(96)00072-3.
5
Lateral eyes or lateralized? Hemiretinal and ocular dominance effects on visual field asymmetries for the lexical decision task.侧眼还是偏侧化?半视网膜和眼优势对词汇判断任务视野不对称性的影响。
Brain Cogn. 1988 Oct;8(2):227-39. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(88)90051-6.
6
Lexical decision and naming asymmetries: influence of response selection and response bias.词汇判断与命名不对称:反应选择和反应偏差的影响。
Brain Lang. 1988 Jul;34(2):302-14. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(88)90141-1.
7
Effect of response programming on hemispheric differences in lexical decision.反应编程对词汇判断中半球差异的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 1990;28(7):635-46. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(90)90118-8.
8
Hemispheric specialization for word classes with visual presentations and lexical decision task.具有视觉呈现和词汇判断任务的词类的半球特化。
Brain Cogn. 1992 Nov;20(2):399-408. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(92)90029-l.
9
A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task.词汇判断任务的扩散模型解释
Psychol Rev. 2004 Jan;111(1):159-82. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.159.
10
Hemispheric specialization or reading habits: evidence from lexical decision research with Hebrew words and sentences.半球特化还是阅读习惯:来自希伯来语单词和句子词汇判定研究的证据。
Brain Lang. 1993 Apr;44(3):254-63. doi: 10.1006/brln.1993.1017.

引用本文的文献

1
The language of arithmetic across the hemispheres: An event-related potential investigation.跨半球的算术语言:一项事件相关电位研究。
Brain Res. 2017 May 1;1662:46-56. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2017.02.019. Epub 2017 Feb 22.