• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

词汇判断与命名不对称:反应选择和反应偏差的影响。

Lexical decision and naming asymmetries: influence of response selection and response bias.

作者信息

Chiarello C, Nuding S, Pollock A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Syracuse University, NY 13244-2340.

出版信息

Brain Lang. 1988 Jul;34(2):302-14. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(88)90141-1.

DOI:10.1016/0093-934x(88)90141-1
PMID:3401696
Abstract

Signal detection measures were used to evaluate the effects of several response variables (manual vs. vocal, Go-NoGo vs. Yes-No) on lexical decision asymmetries. An unvarying right visual field advantage in discriminability (d') was observed in each condition. However, response criteria (beta) varied over visual fields and conditions. Naming and lexical decision were shown to have equivalent asymmetries when the effects of response bias are removed. The results indicate that postaccess decision processes make important contributions to lexical decision asymmetries.

摘要

信号检测措施被用于评估几个反应变量(手动与发声、Go-NoGo与是-否)对词汇判断不对称性的影响。在每种情况下都观察到在辨别力(d')方面始终存在右视野优势。然而,反应标准(β)在不同视野和情况下有所不同。当去除反应偏差的影响时,命名和词汇判断显示出等效的不对称性。结果表明,提取后决策过程对词汇判断不对称性有重要贡献。

相似文献

1
Lexical decision and naming asymmetries: influence of response selection and response bias.词汇判断与命名不对称:反应选择和反应偏差的影响。
Brain Lang. 1988 Jul;34(2):302-14. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(88)90141-1.
2
Effect of response programming on hemispheric differences in lexical decision.反应编程对词汇判断中半球差异的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 1990;28(7):635-46. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(90)90118-8.
3
Lateral eyes or lateralized? Hemiretinal and ocular dominance effects on visual field asymmetries for the lexical decision task.侧眼还是偏侧化?半视网膜和眼优势对词汇判断任务视野不对称性的影响。
Brain Cogn. 1988 Oct;8(2):227-39. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(88)90051-6.
4
Visual cerebral lateralization over phases of the menstrual cycle: a preliminary investigation.月经周期各阶段的视觉脑侧化:一项初步调查。
Brain Cogn. 1989 Sep;11(1):18-36. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(89)90002-x.
5
Lexical decision and visual hemifield: an examination of the RT-accuracy relationship.词汇判断与视觉半视野:对反应时间-准确性关系的考察。
Neuropsychologia. 1988;26(5):711-25. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(88)90006-1.
6
Instruction effects on gender differences in visual field advantages during lexical decision tasks.词汇判断任务中指导语对视野优势性别差异的影响。
Cortex. 1991 Sep;27(3):453-8. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80041-x.
7
Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics.词汇判断、命名和语义分类任务中的歧义与同义词效应:正字法、音系学和语义学之间的相互作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Jul;28(4):686-713.
8
Is the go/no-go lexical decision task an alternative to the yes/no lexical decision task?二选一词汇判断任务能否替代是/否词汇判断任务?
Mem Cognit. 2002 Jan;30(1):34-45. doi: 10.3758/bf03195263.
9
Hemispheric specialization for processing Chinese characters: some evidence from lexical decision vocal reaction times.处理汉字的半球特化:来自词汇判断语音反应时间的一些证据。
Percept Mot Skills. 1989 Dec;69(3 Pt 2):1083-9. doi: 10.1177/00315125890693-203.
10
Is the go/no-go lexical decision task preferable to the yes/no task with developing readers?发展性阅读者更倾向于使用“是/否”词汇判断任务,而不是“是/否”任务吗?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Sep;110(1):125-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.04.005. Epub 2011 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining interhemispheric processing and task demand in lexical decision-making: insights from lateralized visual field paradigm.研究词汇判断中的半球间加工和任务需求:来自半侧视野范式的见解
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 15;14:1208786. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1208786. eCollection 2023.
2
Response requirements affect offside judgments in football (soccer).回应要求会影响足球(soccer)中的越位判断。
Psychol Res. 2019 Jul;83(5):924-934. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0902-6. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
3
The onset and time course of semantic priming during rapid recognition of visual words.
视觉单词快速识别过程中语义启动的起始与时间进程。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 May;43(5):881-902. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000377. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
4
Grasping with the eyes: the role of elongation in visual recognition of manipulable objects.用眼睛抓取:伸长在可操纵物体视觉识别中的作用。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Mar;14(1):319-35. doi: 10.3758/s13415-013-0208-0.
5
A right visual field advantage for visual processing of manipulable objects.对可操作性物体的视觉处理存在右侧视野优势。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2012 Dec;12(4):813-25. doi: 10.3758/s13415-012-0106-x.
6
Evaluating effects of divided hemispheric processing on word recognition in foveal and extrafoveal displays: the evidence from Arabic.评估半侧大脑加工对中心凹和旁中心凹视野内单词识别的影响:来自阿拉伯语的证据。
PLoS One. 2011 Apr 29;6(4):e18131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018131.
7
Hemisphericsymmetries in the identification of band-pass filtered letters Reply to Christman et al. (1997).被通带滤波后的字母的识别中的半球对称性 答复 Christman 等人(1997)。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1997 Jun;4(2):285-7. doi: 10.3758/BF03209407.
8
Aphasia therapy on a neuroscience basis.基于神经科学的失语症治疗。
Aphasiology. 2008 Jun;22(6):563-599. doi: 10.1080/02687030701612213. Epub 2008 May 21.
9
A model of the go/no-go task.一种停止信号任务模型。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Aug;136(3):389-413. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.389.
10
The effect of semantic distance in yes/no and go/no-go semantic categorization tasks.是/否和执行/不执行语义分类任务中语义距离的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2003 Jan;31(1):100-13. doi: 10.3758/bf03196086.