Furl Nicholas, Begum Forida, Sulik Justin, Ferrarese Francesca Pizzorni, Jans Sarah, Woolley Caroline
Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham Hill, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, United Kingdom.
Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham Hill, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, United Kingdom.
Neuroimage. 2020 May 15;212:116676. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116676. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
The challenging computational problem of perceiving dynamic faces "in the wild" goes unresolved because most research focuses on easier questions about static photograph perception. This literature conceptualizes face representation as a dissimilarity-based "face space", with axes that describe the dimensions of static images. Some versions express positions in face space relative to a central tendency (norm). Are facial movements represented like this? We tested for representations that accord with an a priori hypothesized motion-based face space by experimentally manipulating faces' motion-based dissimilarity. Because we caricatured movements, we could test for representations of dissimilarity from a motion-based norm. Behaviorally, participants perceived these caricatured expressions as convincing and recognizable. Moreover, as expected, caricature enhanced perceived dissimilarity between facial expressions. Functional magnetic resonance imaging showed that occipitotemporal brain responses, including face-selective and motion-sensitive areas, reflect this face space. This evidence converged across methods including analysis of univariate mean responses (which additionally exhibited norm-based responses), repetition suppression and representational similarity analysis. This accumulated evidence for "representational geometry" shows how perception and visual brain responses to facial dynamics reflect representations of movement-based dissimilarity spaces, including explicit computation of distance from a norm movement.
感知“现实生活中”动态面孔这一具有挑战性的计算问题仍未得到解决,因为大多数研究都集中在关于静态照片感知的较简单问题上。该文献将面部表征概念化为基于差异的“面部空间”,其轴描述静态图像的维度。一些版本将面部空间中的位置表示为相对于中心趋势(规范)。面部运动也是这样表示的吗?我们通过实验操纵基于运动的面部差异,测试了与先验假设的基于运动的面部空间相符的表征。由于我们对运动进行了夸张处理,所以我们可以测试与基于运动的规范的差异表征。在行为上,参与者认为这些夸张的表情令人信服且易于识别。此外,正如预期的那样,夸张增强了面部表情之间的感知差异。功能磁共振成像显示,枕颞部大脑反应,包括面部选择性和运动敏感区域,反映了这个面部空间。这一证据在多种方法中得到了一致验证,包括单变量平均反应分析(其还表现出基于规范的反应)、重复抑制和表征相似性分析。这一关于“表征几何学”的累积证据表明,对面部动态的感知和视觉大脑反应是如何反映基于运动的差异空间的表征的,包括从规范运动中明确计算距离。