• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国福利改革对心理健康的影响,全民信贷:一项纵向对照研究。

Effects on mental health of a UK welfare reform, Universal Credit: a longitudinal controlled study.

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Department of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Lancet Public Health. 2020 Mar;5(3):e157-e164. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30026-8.

DOI:10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30026-8
PMID:32113519
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7208537/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Universal Credit, a welfare benefit reform in the UK, began to replace six existing benefit schemes in April, 2013, starting with the income-based Job Seekers Allowance. We aimed to determine the effects on mental health of the introduction of Universal Credit.

METHODS

In this longitudinal controlled study, we linked 197 111 observations from 52 187 individuals of working age (16-64 years) in England, Wales, and Scotland who participated in the Understanding Society UK Longitudinal Household Panel Study between 2009 and 2018 with administrative data on the month when Universal Credit was introduced into the area in which each respondent lived. We included participants who had data on employment status, local authority area of residence, psychological distress, and confounding variables. We excluded individuals from Northern Ireland and people out of work with a disability. We used difference-in-differences analysis of this nationally representative, longitudinal, household survey and separated respondents into two groups: unemployed people who were eligible for Universal Credit (intervention group) and people who were not unemployed and therefore would not have generally been eligible for Universal Credit (comparison group). Using the phased roll-out of Universal Credit, we compared the change in psychological distress (self-reported via General Health Questionnaire-12) between the intervention group and the comparison group over time as the reform was introduced in the area in which each respondent lived. We defined clinically significant psychological distress as a score of greater than 3 on the General Health Questionnaire-12. We tested whether there were differential effects across subgroups (age, sex, and education).

FINDINGS

The prevalence of psychological distress increased in the intervention group by 6·57 percentage points (95% CI 1·69-11·42) after the introduction of Universal Credit relative to the comparison group, after accounting for potential confounders. We estimate that between April 29, 2013, and Dec 31, 2018, an additional 63 674 (95% CI 10 042-117 307) unemployed people will have experienced levels of psychological distress that are clinically significant due to the introduction of Universal Credit; 21 760 of these individuals might reach the diagnostic threshold for depression.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings suggest that the introduction of Universal Credit led to an increase in psychological distress, a measure of mental health difficulties, among those affected by the policy. Future changes to government welfare systems should be evaluated not only on a fiscal basis but on their potential to affect health and wellbeing.

FUNDING

Wellcome Trust, UK National Institute for Health Research, and Medical Research Council.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08c2/7208537/40f56b8441c1/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08c2/7208537/1bb15550ae26/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08c2/7208537/40f56b8441c1/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08c2/7208537/1bb15550ae26/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08c2/7208537/40f56b8441c1/gr2.jpg
摘要

背景

英国的福利改革“通用信贷”于 2013 年 4 月开始取代六种现有福利计划,首先是基于收入的求职者津贴。我们旨在确定通用信贷的引入对心理健康的影响。

方法

在这项纵向对照研究中,我们将英格兰、威尔士和苏格兰 52187 名 16-64 岁工作年龄人群的 1971111 次观察结果与行政管理数据相联系,这些人参加了 2009 年至 2018 年期间的“英国社会动态调查”,了解每个受访者居住地区通用信贷的引入月份。我们纳入了就业状况、地方当局居住地区、心理困扰和混杂变量方面的数据的参与者。我们排除了北爱尔兰的个人和有残疾但失业的人。我们使用差异差异分析对这项全国代表性的纵向家庭调查进行分析,并将受访者分为两组:有资格获得通用信贷的失业者(干预组)和那些没有失业,因此通常没有资格获得通用信贷的人(对照组)。利用通用信贷的分阶段推出,我们比较了随着改革在受访者居住的地区推出,干预组和对照组在时间上心理困扰(通过一般健康问卷-12 自我报告)的变化。我们将一般健康问卷-12 的得分大于 3 定义为临床显著的心理困扰。我们检验了是否存在亚组(年龄、性别和教育程度)的差异效应。

发现

在考虑了潜在混杂因素后,与对照组相比,在引入通用信贷后,干预组的心理困扰增加了 6.57 个百分点(95%CI,1.69-11.42)。我们估计,2013 年 4 月 29 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间,由于引入通用信贷,将有额外的 63674 名(95%CI,10042-117307)失业者经历临床显著的心理困扰水平;其中 21760 人可能达到抑郁诊断标准。

解释

我们的研究结果表明,通用信贷的引入导致受政策影响的人的心理健康困难程度增加,这是衡量心理健康的一种指标。未来政府福利制度的改革不仅应在财政基础上进行评估,还应评估其对健康和福利的潜在影响。

资助

惠康信托基金会、英国国家卫生研究院和医学研究理事会。

相似文献

1
Effects on mental health of a UK welfare reform, Universal Credit: a longitudinal controlled study.英国福利改革对心理健康的影响,全民信贷:一项纵向对照研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Mar;5(3):e157-e164. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30026-8.
2
The effect of immigration policy reform on mental health in people from minoritised ethnic groups in England: an interrupted time series analysis of longitudinal data from the UK Household Longitudinal Study cohort.英格兰少数族裔人群移民政策改革对其心理健康的影响:基于英国住户纵向研究队列的纵向数据分析
Lancet Psychiatry. 2024 Mar;11(3):183-192. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(23)00412-1.
3
Universal Credit: Welfare reform and mental health.普遍信贷:福利改革与心理健康
J Health Econ. 2024 Dec;98:102940. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2024.102940. Epub 2024 Nov 10.
4
Effect of Universal Credit on young children's mental health: quasi-experimental evidence from Understanding Society.全民信贷对幼儿心理健康的影响:来自“理解社会”的准实验证据。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2024 Nov 11;78(12):764-771. doi: 10.1136/jech-2024-222293.
5
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of young people: A comparison between China and the United Kingdom.**新冠疫情对青少年心理健康的影响:中国与英国的比较**
Chin J Traumatol. 2021 Jul;24(4):231-236. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2021.05.005. Epub 2021 May 21.
6
Psychological distress, depression, anxiety, and life satisfaction following COVID-19 infection: evidence from 11 UK longitudinal population studies.新冠感染后出现的心理困扰、抑郁、焦虑和生活满意度:来自 11 项英国纵向人群研究的证据。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Nov;9(11):894-906. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00307-8.
7
The effect of a transition into poverty on child and maternal mental health: a longitudinal analysis of the UK Millennium Cohort Study.贫困对儿童和产妇心理健康的影响:对英国千禧年队列研究的纵向分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Mar;2(3):e141-e148. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30011-7. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
8
In-work tax credits for families and their impact on health status in adults.针对家庭的在职税收抵免及其对成年人健康状况的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 6;2013(8):CD009963. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009963.pub2.
9
A web-based, peer-supported self-management intervention to reduce distress in relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: the REACT RCT.一项基于网络的、由同行支持的自我管理干预措施,旨在减轻精神病或双相情感障碍患者亲属的痛苦:REACT RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(32):1-142. doi: 10.3310/hta24320.
10
The unequal impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on young adults' mental health. Predictors of vulnerability and resilience using longitudinal birth cohort data in the UK.新冠疫情对年轻人心理健康的不平等影响。利用英国纵向出生队列数据进行脆弱性和复原力预测因素研究。
J Adolesc. 2025 Jan;97(1):102-112. doi: 10.1002/jad.12400. Epub 2024 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding changes to life expectancy and inequalities in the UK, Germany, and other high-income countries.了解英国、德国及其他高收入国家预期寿命和不平等现象的变化。
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025 Sep 9. doi: 10.1007/s00103-025-04126-1.
2
'It Is Like a Cross-Stitch … All Joined Together But Not Making a Very Nice Pattern': A Qualitative Study of Patient Perspectives on Physical Health Inequalities in Severe Mental Illness.“这就像一幅十字绣……所有部分都连在一起,但却没有形成一个非常好看的图案”:一项关于患者对严重精神疾病中身体健康不平等看法的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70367. doi: 10.1111/hex.70367.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Universal Credit in North East England: a qualitative study of claimants and support staff.英格兰东北部普遍信贷的影响:对申请人和支持人员的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 4;9(7):e029611. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029611.
2
Effects of restrictions to Income Support on health of lone mothers in the UK: a natural experiment study.英国对收入支持的限制对单身母亲健康的影响:一项自然实验研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2018 Jul;3(7):e333-e340. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30109-9.
3
The structure of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): two meta-analytic factor analyses.
Preventing depression in high-income countries-A systematic review of studies evaluating change in social determinants.
高收入国家抑郁症的预防——对评估社会决定因素变化的研究的系统评价
PLoS One. 2025 May 21;20(5):e0323378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323378. eCollection 2025.
4
Exploring potential for occupational therapy practice models within areas of social deprivation: A qualitative inquiry within a community-centred food cooperative.探索社会贫困地区职业治疗实践模式的潜力:以社区为中心的食品合作社中的定性研究。
Br J Occup Ther. 2022 Oct;85(10):828-836. doi: 10.1177/03080226221092689. Epub 2022 May 15.
5
The impacts of Liverpool Citizen's Advice on Prescription (CAP) on mental health outcomes- an Instrumental Variable (IV) approach.利物浦公民咨询局对处方(CAP)对心理健康结果的影响——一种工具变量(IV)方法。
SSM Popul Health. 2025 Mar 22;30:101785. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101785. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Using natural experiments to evaluate population health and health system interventions: new framework for producers and users of evidence.利用自然实验评估人群健康与卫生系统干预措施:证据生产者和使用者的新框架
BMJ. 2025 Mar 28;388:e080505. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-080505.
7
Deep reinforcement learning can promote sustainable human behaviour in a common-pool resource problem.深度强化学习可以在公共资源问题中促进可持续的人类行为。
Nat Commun. 2025 Mar 22;16(1):2824. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-58043-7.
8
Examining the relationship between income and both mental and physical health among adults in the UK: Analysis of 12 waves (2009-2022) of Understanding Society.研究英国成年人收入与身心健康之间的关系:对“理解社会”项目12轮(2009 - 2022年)数据的分析
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 6;20(3):e0316792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316792. eCollection 2025.
9
A new era of inequality: profound changes to mortality in England, Scotland, and 10 major British cities.不平等的新时代:英格兰、苏格兰及英国10个主要城市死亡率的深刻变化。
Eur J Public Health. 2025 Apr 1;35(2):235-241. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaf008.
10
"They Don't Understand People With Learning Disabilities": Exploring the Experiences of People With Intellectual Disabilities Undergoing Welfare Assessments.“他们不理解有学习障碍的人”:探索智力障碍者接受福利评估的经历。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2025 Jan;38(1):e70000. doi: 10.1111/jar.70000.
一般健康问卷(GHQ-12)的结构:两项荟萃分析的因子分析。
Health Psychol Rev. 2018 Jun;12(2):179-194. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2018.1426484. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
4
Austerity and health: the impact in the UK and Europe.财政紧缩与健康:对英国及欧洲的影响
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Oct 1;27(suppl_4):18-21. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx167.
5
Austerity and old-age mortality in England: a longitudinal cross-local area analysis, 2007-2013.英国的财政紧缩与老年死亡率:2007 - 2013年纵向跨地区分析
J R Soc Med. 2016 Mar;109(3):109-16. doi: 10.1177/0141076816632215.
6
Fit-for-work or fit-for-unemployment? Does the reassessment of disability benefit claimants using a tougher work capability assessment help people into work?适合工作还是适合失业?使用更严格的工作能力评估对残疾福利申请人进行重新评估是否有助于人们就业?
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 May;70(5):452-8. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-206333. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
7
Trends in mental health inequalities in England during a period of recession, austerity and welfare reform 2004 to 2013.2004年至2013年经济衰退、财政紧缩和福利改革期间英格兰心理健康不平等状况的趋势
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Dec;147:324-31. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.11.009. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
8
'First, do no harm': are disability assessments associated with adverse trends in mental health? A longitudinal ecological study.“首先,勿伤患者”:残疾评估与心理健康的不良趋势有关吗?一项纵向生态学研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Apr;70(4):339-45. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-206209. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
9
The mental component of the short-form 12 health survey (SF-12) as a measure of depressive disorders in the general population: results with three alternative scoring methods.短式 12 健康调查(SF-12)的精神分量表作为一般人群中抑郁障碍的衡量指标:三种替代评分方法的结果。
Value Health. 2013 Jun;16(4):564-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.01.006. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
10
Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: new Medical Research Council guidance.利用自然实验评估人群健康干预措施:英国医学研究理事会新指南。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Dec;66(12):1182-6. doi: 10.1136/jech-2011-200375. Epub 2012 May 10.