Health Economics Group, Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter, Exeter, England, UK.
Health Economics Group, Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter, Exeter, England, UK; South West Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, England, UK.
Value Health. 2020 Feb;23(2):242-250. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.08.009. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
A major debate in the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) literature concerns whose preferences should be used to estimate health state values (HSVs) and to calculate QALYs.
This study explores differences between public and patient values for multiple sclerosis (MS) health states, described using an MS-specific classification system (Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-8 Dimensions [MSIS-8D]).
The MSIS-8D is an existing preference-based measure of health-related quality of life in MS, which has 2 tariffs of HSVs, based on the preferences of a representative sample of the UK general population (n = 1702) and of people with MS living in the United Kingdom (n = 1635), elicited using the time trade-off technique. Here, we explore differences between HSVs by sample type, using descriptive statistics and multivariate regression methods.
Overall, the survey of people with MS produced significantly higher HSVs; estimated values ranged from 0.079 to 0.883 for the general population survey and from 0.138 to 0.894 for the MS survey. Differences in HSVs were more pronounced for severe health states. The difference between patient and public values varied across the dimensions of the MSIS-8D. People with MS placed greater importance on cognition than the general population, leading to lower HSVs when impairment was at a worse level; the reverse was true for the daily activities, fatigue, and depression dimensions.
We identified significant differences in HSVs by sample type. Using patient rather than public values may influence the results of economic evaluations, depending on the dimensions of health-related quality of life affected by the intervention being assessed, and may therefore have important consequences for reimbursement decisions.
在质量调整生命年(QALY)文献中,一个主要的争论是应该使用谁的偏好来估计健康状态值(HSV)和计算 QALY。
本研究探讨了使用特定于多发性硬化症(MS)的分类系统(多发性硬化症影响量表-8 维度 [MSIS-8D])描述的多个 MS 健康状态下,公众和患者价值观之间的差异。
MSIS-8D 是一种现有的 MS 健康相关生活质量的偏好衡量标准,它有两种 HSV 资费,一种基于英国普通人群(n=1702)的代表性样本的偏好,另一种基于居住在英国的 MS 患者(n=1635)的偏好,使用时间权衡技术得出。在这里,我们使用描述性统计和多变量回归方法,根据样本类型探讨 HSV 之间的差异。
总体而言,MS 患者的调查产生了明显更高的 HSV;基于普通人群调查的估计值范围为 0.079 至 0.883,基于 MS 调查的估计值范围为 0.138 至 0.894。在严重的健康状态下,HSV 的差异更为明显。患者和公众价值观之间的差异在 MSIS-8D 的各个维度上有所不同。MS 患者比普通人群更重视认知,因此在认知受损程度更严重时,HSV 较低;而在日常生活活动、疲劳和抑郁维度上则相反。
我们根据样本类型确定了 HSV 之间的显著差异。使用患者而不是公众的价值观可能会影响经济评估的结果,这取决于评估的干预措施所影响的健康相关生活质量维度,因此可能对报销决策产生重要影响。