• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于相关性和质量的排名算法在循证医学中的应用。

A relevance and quality-based ranking algorithm applied to evidence-based medicine.

机构信息

Department of Technologies and Information Systems, Escuela Sup. Informática, Paseo de la Universidad 4, 13071, Ciudad Real, Spain.

Department of Technologies and Information Systems, Escuela Sup. Informática, Paseo de la Universidad 4, 13071, Ciudad Real, Spain.

出版信息

Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Jul;191:105415. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105415. Epub 2020 Feb 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105415
PMID:32114416
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7114639/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The amount of information available about millions of different subjects is growing every day. This has led to the birth of new search tools specialized in different domains, because classical information retrieval models have trouble dealing with the special characteristics of some of these domains. Evidence-based Medicine is a case of a complex domain where classical information retrieval models can help search engines retrieve documents by considering the presence or absence of terms, but these must be complemented with other specific strategies which allow retrieving and ranking documents including the best current evidence and methodological quality.

OBJECTIVE

The goal is to present a ranking algorithm able to select the best documents for clinicians considering aspects related to the relevance and the quality of said documents.

METHODS

In order to assess the effectiveness of this proposal, an experimental methodology has been followed by using Medline as a data set and the Cochrane Library as a gold standard.

RESULTS

Applying the evaluation methodology proposed, and after submitting 40 queries on the platform developed, the MAP (Mean Average Precision) obtained was 20.26%.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful results have been achieved with the experiments, improving on other studies, but under different and even more complex circumstances.

摘要

背景

每天都有大量关于数百万个不同主题的信息可供获取。这导致了专门针对不同领域的新型搜索工具的诞生,因为经典的信息检索模型难以处理这些领域的一些特殊特征。循证医学就是一个复杂领域的案例,经典的信息检索模型可以通过考虑术语的存在与否来帮助搜索引擎检索文档,但这些模型必须辅以其他特定策略,这些策略允许检索和对包括最新最佳证据和方法学质量在内的文档进行排名。

目的

旨在提出一种能够为临床医生选择最佳文档的排名算法,该算法考虑到了文档的相关性和质量等方面。

方法

为了评估该建议的有效性,我们采用了实验方法,使用 Medline 作为数据集,Cochrane 图书馆作为黄金标准。

结果

通过应用所提出的评估方法,并在开发的平台上提交了 40 个查询,获得的 MAP(平均平均精度)为 20.26%。

结论

实验取得了成功的结果,与其他研究相比有所改进,但在不同且更加复杂的情况下仍有提升空间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f15/7114639/134e5bc2a29b/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f15/7114639/134e5bc2a29b/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f15/7114639/134e5bc2a29b/gr1_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
A relevance and quality-based ranking algorithm applied to evidence-based medicine.一种基于相关性和质量的排名算法在循证医学中的应用。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Jul;191:105415. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105415. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
2
Improving data retrieval quality: Evidence based medicine perspective.提高数据检索质量:循证医学视角
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S106-7. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150710.
3
Retrieval with gene queries.使用基因查询进行检索。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Apr 21;7:220. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-220.
4
Evaluating relevance ranking strategies for MEDLINE retrieval.评估用于MEDLINE检索的相关性排序策略。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jan-Feb;16(1):32-6. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2935. Epub 2008 Oct 24.
5
On the query reformulation technique for effective MEDLINE document retrieval.针对有效 MEDLINE 文档检索的查询改写技术。
J Biomed Inform. 2010 Oct;43(5):686-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2010.04.005. Epub 2010 Apr 13.
6
Evaluation of Term Ranking Algorithms for Pseudo-Relevance Feedback in MEDLINE Retrieval.医学文献数据库检索中用于伪相关反馈的术语排序算法评估
Healthc Inform Res. 2011 Jun;17(2):120-30. doi: 10.4258/hir.2011.17.2.120. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
7
G-Bean: an ontology-graph based web tool for biomedical literature retrieval.G-Bean:基于本体图的生物医学文献检索网络工具。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2014;15 Suppl 12(Suppl 12):S1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-S12-S1. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
8
Where to search top-K biomedical ontologies?在哪里搜索顶级生物医学本体?
Brief Bioinform. 2019 Jul 19;20(4):1477-1491. doi: 10.1093/bib/bby015.
9
Using hit curves to compare search algorithm performance.使用命中曲线比较搜索算法性能。
J Biomed Inform. 2007 Apr;40(2):93-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2005.12.007. Epub 2006 Jan 24.
10
A LDA-based approach to promoting ranking diversity for genomics information retrieval.基于 LDA 的方法提高基因组信息检索的排名多样性。
BMC Genomics. 2012 Jun 11;13 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-S3-S2.

本文引用的文献

1
How Do Healthcare Professionals Personalize Their Software? A Pilot Exploration Based on an Electronic Health Records Search Engine.医疗保健专业人员如何个性化他们的软件?基于电子健康记录搜索引擎的初步探索。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 21;264:1408-1412. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190459.
2
ARtPM: Article Retrieval for Precision Medicine.精准医学文献检索工具(ARtPM)
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103224. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103224. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
3
Best Match: New relevance search for PubMed.最佳匹配:PubMed 的新相关性搜索。
PLoS Biol. 2018 Aug 28;16(8):e2005343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005343. eCollection 2018 Aug.
4
A shared latent space matrix factorisation method for recommending new trial evidence for systematic review updates.一种用于为系统评价更新推荐新试验证据的共享潜在空间矩阵分解方法。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Mar;79:32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
5
Development and empirical user-centered evaluation of semantically-based query recommendation for an electronic health record search engine.电子健康记录搜索引擎基于语义的查询推荐的开发与以用户为中心的实证评估
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Mar;67:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.01.013. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
6
Supporting information retrieval from electronic health records: A report of University of Michigan's nine-year experience in developing and using the Electronic Medical Record Search Engine (EMERSE).支持从电子健康记录中检索信息:密歇根大学开发和使用电子病历搜索引擎(EMERSE)九年经验报告。
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Jun;55:290-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 May 13.
7
Automatic information timeliness assessment of diabetes web sites by evidence based medicine.基于循证医学的糖尿病网站信息时效性自动评估
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014 Nov;117(2):104-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2014.07.014. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
8
Impact of PubMed search filters on the retrieval of evidence by physicians.PubMed 检索过滤器对医生获取证据的影响。
CMAJ. 2012 Feb 21;184(3):E184-90. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101661. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
9
Retrieval of diagnostic and treatment studies for clinical use through PubMed and PubMed's Clinical Queries filters.通过 PubMed 和 PubMed 的临床查询过滤器检索用于临床的诊断和治疗研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):652-9. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000233. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
10
Impact of clinical information-retrieval technology on physicians: a literature review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies.临床信息检索技术对医生的影响:定量、定性及混合方法研究的文献综述
Int J Med Inform. 2005 Sep;74(9):745-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.05.004.