• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何在欧洲医学文献中定义和理解防御性医疗:系统评价议定书。

How defensive medicine is defined and understood in European medical literature: protocol for a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Research Unit of General Practice, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

Department of Public Health, Research Unit of General Practice, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 28;10(2):e034300. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034300.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034300
PMID:32114473
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7050374/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The term defensive medicine, referring to actions motivated primarily by litigious concerns, originates from the USA and has been used in medical research literature since the late 1960s. Differences in medical legal systems between the US and most European countries with no tort legislation raise the question whether the US definition of defensive medicine holds true in Europe.

AIM

To present the protocol of a systematic review investigating variations in definitions and understandings of the term 'defensive medicine' in European research articles.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In concordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic review of all medical research literature that investigate defensive medicine will be performed by two independent reviewers. The databases PubMed, Embase and Cochrane will be systematically searched on the basis of predetermined criteria. Data from all included European studies will systematically be extracted including the studies' definitions and understandings of defensive medicine, especially the motives for doing medical actions that the study regards as 'defensive'.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No ethics clearance is required as no primary data will be collected. The results of the systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed, international journal.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

This review has been submitted to International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) and is awaiting registration.

摘要

简介

“防御性医疗”一词指的是主要出于诉讼担忧而采取的行动,起源于美国,并自 20 世纪 60 年代末以来一直在医学研究文献中使用。美国和大多数没有侵权立法的欧洲国家的医疗法律制度存在差异,这引发了一个问题,即美国对防御性医疗的定义是否适用于欧洲。

目的

介绍一项系统评价研究的方案,该研究旨在调查欧洲研究文章中“防御性医疗”一词的定义和理解差异。

方法和分析

根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目的规定,将由两名独立审查员对所有调查防御性医疗的医学研究文献进行系统评价。将根据预定标准对 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库进行系统搜索。将系统地从所有纳入的欧洲研究中提取数据,包括研究对防御性医疗的定义和理解,特别是对被研究视为“防御性”的医疗行为的动机。

伦理和传播

由于不会收集原始数据,因此不需要伦理批准。系统评价的结果将发表在同行评议的国际期刊上。

前瞻性注册编号

该综述已提交给国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO),正在等待注册。

相似文献

1
How defensive medicine is defined and understood in European medical literature: protocol for a systematic review.如何在欧洲医学文献中定义和理解防御性医疗:系统评价议定书。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 28;10(2):e034300. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034300.
2
How defensive medicine is defined in European medical literature: a systematic review.欧洲医学文献中对防御性医疗的定义:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 20;12(1):e057169. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057169.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Identifying indicators sensitive to primary healthcare nurse practitioner practice: a review of systematic reviews protocol.识别对初级保健执业护士实践敏感的指标:系统评价方案综述
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 6;11(1):e043213. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043213.
7
Clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus statements on rehabilitation for patients with COVID-19: protocol for a systematic review.临床实践指南和专家共识声明关于 COVID-19 患者康复:系统评价的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 4;12(8):e060767. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060767.
8
Sudden death in individuals with obstructive sleep apnoea: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的猝死:系统评价与荟萃分析方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 26;10(8):e039774. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039774.
9
Relationship between hormonal contraceptives and sleep among women of reproductive age: a systematic review protocol.激素避孕药与育龄期女性睡眠的关系:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 8;11(10):e045819. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045819.
10
Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol.评价 PROSPERO 记录特征对非 Cochrane 系统评价最终发表的预测作用:一项meta 流行病学研究方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 9;7(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0709-6.

引用本文的文献

1
When safety becomes the priority: defensive nursing practice and its associated factors among nurses in Egypt: a cross-sectional study.当安全成为首要任务时:埃及护士的防御性护理实践及其相关因素:一项横断面研究。
PeerJ. 2025 Feb 25;13:e19005. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19005. eCollection 2025.
2
How prepared are newly qualified allied health professionals for practice in the UK? A systematic review.新获得资质的辅助医疗专业人员在英国的实践中准备得如何?一项系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 15;14(5):e081518. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081518.
3
The practice of defensive medicine among physicians in the United Arab Emirates: A clinician survey.阿联酋医生中防御性医疗的实践:临床医生调查。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Aug 25;102(34):e34701. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034701.
4
On-call abdominal ultrasonography: the rate of negative examinations and incidentalomas in a European tertiary care center.急诊腹部超声检查:欧洲一家三级医疗中心的阴性检查率和偶发瘤发生率
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Jul;47(7):2520-2526. doi: 10.1007/s00261-022-03525-1. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
5
A qualitative interview study of Australian physicians on defensive practice and low value care: "it's easier to talk about our fear of lawyers than to talk about our fear of looking bad in front of each other".澳大利亚医生关于防御性医疗实践和低价值医疗的定性访谈研究:“与谈论我们害怕在彼此面前出丑相比,谈论我们对律师的恐惧更容易”。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Mar 4;23(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00755-2.
6
Patient safety assurance in the age of defensive medicine: a review.防御性医疗时代的患者安全保障:综述
Patient Saf Surg. 2022 Feb 17;16(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13037-022-00319-8.
7
Is the perceived impact of disciplinary procedures on medical doctors' professional practice associated with working in an open culture and feeling supported? A questionnaire among medical doctors in the Netherlands who have been disciplined.医生感知到的纪律处分程序对其专业实践的影响是否与在开放文化中工作和感到支持有关?对荷兰受过纪律处分的医生进行的问卷调查。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 26;10(11):e036922. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036922.

本文引用的文献

1
A colonized general practice? A critical habermasian analysis of how general practitioners experience defensive medicine in their everyday working life.殖民化的全科医学?对全科医生在日常工作中体验防御性医疗的哈贝马斯式批判性分析。
Health (London). 2021 Mar;25(2):141-158. doi: 10.1177/1363459319857461. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
2
How is defensive medicine understood and experienced in a primary care setting? A qualitative focus group study among Danish general practitioners.在基层医疗环境中,防御性医疗是如何被理解和体验的?一项针对丹麦全科医生的定性焦点小组研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 21;7(12):e019851. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019851.
3
Defensive medicine among neurosurgeons in the Netherlands: a national survey.荷兰神经外科医生的防御性医疗行为:一项全国性调查。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017 Dec;159(12):2341-2350. doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3323-9. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
4
Prevalence and costs of defensive medicine: a national survey of Italian physicians.防御性医疗的患病率及成本:意大利医生的全国性调查
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2017 Oct;22(4):211-217. doi: 10.1177/1355819617707224. Epub 2017 May 23.
5
The determinants of defensive medicine practices in Belgium.比利时防御性医疗行为的决定因素。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2017 Jul;12(3):363-386. doi: 10.1017/S174413311600030X. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
6
The Ecology of Defensive Medicine and Malpractice Litigation.防御性医疗与医疗事故诉讼的生态
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 16;11(3):e0150523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150523. eCollection 2016.
7
Physician spending and subsequent risk of malpractice claims: observational study.医生支出与医疗事故索赔的后续风险:观察性研究。
BMJ. 2015 Nov 4;351:h5516. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5516.
8
The impact of complaints procedures on the welfare, health and clinical practise of 7926 doctors in the UK: a cross-sectional survey.投诉程序对英国7926名医生的福利、健康和临床实践的影响:一项横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 15;5(1):e006687. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006687.
9
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.系统评价和荟萃分析议定书的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015:详细说明和解释。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 2;350:g7647. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647.
10
The first survey on defensive medicine in radiation oncology.第一篇关于放射肿瘤学中防御性医疗的调查。
Radiol Med. 2015 May;120(5):421-9. doi: 10.1007/s11547-014-0465-1. Epub 2014 Oct 30.