Sluijter Tim E, Yakar Derya, Kwee Thomas C
Medical Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Jul;47(7):2520-2526. doi: 10.1007/s00261-022-03525-1. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
To determine the proportions of abdominal US examinations during on-call hours that are negative and that contain an incidentaloma, and to explore temporal changes and determinants.
This study included 1615 US examinations that were done during on-call hours at a tertiary care center between 2005 and 2017.
The total proportion of negative US examinations was 49.2% (795/1615). The total proportion of US examinations with an incidentaloma was 8.0% (130/1615). There were no significant temporal changes in either one of these proportions. The likelihood of a negative US examination was significantly higher when requested by anesthesiology [odds ratio (OR) 2.609, P = 0.011], or when the indication for US was focused on gallbladder and biliary ducts (OR 1.556, P = 0.007), transplant (OR 2.371, P = 0.005), trauma (OR 3.274, P < 0.001), or urolithiasis/postrenal obstruction (OR 3.366, P < 0.001). In contrast, US examinations were significantly less likely to be negative when requested by urology (OR 0.423, P = 0.014), or when the indication for US was acute oncology (OR 0.207, P = 0.045) or appendicitis (OR 0.260, P < 0.001). The likelihood of an incidentaloma on US was significantly higher in older patients (OR 1.020 per year of age increase, P < 0.001) or when the liver was evaluated with US (OR 3.522, P < 0.001).
Nearly 50% of abdominal US examinations during on-call hours are negative, and 8% reveal an incidentaloma. Requesting specialty and indication for US affect the likelihood of a negative examination, and higher patient age and liver evaluations increase the chance of detecting an incidentaloma in this setting. These data may potentially be used to improve clinical reasoning and restrain overutilization of imaging.
确定值班期间腹部超声检查结果为阴性及发现偶发瘤的比例,并探讨其随时间的变化及影响因素。
本研究纳入了2005年至2017年期间在一家三级医疗中心值班时进行的1615例超声检查。
超声检查结果为阴性的总比例为49.2%(795/1615)。发现偶发瘤的超声检查总比例为8.0%(130/1615)。这两个比例均无显著的时间变化。当由麻醉科提出检查申请时,超声检查结果为阴性的可能性显著更高[比值比(OR)2.609,P = 0.011],或者当超声检查指征集中于胆囊和胆管时(OR 1.556,P = 0.007)、移植时(OR 2.371,P = 0.005)、创伤时(OR 3.274,P < 0.001)或尿路结石/肾后梗阻时(OR 3.366,P < 0.001)。相比之下,当由泌尿外科提出检查申请时,超声检查结果为阴性的可能性显著降低(OR 0.423,P = 0.014),或者当超声检查指征为急性肿瘤学问题时(OR 0.207,P = 0.045)或阑尾炎时(OR 0.260,P < 0.001)。年龄较大的患者超声检查发现偶发瘤的可能性显著更高(每年年龄增加OR 1.020,P < 0.001),或者当对肝脏进行超声检查时(OR 3.522,P < 0.001)。
值班期间近50%的腹部超声检查结果为阴性,8%发现偶发瘤。超声检查的申请科室和指征会影响检查结果为阴性的可能性,在这种情况下,患者年龄较大以及对肝脏进行检查会增加发现偶发瘤的机会。这些数据可能有助于改善临床推理并抑制影像学检查的过度使用。