Tretto Pedro Henrique Wentz, Dos Santos Mateus Bertolini Fernandes, Spazzin Aloisio Oro, Pereira Gabriel Kalil Rocha, Bacchi Atais
Graduate Program in Dentistry, Meridional Faculty-IMED, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.
Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas-UFPel, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2020 Jun;23(8):372-383. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1731481. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
The aim of this study was to assess the stress/strain in dental implant/abutments with alternative materials, in implants with different microgeometry, through finite element analysis (FEA). Three-dimensional models were created to simulate the clinical situation of replacement of a maxillary central incisor with implants, in a type III bone, with a provisional single crown, loaded with 100 N in a perpendicular direction. The FEA parameters studied were: implant materials-titanium, porous titanium, titanium-zirconia, zirconia, reinforced fiberglass composite (RFC), and polyetheretherketone (PEEK); and abutment materials-titanium, zirconia, RFC, and PEEK; implant macrogeometry-tapered of trapezoidal threads (TTT) and cylindrical of triangular threads (CTT) (ø4.3 mm × 11 mm). Microstrain, von Mises, shear, and maximum and minimum principal stresses in the structures and in peri-implant bone were compared. There was increased stress and strain in peri-implant bone tissue caused by implants of materials with lower elastic modulus (mainly for PEEK and RFC). They also presented higher concentration of stresses in the implant itself (especially RFC). Zirconia implants led to lower stress and strains in peri-implant bone tissue. Less rigid abutments (RFC and PEEK) associated with titanium implants led to higher stress in the implant and in peri-implant bone tissue. The TTT macrogeometry showed a higher stress concentration in the implant and peri-implant bone tissue. The stress/strain in peri-implant bone tissue and implant structures were affected by the material used, where reduced values were caused by stiffer materials. Lower stress/strain values were obtained with cylindrical implants of triangular treads.
本研究的目的是通过有限元分析(FEA)评估采用替代材料的牙种植体/基台以及具有不同微观几何形状的种植体中的应力/应变情况。创建三维模型以模拟在上颌中切牙缺失的临床情况下,使用临时单冠修复,在III类骨中植入种植体,并在垂直方向施加100 N载荷的情况。所研究的FEA参数包括:种植体材料——钛、多孔钛、钛 - 氧化锆、氧化锆、增强玻璃纤维复合材料(RFC)和聚醚醚酮(PEEK);以及基台材料——钛、氧化锆、RFC和PEEK;种植体宏观几何形状——梯形螺纹锥形(TTT)和三角形螺纹圆柱形(CTT)(ø4.3 mm×11 mm)。比较了结构和种植体周围骨中的微应变、冯·米塞斯应力、剪应力以及最大和最小主应力。弹性模量较低的材料制成的种植体(主要是PEEK和RFC)会导致种植体周围骨组织中的应力和应变增加。它们在种植体本身也表现出更高的应力集中(尤其是RFC)。氧化锆种植体导致种植体周围骨组织中的应力和应变较低。与钛种植体相关的刚性较小的基台(RFC和PEEK)会导致种植体和种植体周围骨组织中的应力更高。TTT宏观几何形状在种植体和种植体周围骨组织中表现出更高的应力集中。种植体周围骨组织和种植体结构中的应力/应变受所用材料的影响,较硬的材料会导致其值降低。三角形螺纹圆柱形种植体获得的应力/应变值较低。