• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与传统钛合金相比,替代材料的牙种植体和基台应力/应变评估——三维非线性有限元分析

Assessment of stress/strain in dental implants and abutments of alternative materials compared to conventional titanium alloy-3D non-linear finite element analysis.

作者信息

Tretto Pedro Henrique Wentz, Dos Santos Mateus Bertolini Fernandes, Spazzin Aloisio Oro, Pereira Gabriel Kalil Rocha, Bacchi Atais

机构信息

Graduate Program in Dentistry, Meridional Faculty-IMED, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.

Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas-UFPel, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.

出版信息

Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2020 Jun;23(8):372-383. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1731481. Epub 2020 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1080/10255842.2020.1731481
PMID:32116034
Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the stress/strain in dental implant/abutments with alternative materials, in implants with different microgeometry, through finite element analysis (FEA). Three-dimensional models were created to simulate the clinical situation of replacement of a maxillary central incisor with implants, in a type III bone, with a provisional single crown, loaded with 100 N in a perpendicular direction. The FEA parameters studied were: implant materials-titanium, porous titanium, titanium-zirconia, zirconia, reinforced fiberglass composite (RFC), and polyetheretherketone (PEEK); and abutment materials-titanium, zirconia, RFC, and PEEK; implant macrogeometry-tapered of trapezoidal threads (TTT) and cylindrical of triangular threads (CTT) (ø4.3 mm × 11 mm). Microstrain, von Mises, shear, and maximum and minimum principal stresses in the structures and in peri-implant bone were compared. There was increased stress and strain in peri-implant bone tissue caused by implants of materials with lower elastic modulus (mainly for PEEK and RFC). They also presented higher concentration of stresses in the implant itself (especially RFC). Zirconia implants led to lower stress and strains in peri-implant bone tissue. Less rigid abutments (RFC and PEEK) associated with titanium implants led to higher stress in the implant and in peri-implant bone tissue. The TTT macrogeometry showed a higher stress concentration in the implant and peri-implant bone tissue. The stress/strain in peri-implant bone tissue and implant structures were affected by the material used, where reduced values were caused by stiffer materials. Lower stress/strain values were obtained with cylindrical implants of triangular treads.

摘要

本研究的目的是通过有限元分析(FEA)评估采用替代材料的牙种植体/基台以及具有不同微观几何形状的种植体中的应力/应变情况。创建三维模型以模拟在上颌中切牙缺失的临床情况下,使用临时单冠修复,在III类骨中植入种植体,并在垂直方向施加100 N载荷的情况。所研究的FEA参数包括:种植体材料——钛、多孔钛、钛 - 氧化锆、氧化锆、增强玻璃纤维复合材料(RFC)和聚醚醚酮(PEEK);以及基台材料——钛、氧化锆、RFC和PEEK;种植体宏观几何形状——梯形螺纹锥形(TTT)和三角形螺纹圆柱形(CTT)(ø4.3 mm×11 mm)。比较了结构和种植体周围骨中的微应变、冯·米塞斯应力、剪应力以及最大和最小主应力。弹性模量较低的材料制成的种植体(主要是PEEK和RFC)会导致种植体周围骨组织中的应力和应变增加。它们在种植体本身也表现出更高的应力集中(尤其是RFC)。氧化锆种植体导致种植体周围骨组织中的应力和应变较低。与钛种植体相关的刚性较小的基台(RFC和PEEK)会导致种植体和种植体周围骨组织中的应力更高。TTT宏观几何形状在种植体和种植体周围骨组织中表现出更高的应力集中。种植体周围骨组织和种植体结构中的应力/应变受所用材料的影响,较硬的材料会导致其值降低。三角形螺纹圆柱形种植体获得的应力/应变值较低。

相似文献

1
Assessment of stress/strain in dental implants and abutments of alternative materials compared to conventional titanium alloy-3D non-linear finite element analysis.与传统钛合金相比,替代材料的牙种植体和基台应力/应变评估——三维非线性有限元分析
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2020 Jun;23(8):372-383. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1731481. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
2
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of titanium and yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide abutments and implants.钛和钇稳定氧化锆基台和种植体的三维有限元分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Sep-Oct;26(5):961-9.
3
The effect of different abutment and restorative crown materials on stress distribution in single-unit implant-supported restorations: A 3D finite element stress analysis.不同基台和修复体材料对单单位种植体支持修复体中应力分布的影响:三维有限元应力分析。
J Prosthodont. 2024 Jun;33(5):497-505. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13732. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
4
Static and dynamic stress analysis of different crown materials on a titanium base abutment in an implant-supported single crown: a 3D finite element analysis.不同冠材料对钛基种植体支持单冠的静态和动态应力分析:三维有限元分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 May 10;24(1):545. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04328-0.
5
Effect of different restorative crown and customized abutment materials on stress distribution in single implants and peripheral bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study.不同修复冠和定制基台材料对单颗种植体及其周围骨体中应力分布的影响:一项三维有限元分析研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Mar;119(3):437-445. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
6
Titanium versus zirconia implants supporting maxillary overdentures: three-dimensional finite element analysis.钛种植体与氧化锆种植体支持上颌覆盖义齿的三维有限元分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Sep-Oct;28(5):e198-208. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3019.
7
Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implants.单型和两件式氧化锆牙种植体上3单位固定局部义齿的生物力学评估
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2022 Feb;25(3):239-246. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2021.1946798. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
8
Comparison of strain generated in bone by "platform-switched" and "non-platform-switched" implants with straight and angulated abutments under vertical and angulated load: a finite element analysis study.垂直及成角载荷下,“平台转换”和“非平台转换”种植体搭配直基台与成角基台时骨内产生应变的比较:一项有限元分析研究
Indian J Dent Res. 2013 Jan-Feb;24(1):8-13. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.114913.
9
Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.上颌前部区域不同连接方式、长度和直径种植体生物力学行为的三维有限元分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jan-Feb;31(1):101-10. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4120. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
10
Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.平台连接和基台材料对单颗前牙种植支持修复体应力分布的影响:非线性三维有限元分析
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Nov;112(5):1096-102. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.03.015. Epub 2014 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
A Finite Element Analysis of a New Dental Implant Design: The Influence of the Diameter, Length, and Material of an Implant on Its Biomechanical Behavior.一种新型牙种植体设计的有限元分析:种植体直径、长度和材料对其生物力学行为的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jun 7;18(12):2692. doi: 10.3390/ma18122692.
2
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the biomechanical behaviour of different dental implants under immediate loading during three masticatory cycles.不同牙种植体在三个咀嚼周期即刻加载下生物力学行为的三维有限元分析
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 6;10(11):e32616. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32616. eCollection 2024 Jun 15.
3
Dental implant and abutment in PEEK: stress assessment in single crown retainers on anterior region.
PEEK 中的牙种植体和基台:前牙区单冠固位体的应力评估。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 May 25;28(6):336. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05722-2.
4
Comparison of biomechanical performance of titanium and polyaryletheretherketone miniscrews at different insertion angles: A finite element analysis.不同植入角度下钛合金与聚芳醚醚酮微型螺钉生物力学性能的比较:有限元分析
J Orthod Sci. 2024 May 8;13:13. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_102_23. eCollection 2024.
5
Biomaterials and Clinical Application of Dental Implants in Relation to Bone Density-A Narrative Review.与骨密度相关的牙种植体生物材料及临床应用——一篇叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 3;12(21):6924. doi: 10.3390/jcm12216924.
6
Properties of polyetheretheretherketone (PEEK) implant abutments: A systematic review.聚醚醚酮(PEEK)种植体基台的特性:一项系统评价。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2022 Apr 1;14(4):e349-e358. doi: 10.4317/jced.59466. eCollection 2022 Apr.
7
Mechanical Response of PEKK and PEEK As Frameworks for Implant-Supported Full-Arch Fixed Dental Prosthesis: 3D Finite Element Analysis.聚醚酮酮(PEKK)和聚醚醚酮(PEEK)作为种植体支持全牙弓固定义齿框架的力学响应:三维有限元分析
Eur J Dent. 2022 Feb;16(1):115-121. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731833. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
8
Stress distribution on different bar materials in implant-retained palatal obturator.种植体固位腭托不同杆材料上的应力分布
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 30;15(10):e0241589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241589. eCollection 2020.