Glia Institute, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Department of Neuroscience and Behavioral Sciences, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2022 Jan-Mar;11(1):1-17. doi: 10.1080/21622965.2020.1726353. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
Executive functions (EF) are a set of high order mental abilities that regulate cognition, emotions, and behavior. This study aims to report the construction and validation of a rating scale instrument for EF in children and adolescents aged from 5 to 18 years (EFICA), as well as to report the results of a comparison between children with ADHD and their peers without it. Thus, we conducted a population-based cross-sectional study relying on a sample composed of 3,284 typical children and adolescents accessed to study the psychometric properties of the parents' inventory (EFICA-P) and the teacher's inventory (EFICA-T) within a Structural Equation Modeling framework (SEM). Exploratory and confirmatory analyses were fitted, as well as the Cronbach's alpha and the McDonald's omega reliability indices. The known-groups method was carried out by independent Welch -tests between untreated ADHD children and their peers. We concluded that the parents' inventory is composed of three dimensions (Cool Index 1, Cool Index 2, and Hot Index): (1,649) = 4,607.852 < .01, CFI = .965, TLI .963, RMSEA = .053, whereas the teachers´ inventory is composed of two dimensions (Cool Index and Hot Index): (1,273) = 5,158.240, < .01, CFI = .991, TLI = .991, RMSEA = .077. The internal consistency of both inventories was >.9. Significant differences between the ADHD groups were found in all domains accessed. These findings indicate that both inventories have a high degree of validity regarding their internal structures, as well as supporting their clinical utility.
执行功能(EF)是一组高级心理能力,可调节认知、情绪和行为。本研究旨在报告一种用于 5 至 18 岁儿童和青少年的 EF 评定量表工具(EFICA)的构建和验证,以及报告 ADHD 儿童与其无 ADHD 同龄人之间比较的结果。因此,我们进行了一项基于人群的横断面研究,该研究依赖于一个由 3284 名典型儿童和青少年组成的样本,旨在研究父母量表(EFICA-P)和教师量表(EFICA-T)的心理测量特性在结构方程建模框架(SEM)内。进行了探索性和验证性分析,以及 Cronbach 的 alpha 和 McDonald 的 omega 可靠性指数。采用独立的 Welch-t 检验对未经治疗的 ADHD 儿童与其同龄人进行了已知组比较。我们得出结论,父母量表由三个维度组成(冷静指数 1、冷静指数 2 和热指数): (1,649) = 4,607.852 < .01, CFI =.965, TLI.963, RMSEA =.053,而教师量表由两个维度组成(冷静指数和热指数): (1,273) = 5,158.240 < .01, CFI =.991, TLI =.991, RMSEA =.077。这两个量表的内部一致性均>.9。在所有评估的领域中,均发现 ADHD 组之间存在显著差异。这些发现表明,这两个量表在其内部结构方面具有高度的有效性,并且支持其临床实用性。