两份注意力缺陷多动障碍问卷的心理测量特性:在德国儿童和青少年普通人群中比较康纳斯量表和 FBB-HKS——BELLA 研究结果

Psychometric properties of two ADHD questionnaires: comparing the Conners' scale and the FBB-HKS in the general population of German children and adolescents--results of the BELLA study.

作者信息

Erhart Michael, Döpfner Manfred, Ravens-Sieberer Ulrike

机构信息

Department of Psychosomatics in Children and Adolescents, Centre for Obstetrics and Paediatrics, University Clinic Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, W29, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;17 Suppl 1:106-15. doi: 10.1007/s00787-008-1012-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To examine and compare the psychometric properties of two short screening instruments for children and adolescents suffering from attention deficit-/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The Conners' Hyperactivity Index consists of ten items that assess symptoms of hyperactivity through self-report and parents' proxy. The German ADHD Rating scale (FBB-HKS/ADHS) consists of 20 items that assess the severity and perceived burden of inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsiveness as defined by the ICD-10 and DSM-IV.

METHODS

Within the BELLA module of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS), the parents of 2,863 children and adolescents rated the Conners' Hyperactivity Index and the FBB-HKS.

RESULTS

The internal consistency of item responses was assessed via Cronbach's alpha and showed that both instrument scores were able to obtain a reliable measurement. The factorial validity of the FBB-HKS measurement model as well as the unidimensionality of the Conners' scale was tested by means of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA and CFA), indicating satisfactory goodness of fit for the FBB-HKS (RMSEA=0.06) and some deviation from the unidimensionality assumption of the Conners' scale. Stability of results across age could be confirmed with few exceptions. Mean scores differences were found between both sexes, age groups, and different socioeconomic status groups (Winkler-Index) with males, younger respondents, and children with low socioeconomic status displaying more ADHD-related behaviour. Correlation coefficients between the two instruments' scores and other scales assessing emotional and behavioural problems hinted at convergent validity.

CONCLUSION

Both instruments' scores showed reliability as well as factorial and convergent/discriminant validity. The pros and cons of the two instruments as well as for which purpose and under which circumstances one of the measures can be favoured must be considered prior to applying such a measure.

摘要

背景与目的

检验并比较两种用于筛查儿童和青少年注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的简短测评工具的心理测量特性。康纳斯多动指数由10个项目组成,通过自评和家长代理报告来评估多动症状。德国ADHD评定量表(FBB-HKS/ADHS)由20个项目组成,用于评估国际疾病分类第10版(ICD-10)和精神疾病诊断与统计手册第4版(DSM-IV)所定义的注意力不集中、多动和冲动的严重程度及感知负担。

方法

在德国儿童和青少年健康访谈与检查调查(KiGGS)的BELLA模块中,2863名儿童和青少年的家长对康纳斯多动指数和FBB-HKS进行了评分。

结果

通过克朗巴赫α系数评估项目反应的内部一致性,结果表明两种工具的得分均能获得可靠的测量结果。通过探索性和验证性因素分析(EFA和CFA)对FBB-HKS测量模型的因子效度以及康纳斯量表的单维度性进行了检验,结果表明FBB-HKS的拟合优度良好(RMSEA=0.06),而康纳斯量表的单维度性假设存在一些偏差。除少数例外情况外,各年龄组结果的稳定性均可得到证实。在性别、年龄组和不同社会经济地位组(温克勒指数)之间发现了平均得分差异,男性、较年轻的受访者以及社会经济地位较低的儿童表现出更多与ADHD相关的行为。两种工具得分与其他评估情绪和行为问题的量表之间的相关系数表明具有收敛效度。

结论

两种工具的得分均显示出可靠性以及因子效度和收敛/区分效度。在应用此类测量方法之前,必须考虑两种工具的优缺点,以及在何种目的和情况下更倾向于使用其中一种测量方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索