Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America. Scientific Computing and Imaging (SCI) Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
J Neural Eng. 2020 Mar 20;17(2):026012. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab7b1d.
Clinical outcomes from deep brain stimulation (DBS) can be highly variable, and two critical factors underlying this variability are the location and type of stimulation. In this study we quantified how robustly DBS activates a target region when taking into account a range of different lead designs and realistic variations in placement. The objective of the study is to assess the likelihood of achieving target activation.
We performed finite element computational modeling and established a metric of performance robustness to evaluate the ability of directional and multi-lead configurations to activate target fiber pathways while taking into account location variability. A more robust lead configuration produces less variability in activation across all stimulation locations around the target.
Directional leads demonstrated higher overall performance robustness compared to axisymmetric leads, primarily 1-2 mm outside of the target. Multi-lead configurations demonstrated higher levels of robustness compared to any single lead due to distribution of electrodes in a broader region around the target.
Robustness measures can be used to evaluate the performance of existing DBS lead designs and aid in the development of novel lead designs to better accommodate known variability in lead location and orientation. This type of analysis may also be useful to understand how DBS clinical outcome variability is influenced by lead location among groups of patients.
深部脑刺激(DBS)的临床结果可能存在高度变异性,而导致这种变异性的两个关键因素是刺激的位置和类型。在这项研究中,我们定量分析了在考虑到一系列不同的导联设计和实际位置变化的情况下,DBS 激活目标区域的稳健程度。本研究的目的是评估实现目标激活的可能性。
我们进行了有限元计算建模,并建立了一种性能稳健性指标,以评估定向和多导联配置在考虑位置变化的情况下激活目标纤维通路的能力。更稳健的导联配置在目标周围所有刺激位置的激活中产生的变异性更小。
与轴对称导联相比,定向导联总体性能稳健性更高,主要是在目标外 1-2 毫米处。由于电极在目标周围更广泛的区域分布,多导联配置比任何单个导联具有更高的稳健性水平。
稳健性度量可用于评估现有 DBS 导联设计的性能,并有助于开发新的导联设计,以更好地适应已知的导联位置和方向变化。这种分析类型也可能有助于理解 DBS 临床结果变异性如何受到患者群体中导联位置的影响。