Lopes Patricia C, Carlitz Esther H D, Kindel Morgan, König Barbara
Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, CA, United States.
Department of Psychology, Biological Psychology, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2020 Feb 5;14:10. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.00010. eCollection 2020.
Social interactions are critically important for survival and impact overall-health, but also impose costs on animals, such as exposure to contagious agents. The immune system can play a critical role in modulating social behavior when animals are sick, as has been demonstrated within the context of "sickness behaviors." Can immune molecules affect or be affected by social interactions even when animals are not sick, therefore serving a role in mediating pathogen exposure? We tested whether markers of immune function in both the blood and the brain are associated with gregariousness, quantified as number of animals interacted with per day. To do this, we used remote tracking of social interactions of a wild population of house mice () to categorize animals in terms of gregariousness. Blood, hair, brain and other tissue samples from animals with extreme gregariousness phenotypes were collected. We then tested whether the levels of three important cytokines (TNF-α, IFN-γ and IL-1β) in the serum, cortex and hypothalamus of these animals could be explained by the gregariousness phenotype and/or sex of the mice. Using the hair as a long-term quantification of steroid hormones, we also tested whether corticosterone, progesterone and testosterone differed by social phenotype. We found main effects of gregariousness and sex on the serum levels of TNF-α, but not on IFN-γ or IL-1β. Brain gene expression levels were not different between phenotypes. All hair steroids tended to be elevated in animals of high gregariousness phenotype, independent of sex. In sum, elements of the immune system may be associated with gregariousness, even outside of major disease events. These results extend our knowledge of the role that immune signals have in contributing to the regulation of social behaviors outside periods of illness.
社交互动对生存至关重要,并影响整体健康,但也会给动物带来成本,比如接触传染性病原体。当动物生病时,免疫系统在调节社交行为方面可发挥关键作用,这已在“疾病行为”的背景下得到证实。那么,即使动物没有生病,免疫分子是否会影响社交互动或受其影响,从而在介导病原体暴露中发挥作用呢?我们测试了血液和大脑中的免疫功能标志物是否与群居性相关,群居性以每天与之互动的动物数量来量化。为此,我们对野生家鼠种群的社交互动进行远程追踪,以便根据群居性对动物进行分类。收集了具有极端群居性表型的动物的血液、毛发、大脑和其他组织样本。然后,我们测试了这些动物血清、皮质和下丘脑内三种重要细胞因子(肿瘤坏死因子-α、干扰素-γ和白细胞介素-1β)的水平是否可以由小鼠的群居性表型和/或性别来解释。我们还利用毛发作为类固醇激素的长期量化指标,测试了皮质酮、孕酮和睾酮在社交表型上是否存在差异。我们发现群居性和性别对血清中肿瘤坏死因子-α的水平有主要影响,但对干扰素-γ或白细胞介素-1β没有影响。不同表型之间的大脑基因表达水平没有差异。所有毛发类固醇在高群居性表型的动物中往往都会升高,与性别无关。总之,即使在重大疾病事件之外,免疫系统的元素也可能与群居性有关。这些结果扩展了我们对免疫信号在疾病期间之外对社会行为调节作用的认识。