• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从欧洲外科医生的角度评估SAGES安全胆囊切除术计划的实用性。

Evaluation of the usefulness of the SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program from the viewpoint of the European surgeon.

作者信息

Bogacki Paweł, Krzak Jan, Gotfryd-Bugajska Katarzyna, Szura Mirosław

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Experimental Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

Department of Surgery, South Jutland Hospital, Aabenraa, Denmark.

出版信息

Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2020 Mar;15(1):80-86. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2019.83297. Epub 2019 Mar 4.

DOI:10.5114/wiitm.2019.83297
PMID:32117489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7020732/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Common bile duct injury (CBDI) is a severe complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). To minimize its occurrence, SAGES established the Safe Cholecystectomy Program (SCP) with 6 rules to follow during surgery.

AIM

To assess the knowledge of SCP among European surgeons and their opinion on its usefulness.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data were gathered using questionnaires during surgical conferences in Poland and Denmark. The questionnaire asked about the surgeon's experience in cholecystectomy and the number of complications in the form of CBDI. It asked about the surgeon's opinion on the usefulness of SCP rules on a 10-point scale. A comparison between specialists and residents was performed. The study has been registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov - NCT03155321.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-four questionnaires were gathered. One hundred fourteen (61.96%) specialists (72.8% male, mean age: 50 years) and 70 (38.04%) residents (56% male, mean age: 34 years) completed the questionnaire. Mean work experience was 22 years among specialists and 4.5 years among residents. A high percentage of specialists have experienced CBDI (46% vs. 17% of residents, p = 0.014). More specialists are familiar with the SCP than residents (49.3% vs. 21.7%, p = 0.021). Significant differences in the mean usefulness score were observed for three rules: rules 2 and 6 were found more useful by residents (mean score: 7.07 vs. 6.01, p = 0.025 and 8.70 vs. 8.27, p < 0.001), and rule 3 was found more useful by specialists (mean: 8.73 vs. 8.36, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The awareness of the SCP in Europe is low. Participants consider the rules of the SCP to be useful during surgery, although there are differences in the usefulness scores between the groups. An educational program to promote and further implement the SCP should be established.

摘要

引言

胆总管损伤(CBDI)是腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的一种严重并发症。为了尽量减少其发生,美国胃肠内镜外科医师学会(SAGES)制定了安全胆囊切除术计划(SCP),手术期间需遵循6条规则。

目的

评估欧洲外科医生对SCP的了解程度及其对其有用性的看法。

材料与方法

在波兰和丹麦的外科会议期间通过问卷调查收集数据。问卷询问了外科医生的胆囊切除术经验以及以CBDI形式出现的并发症数量。它以10分制询问了外科医生对SCP规则有用性的看法。对专家和住院医师进行了比较。该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册 - NCT03155321。

结果

共收集到184份问卷。114名(61.96%)专家(72.8%为男性,平均年龄:50岁)和70名(38.04%)住院医师(56%为男性,平均年龄:34岁)完成了问卷。专家的平均工作经验为22年,住院医师为4.5年。有较高比例的专家经历过CBDI(46%,而住院医师为17%,p = 0.014)。熟悉SCP的专家比住院医师更多(49.3%对21.7%,p = 0.021)。在三条规则的平均有用性评分上观察到显著差异:住院医师认为规则2和6更有用(平均评分:7.07对6.01,p = 0.025;8.70对8.27,p < 0.001),而专家认为规则3更有用(平均:8.73对8.36,p < 0.001)。

结论

欧洲对SCP的认知度较低。参与者认为SCP规则在手术期间有用,尽管两组之间在有用性评分上存在差异。应建立一个推广和进一步实施SCP的教育计划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c07f/7020732/486cbfd82ab4/WIITM-15-35963-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c07f/7020732/786c36dc6770/WIITM-15-35963-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c07f/7020732/486cbfd82ab4/WIITM-15-35963-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c07f/7020732/786c36dc6770/WIITM-15-35963-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c07f/7020732/486cbfd82ab4/WIITM-15-35963-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the usefulness of the SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program from the viewpoint of the European surgeon.从欧洲外科医生的角度评估SAGES安全胆囊切除术计划的实用性。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2020 Mar;15(1):80-86. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2019.83297. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
2
Risk tolerance and bile duct injury: surgeon characteristics, risk-taking preference, and common bile duct injuries.风险承受能力与胆管损伤:外科医生特征、冒险偏好及胆总管损伤
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Jul;209(1):17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.02.063. Epub 2009 May 1.
3
Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆管损伤:一项全国性调查结果
Ann Surg. 2001 Oct;234(4):549-58; discussion 558-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200110000-00014.
4
Increasing resident utilization and recognition of the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a pilot study from an academic medical center.提高住院医师在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中对安全关键视角的利用率和认知度:一项来自学术医疗中心的试点研究。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Apr;31(4):1627-1635. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5150-0. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
5
Does the surgeon's experience influence the outcome of laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones?外科医生的经验是否会影响腹腔镜治疗胆总管结石的结果?
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jan;27(1):176-80. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2416-z. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
6
Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database.腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者围手术期并发症的危险因素:对瑞士腹腔镜与胸腔镜外科学会数据库中22953例连续病例的分析
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Nov;203(5):723-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.07.018. Epub 2006 Sep 20.
7
The dramatic reality of biliary tract injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. An anonymous multicenter Belgian survey of 65 patients.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆道损伤的严峻现实。比利时一项针对65例患者的匿名多中心调查。
Surg Endosc. 1997 Dec;11(12):1171-8. doi: 10.1007/s004649900563.
8
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic single-incision cholecystectomy: results of a randomized controlled trial.机器人辅助与腹腔镜单孔胆囊切除术的随机对照试验结果。
Surg Endosc. 2019 May;33(5):1482-1490. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6430-7. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
9
Characterization of common bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a high-volume hospital system.高容量医院系统中腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胆总管损伤的特征。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1184-1191. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5790-8. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
10
Senior versus proctored young and resident surgeons' experience in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is there any need of previous exposure to open biliary surgery?资深外科医生与有监考的年轻外科医生及住院医生在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的经验:是否需要以往有开腹胆道手术的经验?
J Laparoendosc Surg. 1995 Oct;5(5):303-7. doi: 10.1089/lps.1995.5.303.

引用本文的文献

1
The Association of Polish Surgeons (APS) clinical guidelines for the use of laparoscopy in the management of abdominal emergencies. Part I.波兰外科医生协会(APS)关于腹腔镜检查在腹部急症处理中应用的临床指南。第一部分。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023 Jun;18(2):187-212. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2023.127877. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
2
Major iatrogenic bile duct injury during elective cholecystectomy: a Czech population register-based study.择期胆囊切除术时主要医源性胆管损伤:一项捷克人群登记研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Apr 20;408(1):154. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02897-2.
3
Educational Scoring System in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Is It the Right Time to Standardize?

本文引用的文献

1
Initial experience with endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage.内镜超声引导下胆囊引流的初步经验。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2019 Apr;14(2):195-202. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2018.79528. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
2
Bile duct injury and morbidity following cholecystectomy: a need for improvement.胆囊切除术后胆管损伤和发病率:需要改进。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1683-1688. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5847-8. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
3
Concerns of Quality and Safety in Public Domain Surgical Education Videos: An Assessment of the Critical View of Safety in Frequently Used Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Videos.
腹腔镜胆囊切除术的教学评分系统:是否到了标准化的时机?
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Feb 23;59(3):446. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030446.
4
Recommendation for cholecystectomy protocol based on intraoperative ultrasound - a single-centre retrospective case-control study.基于术中超声的胆囊切除术方案推荐——一项单中心回顾性病例对照研究。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2021 Mar;16(1):54-61. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2020.93999. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
5
The evaluation of B-SAFE and ultrasonographic landmarks in safe orientation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中B-SAFE及超声标志在安全定位中的评估
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2020 Dec;15(4):546-552. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2020.100972. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
公共领域外科教育视频中的质量与安全问题:对常用腹腔镜胆囊切除术视频中安全批判性观点的评估
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Dec;225(6):725-730. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.08.016. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
4
Characterization of common bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a high-volume hospital system.高容量医院系统中腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胆总管损伤的特征。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1184-1191. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5790-8. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
5
Increasing resident utilization and recognition of the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a pilot study from an academic medical center.提高住院医师在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中对安全关键视角的利用率和认知度:一项来自学术医疗中心的试点研究。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Apr;31(4):1627-1635. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5150-0. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
6
How often do surgeons obtain the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy?外科医生在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中获得安全关键视野的频率是多少?
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):142-146. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4943-5. Epub 2016 May 3.
7
Comparison of treatment costs of laparoscopic and open surgery.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗费用的比较。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2015 Sep;10(3):437-41. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2015.54055. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
8
Current practices in biliary surgery: Do we practice what we teach?胆道外科的当前实践:我们所教授的内容我们自己践行了吗?
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3345-50. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4609-8. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
9
Beyond the learning curve: incidence of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy normalize to open in the modern era.超越学习曲线:现代腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胆管损伤发生率已与开腹手术相当。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2239-43. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4485-2. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
10
Recent classifications of the common bile duct injury.胆总管损伤的近期分类
Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2014 Aug;18(3):69-72. doi: 10.14701/kjhbps.2014.18.3.69. Epub 2014 Aug 31.