Czech Marcin, Baran-Kooiker Aleksandra, Atikeler Kagan, Demirtshyan Maria, Gaitova Kamilla, Holownia-Voloskova Malwina, Turcu-Stiolica Adina, Kooiker Coen, Piniazhko Oresta, Konstandyan Natella, Zalis'ka Olha, Sykut-Cegielska Jolanta
Department of Pharmacoeconomics, The Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland.
Department of Pharmacoeconomics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Front Public Health. 2020 Jan 28;7:416. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00416. eCollection 2019.
Despite international initiatives on collaboration within the field of rare diseases, patient access to orphan medicinal products (OMPs) and healthcare services differ greatly between countries. This study aimed to create a comprehensive and in-depth overview of rare diseases policies and reimbursement of OMPs in a selection of 12 countries in the Western Eurasian region: Armenia, France, Germany, Kazakhstan, Latvia, The Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Russia, Turkey, Ukraine, and the United Kingdom. A systematic literature review was performed and an analysis of publicly available legislative and rare disease health policy data was undertaken in five focus areas: rare disease definition, newborn screening, registries, national plans, access to/reimbursement of OMPs. Screening programs are broadly implemented but the number of screened diseases differs significantly (2-35 diseases), either between EU and non-EU countries, between EU member states and sometimes even within a single country. In most countries rare disease registries are operating with regional, national, European or worldwide coverage. The number of rare disease registries is growing, as a result of the National Plans (EU) and increased international scientific cooperation. France, Russia, and Poland have a centrally acting registry. National plans are present in all EU countries but implementation varies and is ongoing. The number of reimbursed OMPs in the selected countries ranges from nearly all available OMPs in the Netherlands, Germany, and France to zero in Armenia. Reimbursement rules differ considerably regionally and a trend is observed of reimbursement conditions getting stricter for expensive (orphan) drugs. Inequality in patient access to new OMPs still exists due to variations in national policies, healthcare budgets, health insurance, and reimbursement systems. The observed differences are challenging for rare disease patients, health authorities and manufacturers alike. Progress can be seen, however, and international cooperation and harmonization is slowly but steadily expanding in the rare disease arena.
尽管在罕见病领域有国际合作倡议,但各国患者在获得孤儿药品(OMPs)和医疗服务方面仍存在巨大差异。本研究旨在全面深入地概述西亚地区12个国家的罕见病政策及OMPs报销情况,这12个国家分别是:亚美尼亚、法国、德国、哈萨克斯坦、拉脱维亚、荷兰、波兰、罗马尼亚、俄罗斯、土耳其、乌克兰和英国。进行了系统的文献综述,并在五个重点领域对公开可用的立法和罕见病健康政策数据进行了分析:罕见病定义、新生儿筛查、登记处、国家计划、OMPs的获取/报销。筛查项目广泛实施,但筛查疾病的数量差异很大(2 - 35种疾病),无论是在欧盟和非欧盟国家之间、欧盟成员国之间,有时甚至在一个国家内部。在大多数国家,罕见病登记处的覆盖范围涵盖区域、国家、欧洲或全球。由于国家计划(欧盟)和国际科学合作的增加,罕见病登记处的数量在不断增加。法国、俄罗斯和波兰有中央登记处。所有欧盟国家都有国家计划,但实施情况各不相同且仍在进行中。在所选定的国家中,报销的OMPs数量从荷兰、德国和法国几乎所有可用的OMPs到亚美尼亚的零报销不等。报销规则在地区上差异很大,并且观察到一种趋势,即昂贵(孤儿)药物的报销条件越来越严格。由于国家政策、医疗预算、医疗保险和报销系统的差异,患者在获取新OMPs方面仍存在不平等现象。观察到的差异对罕见病患者、卫生当局和制造商来说都是挑战。然而,可以看到取得了进展,并且在罕见病领域,国际合作与协调正在缓慢但稳步地扩大。