• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

DOI:10.3310/hsdr08100
PMID:32119231
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ambulance services have a vital role in the shift towards the delivery of health care outside hospitals, when this is better for patients, by offering alternatives to transfer to the emergency department. The introduction of information technology in ambulance services to electronically capture, interpret, store and transfer patient data can support out-of-hospital care.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to understand how electronic health records can be most effectively implemented in a pre-hospital context in order to support a safe and effective shift from acute to community-based care, and how their potential benefits can be maximised.

DESIGN AND SETTING

We carried out a study using multiple methods and with four work packages: (1) a rapid literature review; (2) a telephone survey of all 13 freestanding UK ambulance services; (3) detailed case studies examining electronic health record use through qualitative methods and analysis of routine data in four selected sites consisting of UK ambulance services and their associated health economies; and (4) a knowledge-sharing workshop.

RESULTS

We found limited literature on electronic health records. Only half of the UK ambulance services had electronic health records in use at the time of data collection, with considerable variation in hardware and software and some reversion to use of paper records as services transitioned between systems. The case studies found that the ambulance services’ electronic health records were in a state of change. Not all patient contacts resulted in the generation of electronic health records. Ambulance clinicians were dealing with partial or unclear information, which may not fit comfortably with the electronic health records. Ambulance clinicians continued to use indirect data input approaches (such as first writing on a glove) even when using electronic health records. The primary function of electronic health records in all services seemed to be as a store for patient data. There was, as yet, limited evidence of electronic health records’ full potential being realised to transfer information, support decision-making or change patient care.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations included the difficulty of obtaining sets of matching routine data for analysis, difficulties of attributing any change in practice to electronic health records within a complex system and the rapidly changing environment, which means that some of our observations may no longer reflect reality.

CONCLUSIONS

Realising all the benefits of electronic health records requires engagement with other parts of the local health economy and dealing with variations between providers and the challenges of interoperability. Clinicians and data managers, and those working in different parts of the health economy, are likely to want very different things from a data set and need to be presented with only the information that they need.

FUTURE WORK

There is scope for future work analysing ambulance service routine data sets, qualitative work to examine transfer of information at the emergency department and patients’ perspectives on record-keeping, and to develop and evaluate feedback to clinicians based on patient records.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as Health and Care Research Wales Clinical Research Portfolio 34166.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in ; Vol. 8, No. 10. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

摘要

相似文献

1
2
Identifying models of care to improve outcomes for older people with urgent care needs: a mixed methods approach to develop a system dynamics model.确定照护模式以改善有紧急照护需求的老年人的结局:一种开发系统动力学模型的混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Sep;11(14):1-183. doi: 10.3310/NLCT5104.
3
Community First Responders' role in the current and future rural health and care workforce: a mixed-methods study.社区第一响应者在当前和未来农村卫生和保健劳动力中的作用:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(18):1-101. doi: 10.3310/JYRT8674.
4
Developing feasible person-centred care alternatives to emergency department responses for adults with epilepsy: a discrete choice analysis mixed-methods study.为癫痫成人制定可行的以患者为中心的护理替代急诊治疗方案:一项离散选择分析混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Aug;12(24):1-158. doi: 10.3310/HKQW4129.
5
6
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of paramedics working in general practice: a mixed-methods realist evaluation.护理人员在全科医疗中的临床效果及成本效益:一项混合方法的现实主义评价
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Feb;13(6):1-137. doi: 10.3310/GTJJ3104.
7
Evaluation of different models of general practitioners working in or alongside emergency departments: a mixed-methods realist evaluation.评价在急诊科工作或合作的全科医生的不同模式:混合方法现实主义评价。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Apr;12(10):1-152. doi: 10.3310/JWQZ5348.
8
Prehospital continuous positive airway pressure for acute respiratory failure: the ACUTE feasibility RCT.院前持续气道正压通气治疗急性呼吸衰竭:ACUTE 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Feb;25(7):1-92. doi: 10.3310/hta25070.
9
Support and Assessment for Fall Emergency Referrals (SAFER) 2: a cluster randomised trial and systematic review of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of new protocols for emergency ambulance paramedics to assess older people following a fall with referral to community-based care when appropriate.跌倒紧急转诊的支持与评估(SAFER)2:一项整群随机试验以及对新协议临床有效性和成本效益的系统评价,该协议用于紧急救护医护人员评估跌倒后的老年人,并在适当时转诊至社区护理。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Mar;21(13):1-218. doi: 10.3310/hta21130.
10
A rapid mixed-methods evaluation of remote home monitoring models during the COVID-19 pandemic in England.英格兰 COVID-19 大流行期间远程家庭监护模式的快速混合方法评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(13):1-151. doi: 10.3310/FVQW4410.