文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

社区第一响应者在当前和未来农村卫生和保健劳动力中的作用:一项混合方法研究。

Community First Responders' role in the current and future rural health and care workforce: a mixed-methods study.

机构信息

Community and Health Research Unit, School of Health and Social Care, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.

Aberystwyth Business School, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, UK.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(18):1-101. doi: 10.3310/JYRT8674.


DOI:10.3310/JYRT8674
PMID:39054745
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Community First Responders are trained volunteers dispatched by ambulance services to potentially life-threatening emergencies such as cardiac arrest in the first vital minutes to provide care until highly skilled ambulance staff arrive. Community First Responder schemes were first introduced to support ambulance services in rural communities, where access to prehospital emergency care is more likely to be delayed. Evidence is lacking on their contribution to rural healthcare provision, how care is provided and how this might be improved. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to describe Community First Responder activities, organisation, costs of provision and outcomes of care together with perceptions and views of patients, public, Community First Responders, ambulance service staff and commissioners of their current and future role including innovations in the rural health and care workforce. DESIGN: We used a mixed-methods design, using a lens of pragmatism and the 'actor', 'behaviour change' and 'causal pathway' framework to integrate quantitative routine and qualitative (policy, guideline and protocol documents with stakeholder interview) data from 6 of 10 English ambulance services. We identified potential innovations in Community First Responder provision and prioritised these using a modified nominal group technique. Patients and public were involved throughout the study. RESULTS: In 4.5 million incidents from six English regional ambulance services during 2019, pre COVID-19 pandemic, Community First Responders attended first a higher proportion of calls in rural areas (almost 4% of calls) than in urban areas (around 1.5%). They were significantly more likely to be called out to rural (vs. urban) areas and to attend older (vs. younger), white (vs. minority ethnic) people in more affluent (vs. deprived) areas with cardiorespiratory and neurological (vs. other emergency) conditions for higher-priority emergency or urgent (category 1 and 2 compared with category 3, 4 or 5) calls but did also attend lower-category calls for conditions such as falls. We examined 10 documents from seven ambulance services. Ambulance policies and protocols integrated Community First Responders into ambulance service structures to achieve the safe and effective operation of volunteers. Costs, mainly for training, equipment and support, varied widely but were not always clearly delineated. Community First Responders enabled a faster prehospital response time. There was no clear benefit in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes. A specific Community First Responder falls response reduced ambulance attendances and was potentially cost saving. We conducted semistructured interviews with 47 different stakeholders engaged in Community First Responder functions. This showed the trajectory of becoming a Community First Responder, the Community First Responder role, governance and practice, and the positive views of Community First Responders from stakeholders despite public lack of understanding of their role. Community First Responders' scope of practice varied between ambulance services and had developed into new areas. Innovations prioritised at the consensus workshop were changes in processes and structures and an expanded scope of practice supported by training, which included counselling, peer support, better communication with the control room, navigation and communication technology, and specific mandatory and standardised training for Community First Responders. LIMITATIONS: Missing data and small numbers of interviews in some stakeholder groups (patients, commissioners) are sources of bias. FUTURE RESEARCH: Future research should include a robust evaluation of innovations involving Community First Responders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered as ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04279262. FUNDING: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR127920) and is published in full in ; Vol. 12, No. 18. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

摘要

背景:社区第一响应者是由救护车服务部门派遣的经过培训的志愿者,他们在潜在的危及生命的紧急情况下(如心脏骤停),在第一时间提供护理,直到高技能的救护车工作人员到达。社区第一响应者计划最初是为了支持农村社区的救护车服务而引入的,在这些地方,获得院前急救的可能性更有可能延迟。目前还缺乏关于他们对农村医疗保健服务的贡献、护理提供方式以及如何改进的证据。

目的:我们旨在描述社区第一响应者的活动、组织、提供服务的成本和护理结果,以及患者、公众、社区第一响应者、救护车服务人员和服务提供商对他们当前和未来角色的看法和观点,包括农村卫生和保健劳动力的创新。

设计:我们使用了混合方法设计,采用实用主义的视角以及“行为改变”和“因果途径”框架,从 10 个英国救护车服务中的 6 个整合了定量常规数据和定性数据(政策、指南和协议文件以及利益相关者访谈)。我们确定了社区第一响应者提供方面的潜在创新,并使用修改后的名义小组技术对这些创新进行了优先排序。患者和公众在整个研究过程中都参与其中。

结果:在 2019 年 COVID-19 大流行之前的 450 万起事件中,社区第一响应者在农村地区(几乎占呼叫的 4%)比在城市地区(约占 1.5%)更有可能首先接到电话。他们更有可能被派往农村(与城市相比)地区,并在较富裕(与贫困相比)地区,为更年长(与年轻)、白人(与少数民族)、患有心肺和神经(与其他紧急情况)疾病的人提供更高优先级的紧急或紧急(类别 1 和 2 与类别 3、4 或 5 相比)呼叫,但也会接听较低级别的呼叫,例如跌倒。我们检查了来自七个救护车服务的 10 份文件。救护车政策和协议将社区第一响应者整合到救护车服务结构中,以实现志愿者的安全有效运作。成本主要用于培训、设备和支持,差异很大,但并不总是明确划分。社区第一响应者使院前反应时间更快。在院外心脏骤停结果方面没有明显的好处。专门针对社区第一响应者跌倒的响应减少了救护车的出勤次数,并且具有潜在的成本效益。我们对参与社区第一响应者职能的 47 名不同利益相关者进行了半结构式访谈。这展示了成为社区第一响应者的轨迹、社区第一响应者的角色、治理和实践,以及尽管公众对他们的角色缺乏了解,但利益相关者对社区第一响应者的积极看法。救护车服务之间社区第一响应者的实践范围有所不同,并且已经发展到新的领域。共识研讨会优先考虑的创新是流程和结构的变化,以及培训支持的扩大实践范围,包括咨询、同伴支持、与控制室更好的沟通、导航和通信技术,以及社区第一响应者的特定强制性和标准化培训。

局限性:一些利益相关者群体(患者、服务提供商)的数据缺失和访谈人数较少是产生偏差的原因。

未来研究:未来的研究应包括对涉及社区第一响应者的创新进行严格评估。

试验注册:该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,注册号为 NCT04279262。

资金:该奖项由英国国家卫生与保健卓越研究所(NIHR)健康与社会保健交付研究计划(NIHR 奖 REF:NIHR127920)资助,并在全文中发表;第 12 卷,第 18 期。有关该奖项的更多信息,请访问 NIHR 资助和奖项网站。

相似文献

[1]
Community First Responders' role in the current and future rural health and care workforce: a mixed-methods study.

Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024-7

[2]
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.

Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025-6

[3]
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training

2025-1

[4]
Consequences, costs and cost-effectiveness of workforce configurations in English acute hospitals.

Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025-7

[5]
Reducing health inequalities through general practice: a realist review and action framework.

Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024-3

[6]
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.

Health Technol Assess. 2001

[7]
Emergency Medical Services Streaming Enabled Evaluation In Trauma: The SEE-IT Feasibility RCT.

Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025-5-28

[8]
Group-based interventions to reduce gambling involvement among male football fans: a synopsis of findings from a feasibility study.

Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025-7

[9]
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.

Autism Adulthood. 2025-5-28

[10]
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.

Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025-5-21

引用本文的文献

[1]
Consensus on innovations and future directions of community first responder schemes in United Kingdom: a national nominal group technique study.

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024-9-30

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索