Fiedler Matthew
Matthew Fiedler ( mfiedler@brookings. edu ) is a fellow in the University of Southern California-Brookings Schaeffer Initiative for Health Policy, Economic Studies Program, Brookings Institution, in Washington, D.C.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Mar;39(3):429-435. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01433.
The Affordable Care Act required most people to obtain health insurance or pay a tax penalty. Legislation enacted in December 2017 effectively repealed that requirement, starting in 2019. This article reviews recent research on the mandate's effects, concluding that the mandate meaningfully increased insurance coverage, but likely by less than was projected before implementation. These coverage gains are likely to erode as mandate repeal takes hold. Looking ahead, policy makers have many options for expanding insurance coverage without restoring an individual mandate. However, achieving universal coverage without some form of mandatory individual contribution to health insurance would have a very large fiscal cost.
《平价医疗法案》要求大多数人购买医疗保险,否则将缴纳罚款。2017年12月颁布的立法从2019年开始实际上废除了这一要求。本文回顾了近期关于该强制要求效果的研究,得出的结论是,该强制要求显著增加了保险覆盖范围,但增幅可能低于实施前的预期。随着强制要求的废除生效,这些覆盖范围的增加可能会逐渐消失。展望未来,政策制定者在不恢复个人强制要求的情况下有许多扩大保险覆盖范围的选择。然而,在没有某种形式的个人对医疗保险的强制性贡献的情况下实现全民覆盖将带来非常巨大的财政成本。