• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

奥巴马医改:文献计量学视角。

Obamacare: A bibliometric perspective.

机构信息

Faculty of Political Sciences and Administration, Granada University, Granada, Spain.

Faculty of Statistics, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 12;10:979064. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.979064. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.979064
PMID:36033824
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9416003/
Abstract

Obamacare is the colloquial name given to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) signed into law by President Obama in the USA, which ultimately aims to provide universal access to health care services for US citizens. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the political-legal, economic, social, management (or administrative), and medical (or health) repercussions of this law, using a bibliometric methodology as a basis. In addition, the main contributors to research on ACA issues have been identified in terms of authors, organizations, journals, and countries. The downward trend in scientific production on this law has been noted, and it has been concluded that a balance has not yet been reached between the coexistence of private and public health care that guarantees broad social coverage without economic or other types of barriers. The law requires political consensus to be implemented in a definitive and global manner for the whole of the United States.

摘要

奥巴马医改是人们对美国总统奥巴马签署的《平价医疗法案》的俗称,该法案最终旨在为美国公民提供全民医疗服务。本文旨在采用文献计量学方法,概述该法律在政治-法律、经济、社会、管理(或行政)和医疗(或健康)方面的影响。此外,还根据作者、组织、期刊和国家等因素,确定了研究《平价医疗法案》问题的主要贡献者。该法律的科学研究呈下降趋势,结论是,在保证广泛的社会覆盖面而不存在经济或其他类型障碍的前提下,公私医疗共存之间的平衡尚未实现。该法律需要政治共识,以全面和全面的方式在美国各地实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b6/9416003/c68d3892b67f/fpubh-10-979064-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b6/9416003/7b9a0570da99/fpubh-10-979064-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b6/9416003/a323758957e8/fpubh-10-979064-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b6/9416003/bfd4d16f6a2a/fpubh-10-979064-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b6/9416003/1ebc4a6fac7a/fpubh-10-979064-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b6/9416003/ebece61a17a1/fpubh-10-979064-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b6/9416003/1e5816c0cdff/fpubh-10-979064-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b6/9416003/371d8ba3c549/fpubh-10-979064-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b6/9416003/c68d3892b67f/fpubh-10-979064-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b6/9416003/7b9a0570da99/fpubh-10-979064-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b6/9416003/a323758957e8/fpubh-10-979064-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b6/9416003/bfd4d16f6a2a/fpubh-10-979064-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b6/9416003/1ebc4a6fac7a/fpubh-10-979064-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b6/9416003/ebece61a17a1/fpubh-10-979064-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b6/9416003/1e5816c0cdff/fpubh-10-979064-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b6/9416003/371d8ba3c549/fpubh-10-979064-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b6/9416003/c68d3892b67f/fpubh-10-979064-g0008.jpg

相似文献

1
Obamacare: A bibliometric perspective.奥巴马医改:文献计量学视角。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 12;10:979064. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.979064. eCollection 2022.
2
A Critical Analysis of Obamacare: Affordable Care or Insurance for Many and Coverage for Few?对奥巴马医改的批判性分析:是可承受的医疗保健,还是惠及多数人的保险和少数人的覆盖范围?
Pain Physician. 2017 Mar;20(3):111-138.
3
Evolution of US Health Care Reform.美国医疗保健改革的演变
Pain Physician. 2017 Mar;20(3):107-110.
4
Obamacare 2012: prognosis unclear for interventional pain management.奥巴马医改 2012 年:介入性疼痛管理的预后尚不清楚。
Pain Physician. 2012 Sep-Oct;15(5):E629-40.
5
Repeal and Replace of Affordable Care: A Complex, but Not an Impossible Task.废除与取代《平价医疗法案》:一项复杂但并非不可能完成的任务。
Pain Physician. 2016 Nov-Dec;19(8):E1109-E1113.
6
Why do so many Americans oppose the Affordable Care Act?为什么这么多美国人反对平价医疗法案?
Am J Med. 2015 Aug;128(8):807-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.01.032. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
7
Achieving a deeper understanding of the implemented provisions of the Affordable Care Act.更深入地理解《平价医疗法案》的实施条款。
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2014:e472-7. doi: 10.14694/EdBook_AM.2014.34.e472.
8
What's at Stake in U.S. Health Reform: A Guide to the Affordable Care Act and Value-Based Care.美国医疗改革的利害关系:《平价医疗法案》与价值医疗指南
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2017 May;18(2):61-71. doi: 10.1177/1527154417720935. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
9
Does Question Wording Predict Support for the Affordable Care Act? An Analysis of Polling During the Implementation Period, 2010-2016.问题措辞是否能预测对《平价医疗法案》的支持?对实施期间(2010-2016 年)民意调查的分析。
Health Commun. 2018 Jul;33(7):816-823. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1315676. Epub 2017 May 4.
10
Implementing the Affordable Care Act: The Promise and Limits of Health Care Reform.实施《平价医疗法案》:医疗保健改革的前景与局限
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2016 Aug;41(4):803-26. doi: 10.1215/03616878-3620953. Epub 2016 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Data Sources as a Driver for Market-Oriented Tourism Organizations: a Bibliometric Perspective.作为市场导向型旅游组织驱动力的数据来源:文献计量学视角
J Knowl Econ. 2023 May 25:1-34. doi: 10.1007/s13132-023-01334-5.
2
Healthcare Systems across Europe and the US: The Managed Entry Agreements Experience.欧洲和美国的医疗保健系统:有条件准入协议的经验
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 3;11(3):447. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030447.

本文引用的文献

1
Health Insurance Prevalence Among Gender Minority People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.性少数群体的健康保险普及率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Transgend Health. 2022 Aug 1;7(4):292-302. doi: 10.1089/trgh.2020.0182. eCollection 2022 Aug.
2
Evaluating Medicaid expansion benefits for patients with cancer: National Cancer Database analysis and systematic review.评估癌症患者的医疗补助扩展福利:国家癌症数据库分析和系统评价。
J Cancer Policy. 2021 Sep;29:100292. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2021.100292. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
3
Compact for care: how the Affordable Care Act marketplaces fell short for a vulnerable population in Hawaii.
《关怀契约:平价医疗法案市场如何未能满足夏威夷弱势人群的需求》。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Nov;6(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007701.
4
Minding the Gaps: Health Care Access for Foreign-born People in the U.S.: An Integrative Review.关注差距:美国出生的外国人获得医疗保健的机会:综合评论。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2021;32(4):1653-1674. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2021.0158.
5
Understanding the Implications of Medicaid Expansion for Cancer Care in the US: A Review.理解美国医疗补助扩展对癌症护理的影响:综述。
JAMA Oncol. 2022 Jan 1;8(1):139-148. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.4323.
6
US Nonprofit Hospitals' Community Health Needs Assessments and Implementation Strategies in the Era of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.美国非营利性医院在《患者保护与平价医疗法案》时代的社区健康需求评估及实施策略
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2122237. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.22237.
7
The Impact of the Affordable Care Act on Dental Care: An Integrative Literature Review.平价医疗法案对牙科护理的影响:综合文献回顾。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 25;18(15):7865. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157865.
8
Health insurance enrollment strategies during the Affordable Care Act (ACA): a scoping review on what worked and for whom.《平价医疗法案》(ACA)实施期间的医疗保险参保策略:关于有效措施及适用人群的范围综述
Arch Public Health. 2021 Jul 12;79(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00645-w.
9
Utilization Impact of Cost-Sharing Elimination for Preventive Care Services: A Rapid Review.消除预防性保健服务费用分担的利用影响:快速综述
Med Care Res Rev. 2022 Apr;79(2):175-197. doi: 10.1177/10775587211027372. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
10
Health insurance, pediatric asthma, and emergency department usage.健康保险、小儿哮喘与急诊科就诊情况。
Public Health Nurs. 2021 Sep;38(5):931-940. doi: 10.1111/phn.12926. Epub 2021 May 21.