• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正畸托槽通用自酸蚀一步法粘结系统的粘结强度

Bond Strength of Universal Self-Etch 1-Step Adhesive Systems for Orthodontic Brackets.

作者信息

Cerone Melissa, El-Badrawy Wafa, Gong Siew-Ging, Prakki Anuradha

出版信息

J Can Dent Assoc. 2019 Aug;85:j6.

PMID:32119639
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets bonded to uncut enamel with universal self-etch 1-step adhesive systems.

METHODS

Extracted uncut premolars (n = 160) were randomly divided into 4 groups for treatment with Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SU), All-Bond Universal (BU), Clearfil Universal Bond (CU) or the control, Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive. Following bonding of brackets on tooth surfaces, teeth were stored in distilled water for 24 h and 6 months, and brackets were tested for SBS. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) and quantitative percentage of remaining resin (%RR) were recorded. Scanning electron microscopy was used to analyze debonded surfaces qualitatively. SBS and %RR data were analyzed by 2-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey test (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

At neither time did these universal adhesives achieve satisfactory SBS for orthodontic treatment. The control group had the highest SBS, ARI score and mean %RR (and these differences were significant), while the BU group had the lowest SBS. SBS mean values and ARI scores decreased over time for SU and BU, but remained stable for CU. There was no difference in %RR among the universal adhesives tested.

CONCLUSION

None of the universal adhesives used in self-etch mode achieved SBS values (at 24 h and 6 months) that were satisfactory for orthodontic treatment.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估使用通用自酸蚀一步法粘结系统将正畸托槽粘结到未切割牙釉质上的剪切粘结强度(SBS)。

方法

将拔除的未切割前磨牙(n = 160)随机分为4组,分别用3M Scotchbond通用粘结剂(SU)、全效通用粘结剂(BU)、可乐丽通用粘结剂(CU)进行处理,或作为对照使用3M Adper Scotchbond多功能粘结剂。在牙齿表面粘结托槽后,将牙齿在蒸馏水中保存24小时和6个月,然后测试托槽的SBS。记录粘结剂残留指数(ARI)和剩余树脂的定量百分比(%RR)。使用扫描电子显微镜对脱粘表面进行定性分析。SBS和%RR数据采用双向方差分析,然后进行Tukey检验(α = 0.05)。

结果

在这两个时间点,这些通用粘结剂均未获得令人满意的正畸治疗SBS。对照组的SBS、ARI评分和平均%RR最高(且这些差异具有统计学意义),而BU组的SBS最低。SU和BU组的SBS平均值和ARI评分随时间下降,但CU组保持稳定。所测试的通用粘结剂之间的%RR没有差异。

结论

在自酸蚀模式下使用的通用粘结剂均未获得(在24小时和6个月时)令人满意的正畸治疗SBS值。

相似文献

1
Bond Strength of Universal Self-Etch 1-Step Adhesive Systems for Orthodontic Brackets.正畸托槽通用自酸蚀一步法粘结系统的粘结强度
J Can Dent Assoc. 2019 Aug;85:j6.
2
Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different self-etching adhesives.使用不同自酸蚀粘接剂粘接的正畸托槽的剪切粘接强度。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Sep;136(3):425-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.024.
3
Effect of self-etchant pH on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.自酸蚀剂pH值对正畸托槽剪切粘结强度的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Aug;134(2):203-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.07.039.
4
Shear bond strength of two 2-step etch-and-rinse adhesives when bonding ceramic brackets to bovine enamel.将陶瓷托槽粘结到牛牙釉质上时两种两步酸蚀冲洗粘结剂的剪切粘结强度。
Int Orthod. 2017 Sep;15(3):388-404. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
5
Effects of a fluoride-containing casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate complex on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.含氟酪蛋白磷酸肽-无定形磷酸钙复合物对正畸托槽粘结强度的影响。
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Apr;34(2):193-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq183. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
6
Clinical acceptability of two self-etch adhesive resins for the bonding of orthodontic brackets to enamel.两种自酸蚀粘结树脂用于正畸托槽与牙釉质粘结的临床可接受性。
J Orthod. 2012 Dec;39(4):256-61. doi: 10.1179/1465312512Z.00000000038.
7
Effects of one-step orthodontic adhesive on microleakage and bracket bond strength: An in vitro comparative study.一步法正畸粘接剂对微渗漏和托槽粘接强度的影响:体外对比研究。
Int Orthod. 2020 Jun;18(2):366-373. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2020.01.010. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
8
Effect of nanotechnology in self-etch bonding systems on the shear bond strength of stainless steel orthodontic brackets.纳米技术在自酸蚀粘结系统中对不锈钢正畸托槽剪切粘结强度的影响。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2017 Feb;22(1):47-56. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.22.1.047-056.oar.
9
Enamel shear bond strength of two orthodontic self-etching bonding systems compared to Transbond™ XT.与Transbond™ XT相比,两种正畸自酸蚀粘结系统的釉质剪切粘结强度。
J Orofac Orthop. 2016 Nov;77(6):391-399. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0046-0. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
10
Orthodontic Bracket Bonding Using Self-adhesive Cement to Facilitate Bracket Debonding.使用自粘接剂粘结正畸托槽以促进托槽的脱落。
J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(6):551-556. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a43652.

引用本文的文献

1
Shear bond strength of a RMGIC for orthodontic bracket bonding to enamel.用于正畸托槽粘结至牙釉质的树脂改良玻璃离子水门汀的剪切粘结强度。
BDJ Open. 2024 Jan 2;10(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41405-023-00181-5.
2
Cyclic shear fatigue of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel using self-adhering flowable composites.使用自粘接可流动复合材料粘接于牙釉质的正畸托槽的循环剪切疲劳
Saudi Dent J. 2023 Nov;35(7):834-840. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.07.014. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
3
Influence of resin infiltration pretreatment on the microleakage under orthodontic bracket (an study).
树脂渗透预处理对正畸托槽下微渗漏的影响(一项研究)
J Orthod Sci. 2023 Sep 4;12:43. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_102_22. eCollection 2023.
4
Orthodontic bond strength with the use of non-aerosol producing bonding primers in lieu of conventional primers: An evaluation.使用非气雾剂型粘结底漆替代传统底漆时的正畸粘结强度:一项评估。
J Orthod Sci. 2022 Oct 13;11:51. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_134_21. eCollection 2022.
5
Comparative evaluation and influence of new Optibond eXTRa self-etch Universal adhesive and conventional Transbond XT on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets-An in vitro study.新型Optibond eXTRa自酸蚀通用粘结剂与传统Transbond XT对正畸托槽剪切粘结强度的比较评估及影响——一项体外研究
J Orthod Sci. 2022 Aug 24;11:43. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_22_22. eCollection 2022.
6
Evaluation the properties of orthodontic adhesive incorporated with nano-hydroxyapatite particles.评估含纳米羟基磷灰石颗粒的正畸粘合剂的性能。
Saudi Dent J. 2021 Dec;33(8):1190-1196. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Jan 13.