Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System and Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (K.K.K., B.J.M., S.M.N., M.E.O., D.K.).
Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon (C.K.A., M.F.).
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Mar 17;172(6):398-412. doi: 10.7326/M19-1105. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
Cannabis use disorder (CUD) is a growing concern, and evidence-based data are needed to inform treatment options.
To review the benefits and risks of pharmacotherapies for the treatment of CUD.
MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and clinical trial registries from inception through September 2019.
Pharmacotherapy trials of adults or adolescents with CUD that targeted cannabis abstinence or reduction, treatment retention, withdrawal symptoms, and other outcomes.
Data were abstracted by 1 investigator and confirmed by a second. Study quality was dually assessed, and strength of evidence (SOE) was determined by consensus according to standard criteria.
Across 26 trials, the evidence was largely insufficient. Low-strength evidence was found that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) do not reduce cannabis use or improve treatment retention. Low- to moderate-strength evidence was found that buspirone does not improve outcomes and that cannabinoids do not increase abstinence rates (moderate SOE), reduce cannabis use (low SOE), or increase treatment retention (low SOE). Across all drug studies, no consistent evidence of increased harm was found.
Few methodologically rigorous trials have been done. Existing trials are hampered by small sample sizes, high attrition rates, and heterogeneity of concurrent interventions and outcomes assessment.
Although data on pharmacologic interventions for CUD are scarce, evidence exists that several drug classes, including cannabinoids and SSRIs, are ineffective. Because of increasing access to and use of cannabis in the general population, along with a high prevalence of CUD among current cannabis users, an urgent need exists for more research to identify effective pharmacologic treatments.
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. (PROSPERO: CRD42018108064).
大麻使用障碍(CUD)是一个日益严重的问题,需要基于证据的数据来为治疗选择提供信息。
综述大麻使用障碍治疗的药物治疗的益处和风险。
从建库到 2019 年 9 月,检索 MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Cochrane 系统评价数据库和临床试验注册库。
针对有大麻使用障碍的成年人或青少年的药物治疗试验,以大麻戒断或减少、治疗保留、戒断症状和其他结局为目标。
由 1 名调查员提取数据,另 1 名调查员进行确认。对研究质量进行双重评估,并根据标准标准通过共识确定证据强度(SOE)。
在 26 项试验中,证据主要不足。有低强度证据表明选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)不能减少大麻使用或提高治疗保留率。有低至中度强度的证据表明丁螺环酮不能改善结局,大麻素不能提高戒断率(中度 SOE),减少大麻使用(低 SOE)或提高治疗保留率(低 SOE)。在所有药物研究中,没有发现一致性的增加危害的证据。
很少有严格方法学的试验。现有的试验受到样本量小、高失访率以及同时进行的干预措施和结局评估的异质性的限制。
尽管大麻使用障碍药物干预的数据稀缺,但有证据表明,包括大麻素和 SSRIs 在内的几种药物类别无效。由于普通人群中越来越多地获得和使用大麻,以及当前大麻使用者中 CUD 的高患病率,迫切需要开展更多的研究来确定有效的药物治疗方法。
美国退伍军人事务部。(PROSPERO:CRD42018108064)。