Gray Kevin M, Tomko Rachel L, Baker Nathaniel L, McClure Erin A, McRae-Clark Aimee L, Squeglia Lindsay M
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2025 Apr;50(5):731-738. doi: 10.1038/s41386-025-02061-y. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
Cannabis use disorder is particularly prevalent and impairing among young people, and evidence-based treatments are limited. Prior trials of N-acetylcysteine, added to contingency management as a platform behavioral intervention, yielded positive findings in youth but not in adults. This trial sought to rigorously evaluate whether N-acetylcysteine is efficacious in youth when not paired with a robust behavioral treatment platform. Treatment-seeking youth with cannabis use disorder (N = 192, ages 14-21) were randomized to receive a double-blind 12-week course of oral N-acetylcysteine 1200 mg or placebo twice daily; all received weekly medical management and brief behavioral counseling. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of negative urine cannabinoid tests during treatment, compared between groups. An array of self-report and urine testing measures were examined secondarily to assess cannabis use reduction and cessation outcomes. The N-acetylcysteine and placebo groups did not differ in proportion of negative urine cannabinoid tests (RR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.53, 1.64; p = 0.80) or self-reported cannabis abstinence (RR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.63, 1.65; p = 0.93) during treatment. The mean percentage of cannabis use days and grams of cannabis used per using day decreased over time during treatment but did not differ between groups. More N-acetylcysteine than placebo treated participants reported gastrointestinal adverse events (63/98 versus 37/94, χ = 11.9 p < 0.001); adverse events were otherwise similar between groups. Findings indicate that N-acetylcysteine is not efficacious for youth cannabis use disorder when not paired with contingency management, highlighting the potentially crucial role of a robust behavioral treatment platform in facilitating prior positive efficacy findings with N-acetylcysteine.Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03055377.
大麻使用障碍在年轻人中尤为普遍且造成损害,而循证治疗方法有限。先前将N-乙酰半胱氨酸添加到作为平台行为干预措施的应急管理中进行的试验,在青少年中取得了阳性结果,但在成年人中却没有。本试验旨在严格评估在不与强大的行为治疗平台相结合的情况下,N-乙酰半胱氨酸对青少年是否有效。患有大麻使用障碍的寻求治疗的青少年(N = 192,年龄14 - 21岁)被随机分配接受为期12周的双盲口服N-乙酰半胱氨酸1200毫克或安慰剂治疗,每日两次;所有参与者均接受每周一次的医疗管理和简短的行为咨询。主要疗效指标是治疗期间尿液中大麻素检测呈阴性的比例,比较两组情况。其次,对一系列自我报告和尿液检测指标进行了检查,以评估大麻使用减少和戒断情况。在治疗期间,N-乙酰半胱氨酸组和安慰剂组在尿液中大麻素检测呈阴性的比例(RR = 0.93,95% CI = 0.53,1.64;p = 0.80)或自我报告的大麻戒断情况(RR = 1.02,95% CI = 0.63,1.65;p = 0.93)方面没有差异。在治疗期间,大麻使用天数的平均百分比和每次使用日使用的大麻克数随时间减少,但两组之间没有差异。报告胃肠道不良事件的接受N-乙酰半胱氨酸治疗的参与者比接受安慰剂治疗的参与者更多(63/98对37/94,χ = 11.9,p < 0.001);两组之间的其他不良事件相似。研究结果表明,在不与应急管理相结合的情况下,N-乙酰半胱氨酸对青少年大麻使用障碍无效,这突出了强大的行为治疗平台在促进先前使用N-乙酰半胱氨酸获得的阳性疗效结果方面可能发挥的关键作用。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov标识符NCT03055377。