Department of Work and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arch Sex Behav. 2020 Aug;49(6):2155-2164. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-01620-x. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
Despite increased availability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), PrEP uptake has remained low. To promote uptake, factors related to PrEP interest among relevant target populations warrant investigation. The aim of this study was to provide an analysis of PrEP interest among men who have sex with men (MSM) in the Netherlands, while taking study recruitment strategies into account. We recruited 154 MSM from an LGBT research panel (AmsterdamPinkPanel) and 272 MSM from convenience sampling. Both samples were part of the Flash! PrEP in Europe Survey and were compared on their PrEP interest, usage intentions, and sexual behavior. We conducted logistic regression analyses to discover variables associated with PrEP interest and intentions. Participants from the AmsterdamPinkPanel were less likely to use PrEP, had less knowledge of PrEP, and were less interested in PrEP than participants from convenience sampling. Significant covariates of PrEP interest were being single, more prior PrEP knowledge, sexual risk behaviors, such as not having used a condom during last sex and having ever used drugs in a sexual context, and not participating in the AmsterdamPinkPanel. Adding the recruitment strategy to the regression increased explained variance on top of predictors already described in the literature. Increased sexual risk behavior is related to increased PrEP interest and it helps to identify PrEP target groups. Recruitment strategies have a substantial impact on findings regarding PrEP interest and usage intentions. This study emphasizes the importance of using multiple strategies for recruiting participants to obtain a more comprehensive view of MSM's attitudes toward PrEP.
尽管暴露前预防(PrEP)的可及性有所增加,但 PrEP 的使用率仍然很低。为了促进使用率的提高,有必要调查与相关目标人群对 PrEP 兴趣相关的因素。本研究旨在分析荷兰男男性行为者(MSM)对 PrEP 的兴趣,同时考虑研究招募策略。我们从一个 LGBT 研究小组(阿姆斯特丹粉象研究小组)招募了 154 名 MSM,从便利抽样中招募了 272 名 MSM。这两个样本都是“欧洲 Flash!PrEP 研究”的一部分,对他们的 PrEP 兴趣、使用意图和性行为进行了比较。我们进行了逻辑回归分析,以发现与 PrEP 兴趣和意图相关的变量。与便利抽样组相比,阿姆斯特丹粉象研究小组的参与者更不可能使用 PrEP,对 PrEP 的了解较少,对 PrEP 的兴趣也较低。PrEP 兴趣的显著协变量包括单身、更多的 PrEP 知识、性风险行为,如最近一次性行为未使用安全套和曾在性行为中使用过毒品,以及未参与阿姆斯特丹粉象研究小组。将招募策略添加到回归中,除了文献中已经描述的预测因素外,还增加了可解释方差。性风险行为的增加与 PrEP 兴趣的增加有关,这有助于确定 PrEP 的目标人群。招募策略对 PrEP 兴趣和使用意图的研究结果有重大影响。本研究强调了使用多种策略招募参与者的重要性,以便更全面地了解 MSM 对 PrEP 的态度。