• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多种自然灾害共同威胁下的石油泄漏风险评估。

Risk assessment for oil leakage under the common threat of multiple natural hazards.

机构信息

School of Mechatronic Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, 610500, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.

Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, T2N 1N4, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 May;27(14):16507-16520. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08184-7. Epub 2020 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-020-08184-7
PMID:32124305
Abstract

Petroleum industry can create enormous wealth and employment opportunities, which is one of the pillars of the national economy. The transportation conditions of petroleum products are complex and changeable. The natural disaster-induced dangerous chemical leakage may damage the ecological environment, which leads to substantial economic losses. It significantly undermines the sustainable development agenda. Therefore, assessing the possibility of leakage and the potential environmental damages becomes a primary task to decision-makers to formulate maintenance plans. This paper evaluated the risk of an oil pipeline leakage under the regional geological disasters. Specifically, risk assessment indicators system was established considering the common threat of multiple natural hazards in the region. The sensitivities of the influence factors were determined using the combined GIS and the contribution rate model. The fuzzy analysis approach was used to process the expert's judgment to obtain a real-time disaster hazard. Meanwhile, in terms of the analysis of pipeline failure causes, the assessment system of disaster resistance ability was developed to determine the possibility of leakage. The leakage-induced environmental losses were quantified by monetary quantification. Finally, the level of environmental risk was determined using a 5 × 5 probability-currency matrix. Case results show that the risk level is medium, thereby appropriate maintenance measures need to be taken to reduce the risk. Overall, this study provides necessary help to prevent the leakage of petroleum products in transportation. Also, the environmental risk presented in the form of currency can promote non-environmental professional risk decision-makers better understand the degree of risk.

摘要

石油工业可以创造巨大的财富和就业机会,是国民经济的支柱之一。石油产品的运输条件复杂多变,自然灾害引发的危险化学品泄漏可能会破坏生态环境,造成巨大的经济损失,严重破坏可持续发展议程。因此,评估泄漏的可能性和潜在的环境损害成为决策者制定维护计划的首要任务。本文评估了区域性地质灾害下石油管道泄漏的风险。具体来说,考虑到该地区多种自然灾害的共同威胁,建立了风险评估指标体系。利用 GIS 与贡献率模型相结合的方法,确定了影响因素的敏感性。采用模糊分析方法处理专家判断,以获得实时灾害危害。同时,在分析管道失效原因的基础上,开发了抗灾能力评估体系,以确定泄漏的可能性。通过货币量化量化泄漏引起的环境损失。最后,利用 5×5 概率-货币矩阵确定环境风险水平。案例结果表明,风险水平为中等,因此需要采取适当的维护措施来降低风险。总的来说,本研究为防止石油产品在运输过程中泄漏提供了必要的帮助。此外,以货币形式呈现的环境风险可以促进非环境专业风险决策者更好地理解风险程度。

相似文献

1
Risk assessment for oil leakage under the common threat of multiple natural hazards.多种自然灾害共同威胁下的石油泄漏风险评估。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 May;27(14):16507-16520. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08184-7. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
2
GIS-based for prediction and prevention of environmental geological disaster susceptibility: From a perspective of sustainable development.基于 GIS 的环境地质灾害易发性预测与防治:从可持续发展的角度。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021 Dec 15;226:112881. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112881. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
3
Analysis on the susceptibility of environmental geological disasters considering regional sustainable development.考虑区域可持续发展的环境地质灾害敏感性分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(4):9749-9762. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22778-3. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
4
Investigating an assessment model of system oil leakage considering failure dependence.考虑故障相关性的系统油泄漏评估模型研究
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Nov;27(32):40075-40087. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09999-0. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
5
Quantitative assessment of enterprise environmental risk mitigation in the context of Na-tech disasters.在核技术灾害背景下对企业环境风险缓解的定量评估。
Environ Monit Assess. 2019 Mar 8;191(4):210. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7351-1.
6
Natural disasters and the challenge of extreme events: risk management from an insurance perspective.自然灾害与极端事件的挑战:从保险视角看风险管理
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2006 Aug 15;364(1845):2147-65. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2006.1818.
7
[Risk assessment of ecological disasters in Jilin Province based on GIS].基于地理信息系统的吉林省生态灾害风险评估
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2007 Aug;18(8):1765-70.
8
Oil spill treatment products approval: the UK approach and potential application to the Gulf region.石油泄漏处理产品审批:英国的做法及其在海湾地区的潜在应用。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2008 Jul;56(7):1243-7. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.03.002. Epub 2008 Apr 22.
9
Coordinated analysis of county geological environment carrying capacity and sustainable development under remote sensing interpretation combined with integrated model.遥感解译结合综合模型的县级地质环境承载力与可持续发展协调性分析
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2023 Jun 1;257:114956. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.114956. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
10
Environmental risk evaluation to minimize impacts within the area affected by the Wenchuan earthquake.环境风险评估以尽量减少汶川地震影响区内的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2012 Mar 1;419:16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.12.017. Epub 2012 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Time-Space Simulation, Health Risk Warning and Policy Recommendations of Environmental Capacity for Heavy Metals in the Pearl River Basin, China.中国珠江流域重金属环境容量的时-空模拟、健康风险预警及政策建议
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 13;19(8):4694. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084694.
2
Study on Overpressure Propagation Law of Vapor Cloud Explosion under Different Building Layouts.不同建筑布局下蒸气云爆炸超压传播规律研究
ACS Omega. 2021 Nov 30;6(49):34003-34020. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c05332. eCollection 2021 Dec 14.
3
Fire risk assessment of high-rise buildings under construction based on unascertained measure theory.
基于未确知测度理论的高层建筑施工火灾风险评估
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 14;15(9):e0239166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239166. eCollection 2020.