• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型自锁定非骨水泥股骨柄的短期疗效:Lima Master 的前瞻性队列研究。

Short-term results of a new self-locking cementless femoral stem: a prospective cohort study of the Lima Master.

机构信息

Orthopaedic Research Institute of Queensland, 7 Turner Street, Pimlico, Townsville, QLD, 4812, Australia.

Department of Orthopaedics, Townsville Hospital, Townsville, Australia.

出版信息

Musculoskelet Surg. 2021 Dec;105(3):257-264. doi: 10.1007/s12306-020-00651-1. Epub 2020 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1007/s12306-020-00651-1
PMID:32124331
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8578164/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty is a successful treatment for hip osteoarthritis. Primary and secondary implant fixation is dependent on implant design and plays an important role in the longevity of an implant. In this study, we assessed the self-locking cementless Master femoral stem.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this single-centre prospective study, 50 consecutive hips with the indication for total hip arthroplasty, who met the inclusion criteria, received the Master stem from LIMA Corporate. Patients had pre- and post-operative clinical and radiological assessment and completed patient-reported outcome measures [Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)] at the 6-week and 6-, 12- and 24-month mark. Post-operative X-rays were assessed for osteointegration (Engh Score), alignment and subsidence.

RESULTS

After 2 years, aseptic survival was 100%. One hip had to be explanted due to early deep infection and was excluded from the study. At 2 years, the patients reported a significant improved HHS and OHS of 95.3 ± 5.8 and 46.1 ± 3.6 (mean ± standard deviation), respectively, compared to preoperatively. The mean ± standard deviation for the FJS was 86.4 ± 18.7 with two-thirds of the patients reporting a score above 85. The mean Engh score is 15.1 ± 5.9 (mean ± standard deviation) with no patient scoring below 1 which suggests good osteointegration in all femoral stems.

CONCLUSIONS

The Master femoral stem performed well in this short-term follow-up study, with high patient satisfaction and good signs of osteointegration. Long-term follow-up will be necessary to evaluate longevity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3, Prospective cohort study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered on the 30.03.2016 with Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12617000550303).

摘要

背景

全髋关节置换术是治疗髋关节骨关节炎的一种成功方法。初次和二次植入物固定取决于植入物设计,并在植入物的使用寿命中起着重要作用。在这项研究中,我们评估了自锁型非骨水泥 Master 股骨柄。

材料和方法

在这项单中心前瞻性研究中,符合纳入标准的 50 例连续髋关节接受了来自 LIMA Corporate 的 Master 股骨柄。患者接受了术前和术后的临床和放射学评估,并在 6 周、6、12 和 24 个月时完成了患者报告的结局测量[牛津髋关节评分(OHS)、Harris 髋关节评分(HHS)和遗忘关节评分(FJS)]。术后 X 射线评估了骨整合(Engh 评分)、对线和下沉情况。

结果

2 年后,无菌生存率为 100%。1 例因早期深部感染而不得不取出髋关节,被排除在研究之外。2 年后,患者报告 HHS 和 OHS 分别显著改善至 95.3±5.8 和 46.1±3.6(均值±标准差),与术前相比。FJS 的均值±标准差为 86.4±18.7,三分之二的患者报告评分高于 85。平均 Engh 评分是 15.1±5.9(均值±标准差),没有患者评分低于 1,这表明所有股骨柄均有良好的骨整合。

结论

在这项短期随访研究中,Master 股骨柄表现良好,患者满意度高,有良好的骨整合迹象。需要长期随访来评估其长期效果。

证据水平

3 级,前瞻性队列研究。

试验注册

该研究于 2016 年 3 月 30 日在澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12617000550303)注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37f5/8578164/aec96757da12/12306_2020_651_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37f5/8578164/87688bb9f713/12306_2020_651_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37f5/8578164/03e3a3eaf346/12306_2020_651_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37f5/8578164/9305913b62e3/12306_2020_651_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37f5/8578164/aec96757da12/12306_2020_651_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37f5/8578164/87688bb9f713/12306_2020_651_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37f5/8578164/03e3a3eaf346/12306_2020_651_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37f5/8578164/9305913b62e3/12306_2020_651_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37f5/8578164/aec96757da12/12306_2020_651_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Short-term results of a new self-locking cementless femoral stem: a prospective cohort study of the Lima Master.新型自锁定非骨水泥股骨柄的短期疗效:Lima Master 的前瞻性队列研究。
Musculoskelet Surg. 2021 Dec;105(3):257-264. doi: 10.1007/s12306-020-00651-1. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
2
Thirteen year follow-up of a cementless femoral stem and a threaded acetabular cup in patients younger than fifty years of age.对年龄小于50岁患者的非骨水泥型股骨柄和带螺纹髋臼杯进行的13年随访。
Int Orthop. 2017 Jan;41(1):39-45. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3226-z. Epub 2016 May 30.
3
Prospective randomized study using EBRA-FCA to compare bone fixation between cementless SL-PLUS Zweymüller versus SL-PLUS MIA femoral implants in primary total hip arthroplasty with clinical assessment at a minimum 5years' follow-up.前瞻性随机研究采用 EBRA-FCA 比较非骨水泥 SL-PLUS Zweymüller 与 SL-PLUS MIA 股骨柄假体在初次全髋关节置换术中的骨固定情况,临床评估至少 5 年随访。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 May;106(3):519-525. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.10.011. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
4
High rate of fracture in the cementless modular Extrême™ (Mark I) femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty: 33 cases at more than 5 years' follow-up.非骨水泥模块化 Extrême™(第一代)股骨假体在翻修全髋关节置换术中骨折率高:33 例超过 5 年随访。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 Dec;99(8):915-21. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.08.007. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
5
Compared fixation and survival of 280 lateralised vs 527 standard cementless stems after two years (1-7).两年后,对280个侧方固定型与527个标准非骨水泥型股骨柄的固定情况和生存率进行了比较(1 - 7)。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Nov;101(7):775-80. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
6
Long-term survivorship of a monoblock long cementless stem in revision total hip arthroplasty.单块式非骨水泥长柄假体在翻修全髋关节置换术中的长期生存研究。
Int Orthop. 2019 Oct;43(10):2279-2284. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4186-2. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
7
Can a Conical Implant Successfully Address Complex Anatomy in Primary THA? Radiographs and Hip Scores at Early Followup.锥形植入物能否成功解决初次全髋关节置换术中的复杂解剖结构问题?早期随访的X线片和髋关节评分
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb;474(2):459-64. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4480-x.
8
Comparison of periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of anatomic and tapered cementless femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study protocol.全髋关节置换术中解剖型和锥形非骨水泥股骨柄植入后假体周围骨重塑的比较:一项前瞻性队列研究方案。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(39):e12560. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012560.
9
Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems Osseointegrate Reliably at Short Term in Revision THAs.非模块化锥形带槽钛柄在翻修全髋关节置换术中短期内能可靠地实现骨整合。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan;475(1):186-192. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5091-x. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
10
Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed with a Novel Design Type 1 Femoral Stem: A Retrospective Minimum 5-Year Follow-up Study.新型 1 型股骨柄全髋关节置换术:一项回顾性至少 5 年随访研究。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2022 Mar;14(1):28-34. doi: 10.4055/cios21048. Epub 2022 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of early migration patterns between a ceramic and polyethylene liner in uncemented Trabecular Titanium cups: a 2-year randomized controlled trial of 52 hips using radiostereometric analysis.在未固定的 Trabecular Titanium 杯中外层陶瓷与聚乙烯衬垫早期迁移模式的比较:52 髋使用放射学体层摄影术分析的 2 年随机对照试验。
Acta Orthop. 2022 Apr 28;93:451-458. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2022.2267.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient-reported health outcomes after total hip and knee surgery in a Dutch University Hospital Setting: results of twenty years clinical registry.荷兰大学医院环境下全髋关节和膝关节置换术后患者报告的健康结局:20年临床登记结果
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Mar 3;18(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1455-y.
2
Surgical approach in primary total hip arthroplasty: anatomy, technique and clinical outcomes.初次全髋关节置换术的手术入路:解剖、技术及临床结果
Can J Surg. 2015 Apr;58(2):128-39. doi: 10.1503/cjs.007214.
3
Survival outcomes of cemented compared to uncemented stems in primary total hip replacement.
初次全髋关节置换中骨水泥型与非骨水泥型股骨柄的生存结果。
World J Orthop. 2014 Nov 18;5(5):591-6. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v5.i5.591.
4
Hip arthroplasty.髋关节置换术。
Lancet. 2012 Nov 17;380(9855):1768-77. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60607-2. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
5
The "forgotten joint" as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty: validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure.将“被遗忘的关节”作为关节置换术的终极目标:一种新的患者报告结局测量的验证。
J Arthroplasty. 2012 Mar;27(3):430-436.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.035. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
6
Total hip arthroplasty in developmental hip dysplasia using cementless tapered stem. Results after a minimum 10-year follow-up.使用非骨水泥锥形柄进行发育性髋关节发育不良的全髋关节置换术。至少10年随访结果。
Hip Int. 2011 Jul-Aug;21(4):415-20. doi: 10.5301/HIP.2011.8588.
7
Radiographic assessment of uncemented total hip arthroplasty: reliability of the Engh Grading Scale.非骨水泥全髋关节置换的放射学评估:Engh 分级量表的可靠性。
Can J Surg. 2011 Jun;54(3):185-8. doi: 10.1503/cjs.002610.
8
What is a good patient reported outcome after total hip replacement?全髋关节置换术后的良好患者报告结局是什么?
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Feb;19(2):155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.10.004. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
9
The operation of the century: total hip replacement.世纪手术:全髋关节置换术。
Lancet. 2007 Oct 27;370(9597):1508-19. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7.
10
The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores.牛津髋关节和膝关节评分的应用。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Aug;89(8):1010-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B8.19424.