Service de Bactériologie-Hygiène hospitalière, CHU de Nantes, Institut de Biologie, 9, quai Moncousu 44093, Cedex 1, Nantes, France.
Nantes study group member of CRIOGO (Centre de Référence des Infections Ostéo-articulaires du Grand Ouest), Nantes, France.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;39(7):1357-1364. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-03852-5. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
A 10-year retrospective study of Propionibacterium/Cutibacterium-positive samples gathered from hospitalized patients was conducted at Nantes University hospital. A total of 2728 Propionibacterium/Cutibacterium-positive samples analyzed between 2007 and 2016 were included. Due to the implementation of MALDI-TOF identification in 2013, most non-Cutibacterium acnes isolates were identified a second time using this technology. Over that period, Cutibacterium acnes remained the most predominant species accounting for 91.5% (2497/2728) of the isolates, followed by Cutibacterium avidum (4.2%, 115/2728) and Cutibacterium granulosum (2.4%, 64/2728). Regarding the origin of samples, the orthopaedic department was the main Cutibacterium sample provider representing 51.9% (1415/2728) of all samples followed by the dermatology department (11.5%, 315/2728). Samples were recovered from various tissue locations: 31.5% (858/2728) from surgery-related samples such as shoulder, spine or hip replacement devices and 19.1% (520/2728) from skin samples. MALDI-TOF method revealed misidentification before 2013. Cutibacterium avidum was falsely identified as C. granulosum (n = 33). Consequently, MALDI-TOF technology using up-to-date databases should be preferred to biochemical identification in order to avoid biased species identification. Regarding antibiotic resistance, 14.7% (20/136) of C. acnes was resistant to erythromycin. 4.1% (41/1005) of C. acnes strains, 17.9% (12/67) of C. avidum strains and 3.6% (1/28) of C. granulosum strains were found resistant to clindamycin.
法国南特大学医院开展了一项针对住院患者采集的丙酸杆菌/痤疮丙酸杆菌阳性样本的 10 年回顾性研究。该研究共纳入 2007 年至 2016 年间分析的 2728 份丙酸杆菌/痤疮丙酸杆菌阳性样本。由于 2013 年采用 MALDI-TOF 鉴定技术,大多数非痤疮丙酸杆菌分离株使用该技术进行了第二次鉴定。在此期间,痤疮丙酸杆菌仍然是最主要的菌种,占分离株的 91.5%(2497/2728),其次是缓症痤疮丙酸杆菌(4.2%,115/2728)和颗粒丙酸杆菌(2.4%,64/2728)。关于样本来源,矫形外科是痤疮丙酸杆菌样本的主要提供者,占所有样本的 51.9%(1415/2728),其次是皮肤科(11.5%,315/2728)。样本取自不同的组织部位:31.5%(858/2728)来自肩部、脊柱或髋关节置换装置等与手术相关的样本,19.1%(520/2728)来自皮肤样本。MALDI-TOF 方法在 2013 年之前显示出错误识别。缓症痤疮丙酸杆菌被错误地鉴定为颗粒丙酸杆菌(n=33)。因此,为避免偏倚的物种鉴定,应优先使用基于最新数据库的 MALDI-TOF 技术进行生化鉴定。关于抗生素耐药性,14.7%(20/136)的痤疮丙酸杆菌对红霉素耐药。4.1%(41/1005)的痤疮丙酸杆菌株、17.9%(12/67)的缓症痤疮丙酸杆菌株和 3.6%(1/28)的颗粒丙酸杆菌株对克林霉素耐药。