• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科重症监护病房中家长对研究同意书的理解:一项初步研究。

Parental Understanding of Research Consent Forms in the PICU: A Pilot Study.

机构信息

Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Jun;21(6):526-534. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002234.

DOI:10.1097/PCC.0000000000002234
PMID:32132500
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe legal guardians' understanding of key concepts in a research consent form presented within 24 hours of their child's admission to the PICU and to explore legal guardians' opinions of the format (language, length) of the consent form and the overall consent process.

DESIGN

Single-center, exploratory pilot study.

SETTING

PICU at a tertiary-care hospital in Canada.

SUBJECTS

Forty-one English- and French-speaking legal guardians of children less than 18 years old, who had been admitted to the PICU within the past 24 hours and were expected to stay at least 48 hours, between October 2018 and February 2019.

INTERVENTIONS

The consent form from a previous PICU trial was given and explained to legal guardians within 24 hours of their child's admission to the PICU.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Legal guardians' understanding of key concepts in the consent form was evaluated using a questionnaire the day after the form was explained, and opinions were collected verbally and using an additional survey. The median number of questions answered incorrectly was three of seven (interquartile range = 2-4). Participants best understood the topic of the study (5% incorrect), but 80% of participants were unable to recall a single risk. The median rating of the language in the form was five of five (very easy to understand; interquartile range = 4-5), and 88% of participants said it was a reasonable length.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite positive opinions of the consent form, most legal guardians did not understand all key components of the consent information provided to them orally and in writing within 24 hours of their child's PICU admission. Future studies are required to determine barriers to understanding and explore alternative approaches to obtaining consent in this setting.

摘要

目的

描述患儿被收入 PICU 后 24 小时内其法定监护人对研究知情同意书中关键概念的理解,并探讨法定监护人对知情同意书格式(语言、篇幅)和整个知情同意过程的看法。

设计

单中心、探索性试点研究。

地点

加拿大一家三级医院的 PICU。

研究对象

2018 年 10 月至 2019 年 2 月期间,41 名母语为英语或法语、年龄在 18 岁以下、入院 24 小时内且预计至少住院 48 小时的患儿的法定监护人。

干预措施

患儿被收入 PICU 后 24 小时内,将之前的 PICU 试验知情同意书交给法定监护人并进行解释。

测量和主要结果

在解释知情同意书的次日,通过问卷评估法定监护人对知情同意书中关键概念的理解程度,并通过口头和额外的调查收集意见。7 个问题中答错 3 个的人数为中位数(四分位间距=2-4)。参与者对研究主题(答错 5%)的理解最好,但 80%的参与者无法回忆出单个风险。对书面知情同意书中语言的评分中位数为 5 分(非常易懂;四分位间距=4-5),88%的参与者表示篇幅合理。

结论

尽管对知情同意书的评价积极,但大多数法定监护人在患儿被收入 PICU 后 24 小时内,通过口头和书面形式获得的知情同意信息中,并未理解所有关键内容。需要进一步研究以确定理解障碍,并探讨在这种情况下获得同意的替代方法。

相似文献

1
Parental Understanding of Research Consent Forms in the PICU: A Pilot Study.儿科重症监护病房中家长对研究同意书的理解:一项初步研究。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Jun;21(6):526-534. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002234.
2
The Effects of Expectation Setting and Bundle Consent on Acute Caregiver Stress in the PICU: A Randomized Controlled Trial.期待设定和捆绑式知情同意对儿科重症监护病房急性照顾者压力的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2023 Aug 1;24(8):692-700. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003265. Epub 2023 May 1.
3
Informed consent for bedside procedures in the pediatric intensive care unit: a preliminary report.儿科重症监护病房床边操作的知情同意:初步报告。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011 Nov;12(6):e266-70. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31820aba87.
4
Impact of Legal Guardian Absence on Research Enrollment in the PICU.法定监护人不在场对 PICU 研究入组的影响。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2024 Sep 1;25(9):e380-e384. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003551. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
5
Consenting to pediatric critical care research: understanding the perspective of parents.同意小儿重症监护研究:理解家长的观点。
Dynamics. 2013 Fall;24(3):18-24.
6
Feasibility and Acceptability of Mobile Phone-Based Surveys to Identify Mental Health Symptoms in Parents/Guardians of PICU Patients.基于手机的调查在识别 PICU 患儿家长/监护人的心理健康症状方面的可行性和可接受性。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2024 Oct 1;25(10):947-952. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003573. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
7
A study of consent for participation in a non-therapeutic study in the pediatric intensive care population.一项关于在儿科重症监护人群中参与非治疗性研究的同意书研究。
J Med Ethics. 2014 Feb;40(2):123-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101075. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
8
Parental anxiety and medical comprehension within 24 hrs of a child's admission to the pediatric intensive care unit*.患儿入住儿科重症监护病房 24 小时内的父母焦虑和医学理解*。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009 Nov;10(6):668-74; quiz 674. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181a706c9.
9
Assessment of Parents'/Guardians' Initial Comprehension and 1-Day Recall of Elements of Informed Consent Within a Mozambican Study of Pediatric Bacteremia.在莫桑比克一项关于儿童菌血症的研究中,对父母/监护人对知情同意要素的初始理解及一日后回忆情况的评估
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Jul;13(3):247-257. doi: 10.1177/1556264618767780. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
10
Emerging issues in paediatric health research consent forms in Canada: working towards best practices.加拿大儿科健康研究同意书的新问题:努力实现最佳实践。
BMC Med Ethics. 2013 Jan 30;14:5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges and best practices for recruiting families of children with intellectual disabilities for health research.招募智障儿童家庭参与健康研究的挑战与最佳实践
J Intellect Disabil. 2024 May 16;29(3):17446295241255178. doi: 10.1177/17446295241255178.
2
Consent models in Canadian critical care randomized controlled trials: a scoping review.加拿大重症监护随机对照试验中的同意模式:范围综述。
Can J Anaesth. 2022 Apr;69(4):513-526. doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-02176-y. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
3
Understanding parents' decision-making on participation in clinical trials in children's heart surgery: a qualitative study.
理解父母在儿童心脏手术临床试验中参与决策的情况:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 23;11(2):e044896. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044896.