Kotsis Thomas, Christoforou Panagitsa, Nastos Konstantinos
Vascular Unit, 2nd Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Aretaieion University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Int J Angiol. 2020 Mar;29(1):33-38. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3400478. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
The technique of the eversion carotid endarterectomy (ECEA), as an alternative to the conventional endarterectomy with primary or patch angioplasty, is an established technique for managing internal carotid artery stenoses and recently its application has been upgraded through the European Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines (Recommendation 55: Class 1, Level A). However, the typical eversion method has been associated with postoperative hypertension due to loss of the baroreceptor reflex; the standard oblique transection at the bulb performed in the eversion endarterectomy interrupts either the baroreceptor sensoring tissue, which is mostly located in the adventitia at the medial portion of the proximal internal carotid artery, or even the proper Hering nerve, a branch of the glossopharyngeal nerve. These actions deregulate the natural negative feedback of the carotid baroreceptor. Guided by the anatomical location of the baroreceptor sensor we have elaborated a slight modification of the classical ECEA to maintain as much as possible of the viable carotid baroreceptor sensoring surface. By extending the oblique incision distal to the carotid bifurcation in the medial part of the internal carotid artery stem, an eyebrow-like part of the proximal internal carotid artery is maintained and the axis from the sensoring tissue to the nerve of Hering is protected and following the endarterectomy, postoperative arterial blood pressure levels are lower than in the classical ECEA due to the maintenance of the efficiency of the baroreceptor reflex. During the period from September 2016 to November 2018, carotid endarterectomy was performed in 57 patients. Twenty-eight of them underwent the typical ECEA and 29 patients had the modified eyebrow eversion carotid endarterectomy (me-ECEA). The changes of blood pressure baseline during the postoperative course in ECEA and me-ECEA group were analyzed and compared. Postoperative hypertension was defined as an elevation of systolic blood pressure (SBP) greater than 140 mm Hg. Patients who underwent typical ECEA had significantly higher postoperative blood pressure values compared with those who underwent me-ECEA. Actually, the mean postoperative SBP was 172.67 ± 24.59 mm Hg in the typical ECEA group compared with 160.86 ± 12.83 mm Hg in the me-ECEA group ( = 0.023). The mean diastolic blood pressure in the ECEA group was 65.42 ± 11.39 mm Hg compared with 58.06 ± 9.06 mm Hg in the me-ECEA group ( = 0.009). Our proposed me-ECEA technique seems to be related to lower rates of postoperative hypertension compared with the typical ECEA, probably due to the sparing of the main mass of the baroreceptor apparatus; this improved modification (me-ECEA) of the typical eversion procedure could represent an alternative ECEA technique with its inherent advantages.
外翻式颈动脉内膜切除术(ECEA)技术,作为传统内膜切除术加原发性或补片血管成形术的替代方法,是一种成熟的治疗颈内动脉狭窄的技术,最近其应用已通过欧洲血管外科学会指南得到升级(推荐55:1级,A级)。然而,典型的外翻方法因压力感受器反射丧失而与术后高血压有关;外翻式内膜切除术中在球部进行的标准斜行横断会中断压力感受器传感组织,该组织大多位于颈内动脉近端内侧部分的外膜,甚至会中断舌咽神经的分支——真正的赫林神经。这些操作会破坏颈动脉压力感受器的自然负反馈。在压力感受器传感器的解剖位置的指导下,我们对经典的ECEA进行了轻微改良,以尽可能保留存活的颈动脉压力感受器传感表面。通过将斜切口延伸至颈内动脉干内侧部分的颈动脉分叉远端,保留了颈内动脉近端的眉状部分,保护了从传感组织到赫林神经的轴线,并且在内膜切除术后,由于压力感受器反射效率的维持,术后动脉血压水平低于经典ECEA。在2016年9月至2018年11月期间,对57例患者进行了颈动脉内膜切除术。其中28例接受了典型的ECEA,29例患者接受了改良眉状外翻式颈动脉内膜切除术(me-ECEA)。分析并比较了ECEA组和me-ECEA组术后过程中血压基线的变化。术后高血压定义为收缩压(SBP)升高大于140 mmHg。接受典型ECEA的患者术后血压值明显高于接受me-ECEA的患者。实际上,典型ECEA组术后平均SBP为172.67±24.59 mmHg,而me-ECEA组为160.86±12.83 mmHg(P = 0.023)。ECEA组平均舒张压为65.42±11.39 mmHg,而me-ECEA组为58.06±9.06 mmHg(P = 0.009)。我们提出的me-ECEA技术与典型ECEA相比,术后高血压发生率似乎更低,可能是由于保留了压力感受器装置的主要部分;这种对典型外翻手术的改良(me-ECEA)可能代表了一种具有固有优势的替代ECEA技术。