Adelaide United Football Club, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA) School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
J Sports Sci Med. 2020 Feb 24;19(1):78-83. eCollection 2020 Mar.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of contextual factors on game styles in professional soccer. Interactions between styles and different playing venues, opposition quality, total match goals, and competing styles, were investigated using logistic regression and odds ratios. Game styles were characterised using the moments of play framework where three distinct styles have been identified: Style 1 - moderate strength in defence; Style 2 - dominance in transition, and Style 3 - strength in attacking phases of play. Results revealed that when playing at home against teams identified by Style 1, teams were more likely to play Style 2 (p < 0.05) or Style 3 (p < 0.001). Against top 10 opposition, teams were less likely to play Style 3 compared to either Style 1 (p < 0.001) or Style 2 (p < 0.001). Regardless of venue, teams were more likely to play Style 3 against bottom 10 sides compared to either Style 1 (p < 0.001) or Style 2 (p < 0.001), suggesting a hierarchical order between contextual factors. Competing game styles significantly impacted total match goals scored, whilst match results were also influenced by game style combinations. Overall, this study showed the significant effects of various contextual variables on game styles played by teams in the EPL.
本研究旨在评估情境因素对职业足球比赛风格的影响。使用逻辑回归和优势比研究了风格与不同比赛场地、对手质量、总比赛进球和竞争风格之间的相互作用。使用比赛时刻框架来描述比赛风格,其中确定了三种不同的风格:风格 1-防守强度中等;风格 2-转换中的优势;风格 3-比赛进攻阶段的优势。结果表明,当在主场对阵被确定为风格 1 的球队时,球队更有可能采用风格 2(p<0.05)或风格 3(p<0.001)。与排名前 10 的对手相比,与风格 1(p<0.001)或风格 2(p<0.001)相比,球队更不可能采用风格 3。无论比赛场地如何,与风格 1(p<0.001)或风格 2(p<0.001)相比,球队在对阵排名垫底的 10 支球队时更有可能采用风格 3,这表明情境因素之间存在层次顺序。竞争风格对总比赛进球数有显著影响,而比赛结果也受到比赛风格组合的影响。总体而言,本研究表明各种情境变量对 EPL 球队比赛风格的显著影响。