• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种临床标准(快速序贯器官衰竭评估、全身炎症反应综合征和国家早期预警评分)对疑似感染的异基因造血细胞移植受者短期死亡率的预测价值。

Predictive Value of 3 Clinical Criteria for Sepsis (Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, and National Early Warning Score) With Respect to Short-term Mortality in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients With Suspected Infections.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Apr 8;72(7):1220-1229. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa214.

DOI:10.1093/cid/ciaa214
PMID:32133490
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8028104/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sepsis disproportionately affects allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients and is challenging to define. Clinical criteria that predict mortality and intensive care unit end-points in patients with suspected infections (SIs) are used in sepsis definitions, but their predictive value among immunocompromised populations is largely unknown. Here, we evaluate 3 criteria among allogeneic HCT recipients with SIs.

METHODS

We evaluated Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), and National Early Warning Score (NEWS) in relation to short-term mortality among recipients transplanted between September 2010 and July 2017. We used cut-points of ≥ 2 for qSOFA/SIRS and ≥ 7 for NEWS and restricted to first SI per hospital encounter during patients' first 100 days posttransplant.

RESULTS

Of the 880 recipients who experienced ≥ 1 SI, 58 (6.6%) died within 28 days and 22 (2.5%) within 10 days of an SI. In relation to 10-day mortality, SIRS was the most sensitive (91.3% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 72.0%-98.9%]) but least specific (35.0% [95% CI, 32.6%-37.5%]), whereas qSOFA was the most specific (90.5% [95% CI, 88.9%-91.9%]) but least sensitive (47.8% [95% CI, 26.8%-69.4%]). NEWS was moderately sensitive (78.3% [95% CI, 56.3%-92.5%]) and specific (70.2% [95% CI, 67.8%-72.4%]).

CONCLUSIONS

NEWS outperformed qSOFA and SIRS, but each criterion had low to moderate predictive accuracy, and the magnitude of the known limitations of qSOFA and SIRS was at least as large as in the general population. Our data suggest that population-specific criteria are needed for immunocompromised patients.

摘要

背景

脓毒症在异基因造血细胞移植(HCT)受者中发生率较高,且难以定义。用于脓毒症定义的临床标准可预测疑似感染(SI)患者的死亡率和重症监护病房终点,但在免疫功能低下人群中的预测价值尚不清楚。在此,我们评估了 3 项异基因 HCT 受者 SI 相关标准。

方法

我们评估了 2010 年 9 月至 2017 年 7 月间移植的患者的全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)、快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)和国家早期预警评分(NEWS)与短期死亡率的关系。我们使用 qSOFA/SIRS≥2 和 NEWS≥7 作为切点,并将其限制在患者移植后 100 天内每个住院就诊时的首次 SI。

结果

在经历≥1 次 SI 的 880 名受者中,58 名(6.6%)在 28 天内死亡,22 名(2.5%)在 10 天内死亡。在与 10 天死亡率相关方面,SIRS 的敏感性最高(91.3%[95%CI,72.0%-98.9%]),但特异性最低(35.0%[95%CI,32.6%-37.5%]),而 qSOFA 的特异性最高(90.5%[95%CI,88.9%-91.9%]),但敏感性最低(47.8%[95%CI,26.8%-69.4%])。NEWS 的敏感性(78.3%[95%CI,56.3%-92.5%])和特异性(70.2%[95%CI,67.8%-72.4%])适中。

结论

NEWS 优于 qSOFA 和 SIRS,但每个标准的预测准确性均较低,且 qSOFA 和 SIRS 的已知局限性的程度至少与一般人群一样大。我们的数据表明,免疫功能低下患者需要特定人群的标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/526c/8028104/194c2a2eb84e/ciaa214f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/526c/8028104/85fdb10bc8b5/ciaa214f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/526c/8028104/e77f979cb75f/ciaa214f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/526c/8028104/f578023b6b29/ciaa214f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/526c/8028104/8b4ed5a1d847/ciaa214f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/526c/8028104/194c2a2eb84e/ciaa214f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/526c/8028104/85fdb10bc8b5/ciaa214f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/526c/8028104/e77f979cb75f/ciaa214f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/526c/8028104/f578023b6b29/ciaa214f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/526c/8028104/8b4ed5a1d847/ciaa214f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/526c/8028104/194c2a2eb84e/ciaa214f0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictive Value of 3 Clinical Criteria for Sepsis (Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, and National Early Warning Score) With Respect to Short-term Mortality in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients With Suspected Infections.三种临床标准(快速序贯器官衰竭评估、全身炎症反应综合征和国家早期预警评分)对疑似感染的异基因造血细胞移植受者短期死亡率的预测价值。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Apr 8;72(7):1220-1229. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa214.
2
Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, and Early Warning Scores for Detecting Clinical Deterioration in Infected Patients outside the Intensive Care Unit.快速脓毒症相关器官功能衰竭评估、全身炎症反应综合征及早期预警评分用于检测重症监护病房以外感染患者的临床病情恶化
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr 1;195(7):906-911. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201604-0854OC.
3
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model to Estimate Bacterial Sepsis Among Immunocompromised Recipients of Stem Cell Transplant.机器学习模型的开发与验证:用于评估干细胞移植免疫功能低下受者中的细菌性败血症
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e214514. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.4514.
4
The utility of the rapid emergency medicine score (REMS) compared with SIRS, qSOFA and NEWS for Predicting in-hospital Mortality among Patients with suspicion of Sepsis in an emergency department.快速急诊医学评分(REMS)与 SIRS、qSOFA 和 NEWS 相比,在预测急诊科疑似脓毒症患者住院死亡率方面的效用。
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00396-x.
5
Prognostic value of serial score measurements of the national early warning score, the quick sequential organ failure assessment and the systemic inflammatory response syndrome to predict clinical outcome in early sepsis.连续测量国家早期预警评分、快速序贯器官衰竭评估和全身炎症反应综合征的评分对早期脓毒症临床转归的预测价值。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2022 Oct 1;29(5):348-356. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000924. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
6
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).脓毒症临床标准评估:针对《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义》(Sepsis-3)。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
7
qSOFA, SIRS and NEWS for predicting inhospital mortality and ICU admission in emergency admissions treated as sepsis.qSOFA、SIRS 和 NEWS 用于预测急诊治疗的疑似脓毒症患者的院内死亡率和 ICU 收治率。
Emerg Med J. 2018 Jun;35(6):345-349. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-207120. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
8
Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.SOFA 评分、SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对 ICU 收治的疑似感染成人院内死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20328.
9
Validation of prognostic accuracy of the SOFA score, SIRS criteria, and qSOFA score for in-hospital mortality among cardiac-, thoracic-, and vascular-surgery patients admitted to a cardiothoracic intensive care unit.入住心胸重症监护病房的心脏、胸科和血管手术患者中,序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准及快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分对院内死亡率预后准确性的验证。
J Card Surg. 2020 Jan;35(1):118-127. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14331. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
10
Comparison of qSOFA and SIRS for predicting adverse outcomes of patients with suspicion of sepsis outside the intensive care unit.qSOFA与SIRS用于预测非重症监护病房疑似脓毒症患者不良结局的比较。
Crit Care. 2017 Mar 26;21(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1658-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of persistent bacteremia in patients with head and neck cancer in a tertiary care hospital.三级护理医院中头颈癌患者持续性菌血症的临床特征及结局
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jun 19;11:1406983. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1406983. eCollection 2024.
2
Predictive performance of NEWS and qSOFA in immunocompromised sepsis patients at the emergency department.免疫抑制脓毒症患者在急诊科应用 NEWS 和 qSOFA 的预测性能。
Infection. 2024 Oct;52(5):1863-1873. doi: 10.1007/s15010-024-02247-4. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
3
Hospital-Onset Sepsis Warrants Expanded Investigation and Consideration as a Unique Clinical Entity.

本文引用的文献

1
Transplant center characteristics and survival after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in adults.成人异基因造血细胞移植后的移植中心特征和生存情况。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020 May;55(5):906-917. doi: 10.1038/s41409-019-0748-1. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
2
Limited Utility of Outpatient Surveillance Blood Cultures in Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients on High-Dose Steroids for Treatment of Acute Graft-versus-Host-Disease.在接受大剂量类固醇治疗急性移植物抗宿主病的造血细胞移植受者中,门诊监测血培养的效用有限。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Jun;25(6):1247-1252. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.01.031. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
3
医院获得性脓毒症作为一种独特的临床实体值得更广泛的调查和考虑。
Chest. 2024 Jun;165(6):1421-1430. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.01.028. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
4
The Performance of Sepsis-3 Criteria to Predict Mortality Among Patients With Hematologic Malignancy and Post-transplant who Have Suspected Infection.脓毒症3标准对疑似感染的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者和移植后患者死亡率的预测效能
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 18;8(11):ofab529. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab529. eCollection 2021 Nov.
5
A biomarker panel for risk of early respiratory failure following hematopoietic cell transplantation.造血细胞移植后早期呼吸衰竭风险的生物标志物面板。
Blood Adv. 2022 Mar 22;6(6):1866-1878. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005770.
6
Is qSOFA Suitable for Early Diagnosis of Sepsis Among Bacteremia Patients in Emergency Departments? Time for a Reappraisal of Sepsis-3 Criteria.qSOFA是否适用于急诊科菌血症患者脓毒症的早期诊断?是时候重新评估脓毒症-3标准了。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Oct 20;8:743822. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.743822. eCollection 2021.
7
National Early Warning Score in Predicting Severe Adverse Outcomes of Emergency Medicine Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.国家早期预警评分在预测急诊医学患者严重不良结局中的应用:一项回顾性队列研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Aug 4;14:2067-2078. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S324068. eCollection 2021.
8
Limits of the Glasgow Coma Scale When Assessing for Sepsis in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients.格拉斯哥昏迷评分在评估异基因造血细胞移植受者脓毒症中的局限性。
Nurs Res. 2021;70(5):399-404. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000521.
9
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model to Estimate Bacterial Sepsis Among Immunocompromised Recipients of Stem Cell Transplant.机器学习模型的开发与验证:用于评估干细胞移植免疫功能低下受者中的细菌性败血症
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e214514. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.4514.
10
Predictive Models of Fever, ICU Transfer, and Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With Neutropenia.中性粒细胞减少症住院患者发热、转入重症监护病房及死亡率的预测模型
Crit Care Explor. 2020 Dec 2;2(12):e0289. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000289. eCollection 2020 Dec.
Predicting mortality in patients with suspected sepsis at the Emergency Department; A retrospective cohort study comparing qSOFA, SIRS and National Early Warning Score.
预测急诊科疑似脓毒症患者的死亡率:一项比较 qSOFA、SIRS 和国家早期预警评分的回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):e0211133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211133. eCollection 2019.
4
qSOFA is a Poor Predictor of Short-Term Mortality in All Patients: A Systematic Review of 410,000 Patients.qSOFA对所有患者短期死亡率的预测能力较差:对410,000例患者的系统评价
J Clin Med. 2019 Jan 8;8(1):61. doi: 10.3390/jcm8010061.
5
Head-to-head comparison of qSOFA and SIRS criteria in predicting the mortality of infected patients in the emergency department: a meta-analysis.头对头比较 qSOFA 和 SIRS 标准在预测急诊科感染患者死亡率中的作用:一项荟萃分析。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Jul 11;26(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0527-9.
6
Implications of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle and Initial Lactate Measurement on the Management of Sepsis.医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克早期管理捆绑包和初始乳酸测量对脓毒症管理的影响。
Chest. 2018 Aug;154(2):302-308. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.03.025. Epub 2018 May 24.
7
Association of the Quick Sequential (Sepsis-Related) Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) Score With Excess Hospital Mortality in Adults With Suspected Infection in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分与中低收入国家疑似感染成人医院过度死亡率的关系。
JAMA. 2018 Jun 5;319(21):2202-2211. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.6229.
8
Prognostic Accuracy of the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment for Mortality in Patients With Suspected Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.快速序贯器官衰竭评估对疑似感染患者死亡率的预后准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Feb 20;168(4):266-275. doi: 10.7326/M17-2820. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
9
Stool Microbiota at Neutrophil Recovery Is Predictive for Severe Acute Graft vs Host Disease After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.粪便微生物群在中性粒细胞恢复时可预测造血细胞移植后严重急性移植物抗宿主病。
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Nov 29;65(12):1984-1991. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix699.
10
Time to Treatment and Mortality during Mandated Emergency Care for Sepsis.脓毒症强制紧急治疗的治疗时间与死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 8;376(23):2235-2244. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1703058. Epub 2017 May 21.